The effect of nickel sulphate on bone composition in mice

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2019
Views (614)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The effect of nickel sulphate on bone composition in mice

Khalid H. Gathwan, Ahmed Anwar Albir
Int. J. Biosci. 14(1), 183-185, January 2019.
Keywords: Bone, Femur, Nickel sulphate
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

To find the effect of Nickel sulphate of the bone of mice.In this study the animals were divided into control and three experimental groups I, II and III according to the dose of nickel sulphate (NiSO4) administered orally to them i.e. 5.1, 11.7 and 24.2 mg/kg body weight, respectively. The femur bones were obtained by sacrificing the animals three weeks after weaning them once a week. The percentage loss between the wet weight and dry weight of femur in experimental groups I, II and III, the percentage loss was 31.6+1.6, 34.2+1.9 and 36.8+2.6 respectively, while in control animals was found to be 29.5+1.5. In the three experimental groups the percentage loss between the wet weight in wet water and dry weight in wet water was in the three 38.6+1.7, 41.5+2.8 and 49.1+2.9 respectively in the three experimental groups and 33.1+2.4 in the control group. Results indicates that there was a low deposition of bone mass (10-16%) due to the effect of nickel sulphate.

Abass SM. 2013. Surface properties 0f heat treated with differents duration of titanium Alloy dential implants. Journal of College of Dentistry 25(3).

Al-Rawi NH, Al-Talabani NG. 2005. Quantitative analysis of trace elements in saliva of oral cancer patients from Iraq. Journal of College of Dentistry, 17 (2).

Chettle DR. 1981. Lead in bone– sampling and quantitation using x–rays. Environ. Health Perspect. Feb. 91, 49–55.

Deluca HF. 1977. Vitamin D endocrine system. “Advances in clinical chemistry.” Academic press, London 125–174.

Gathwan KH, Khalil I, Talal S. 2018. Inhibitory effect of nickel nitrate on bone Compostion, Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 17(2), 58-59.

Glimcher MJ. 1959. Molecular biology of mineralized tissues with particular reference to bone. Review in Medical Physiology42, 359–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.31.359

Gony JK, Arnold JS, Cohn SH. 1964. Composition of trabecular and cortical bone. The Anatomical Record 149(3), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091490303

Hock JM. 1986. Stimulation of under mineralized matrix formation by 2, 5– dihydroxy vitamin D3 in long bone of rats. Classified Tissue International, 38(2), 79–86.

Katz JL. 1980. The structure and biomechanics of bone in mechanical properties of biological materials. Cambridge University Press, p 137–168.

Lacher TF, Goldstein MI. 1997. Tropical ecotoxicology status and needs. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry 16(1), 100.-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620160111

Lakes R. 1993. Materials with structural hierarchy. Nature 361, 511-515.

Mailman RB. 1980. Introduction to environmental Toxicology. Elsevier, New York, p 43.

Pidaparti RMV, Chandram A, Takano Y. Turner, CH. 1996. Bone mineral lies mainly outside collagen fibrils: Predictions of a composite mode/ for osteonal bone. Journal of Biochemistry 29, 909–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(95)00147-6

Povilles JM. 1989. What to expect from the measurement of bone mass. Revue du rhumatisme et des maladies ostéo-articulaires 56, 479–485.

Yamaguchi M, Oishi H, Suketa Y. 1987. Stimulators effect of zinc on bone formation in tissue culture. Biochemical Pharmacology 36, 4007–4012. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(87)90471-0

Related Articles

Extraction of biologically active substances of fungi isolated from various ecosystems and evaluation of their effect

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, G. A. Tomuyeva, A. R. Hasanova, V. Y. Hasanova, A. M. Hasanov, S. E. Nagiyeva, A. G. Eyvazov, G. T. Huseynova, G. A. Qasimova, V. K. Isayeva, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 143-150, February 2026.

Integrative role of yeast culture metabolites in aquatic health and productivity

Sajjad Ur Rahman, Dur E Nayab, Rabia Kanwar*, Muhammad Mukarram Bashir, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 126-142, February 2026.

Land use efficiency and performance of sweet corn-cowpea intercropping influenced by temporal planting and methods of fertilizer application

Bryan Cristian M. Demolar, Marissa C. Hitalia*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 101-125, February 2026.

Illuminating the deficiency: Public awareness of vitamin- D in Lahore, Pakistan

Muhammad Zeeshan Arif*, Muhammad Arslan Shahid, Zeerak Laila, Ahmad Ali Shabbir, Farrukh Nadeem, M Muazzam Khan, Yousuf Shahjahan, Rajab Ali, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 91-100, February 2026.

Characteristics of symbiotic relationships between plants and bacteria and the influence of stress factors on them

Konul F. Bakhshaliyeva, Navai D. İmamquliyev, Mehpara İ. Gasımova, Sevda M. Muradova, Panah Z. Muradov*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 75-90, February 2026.

In the line of fire: Unmasking the institutional challenges in the bureau of fire protection

Mhelen Grace F. Libre, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 53-74, February 2026.

One health approch: Diversity of domestic larval habitats and human responsibility in mosquito proliferation in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)

Zouéra Laouali, Kouamé Wilfred Ulrich Kouadio, Moussa Namountougou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 38-52, February 2026.

Linkages between land use change, flooding, and water quality in the Pallikaranai Marshland, Chennai, India

Arunpandiyan Murugesan, Roshy Ann Mathews, Aarthi Mariappan, J. Ranjansri, Rajakumar Sundaram, Prashanthi Devi Marimuthu*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 28-37, February 2026.