International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

The performance of several papaya genotypes (Carica papaya L.) as crossing results

By: Rahayu Eka Sari, Siti Hafsah, Bakhtiar

Key Words: Carica papaya, Genotype, Crossbreeding, Genetic diversity, Quality of results

Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res. 12(6), 64-69, June 2018.

Certification: ijaar 2018 0113 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Efforts to improve papaya quality can be achieved by genotypes crossbreeding. The crosslines are expected to have superior quality compared to the elders. This study aims to get the information as regards character of the crossbreeding results in several papaya genotypes. This research was conducted in Saree Village, Lembah Seulawah, Regency of Aceh Besar and Horticultural Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Syiah Kuala University from March to July 2017. This study used 11 genotypes of papaya as a treatment (4 elders are Calina (USK4), Carmida(USK6), Dapina (USK7), Carisya (USK1) and 7 genotypes were the crosslines). The design used was Randomized Completely Block Design with Non Factorial pattern. The number of crossline is 7, and 4 elders as a comparison, so there are 11 experimental treatments. Data analysis was performed by using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to determine the effect of genotypes tested. If the ANOVA test shows a real effect, then proceed with the Tukey Test at the 5% level (Tukey0.05). The results of this research showed there was a high diversity in the performance and character of papayas production from the crosslines to the comparison parents, and it was found that the genotype USK1 (elder) and USK1 X USK7 (crossline) are genotype that have the preferred quality of the consumer based on qualitative quality, organoleptic test and the measurement of the sweetness of the fruit pulp (13.40 and 11.89 Brix).

| Views 29 |

The performance of several papaya genotypes (Carica papaya L.) as crossing results

Aisyah S. 2002. Pengkajian umur petik dan kualitas empat varietas pepaya (Carica  papaya L.). Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.

Aravind D, Bhowmik, Duraivel, Harish. 2013. Traditional and medicinal uses of Carica papaya. Journal of Medicinal Plants. India 1(1), 7-15.

Hafsah S, Sastrosumarjo S, Sujiprihati S, Sobir, Hidayat SH. 2007. Daya gabung dan heterosis ketahanan pepaya (Carica papaya L.) terhadap penyakit antraknosa. Buletin Agronomi. 35(3), 194-204.

International Board Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR). 1988. Descriptors for Papaya. Rome: 34 p.

Millind P, Gurditta. 2011. Basketful benefits of papaya. International Research Journal of Pharmacy. India. Page 6-12.

Muliyani S. 2010. Karakterisasi lima genotipe papaya hibrida di kebun percobaan IPB Tajur. Fakultas Pertanian Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Papaya Australia. 2007. Papaw and Papaya. homepage for papaya Australia.

www.australianpapaya.com.au/index.php

Poespodarsono S. 1988. Dasar-dasar Ilmu Pemuliaan Tanaman. PAU-IPB Bekerjasama  dengan Lembaga Sumber Daya Informasi Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor. 163 hal.

Pusat Perlindungan Varietas Tanaman. 2006. Panduan Pengujian Individual: Kebaruan, Keunikan, Keseragaman dan Kestabilan Pepaya (Carica papaya L.). Pusat Perlindungan Varietas Tanaman. Departemen Pertanian RI.

Rahmatillah. 2016. Karakterisasi morfologi dan pendugaan parameter genetik beberapa genotipe pepaya (Carica papaya L.). Universitas Syiah Kuala. Banda Aceh.

Rosalina S. 2011. Keragaan fenotipe tanaman jagung hasil persilangan: studi heritabilitas beberapa sifat tanaman jagung. Universitas Jember. Jember.

Soemartono, Nasrullah, Hartiko H. 1992. Genetika Kuantitatif dan Bioteknologi Tanaman. Program PAU Bioteknologi UGM. Yogyakarta.

Subharandhu S, Nontaswatsri C. 1997. Combining ability analysis of some characters of introduced and local papaya cultivars. Scientia Hort. 71, 203–212.

Sujiprihati S, Syukur M, Yunianti R. 2006. Analisis stabilitas hasil tujuh populasi jagung manis menggunakan metode Additive Main Effect Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI). Buletin Agronomi. (34)(2), 93-97.

Syukur M, Sujiprihati S, Yunianti R. 2015. Teknik Pemuliaan Tanaman Edisi Revisi. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.

Suketi KR, Poerwanto S, Sujiprihati, Sobir, Widodo WD. 2010. Studi karakter mutu buah  pepaya IPB.  Jurnal Hortikultura. Indonesia 1(1), 17–26.

Sunyoto, Octriana L, Budiyanti T. 2014. Keragaman Penampilan Fenotipe Enam Genotipe Pepaya Hasil Persilangan. Balai Penelitian Tanaman Buah Tropika. Solok. Widyariset. 17(3), 303–310.

Rahayu Eka Sari, Siti Hafsah, Bakhtiar.
The performance of several papaya genotypes (Carica papaya L.) as crossing results.
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res. 12(6), 64-69, June 2018.
https://innspub.net/ijaar/performance-several-papaya-genotypes-carica-papaya-l-crossing-results/
Copyright © 2018
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
https://innspub.net
brand
innspub logo
english language editing
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Publish Your Article
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Submit Your Article
INNSPUB on FB
Email Update