Impact of waste water of a pulp and paper industry on surrounding environment

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2017
Views (865)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Impact of waste water of a pulp and paper industry on surrounding environment

Fariah Khalid, Saamia Saif, Almas Hamid
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 10(2), 65-74, February 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

To fulfill the demands of ever increasing population it becomes essential to escalate the industrial development in our country.Pulp and paper industry is considered to be one of the most polluting industries. This industry not only produces paper but also generates a large amount of waste.This study was conducted to assess and analyze the water quality and waste water of Pulp and Paper industry and to determine the impact on nearby environment. Different techniques were used to analyze the parameters of water quality and waste water. The entire mill was surveyed to understand and observe its operations and theraw material used in it.Regular visits were planned in order to gather the required data .Sampling was done manually according to the method described by APHA (USA) standard method for analysis of water and waste water. Twenty-nine parameterswere selected to check the water quality. All drinking water quality parameters, except TDS, pH and Chlorine, from nearby environment complied with National Drinking Water Quality Standards. TDS values were 1050 mg/l, 1126 mg/l, 1135mg/l, pH values were 8.14, 8.9, 8.6 and Chlorine values were 0.6mg/l, 0.9mg/l, and 0.6mg/l. To analyze wastewater quality of industry thirty-one parameterswere selected. All the analyzed parameters except BOD, COD and Phenols were in compliance with NEQS. For the three wastewater sampling points, BOD values were 88mg/l, 86mg/l,and 90mg/l while COD were 251mg/l, 245mg/l, 268mg/l and Phenols were 0.201mg/l,0.212mg/l, and 0.217mg/l. It is concluded from the study that most of the parameters of drinking water and waste water are wellwithin limit set by NEQS which shows the efficiency of filtration and effluent treatment plant.

Bajpai P. 2000. Treatment of pulp and paper mill effluents with anaerobic technology. PIRA International, Leatherhead http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11788-1_2

Berry L. 2008. Chlorine: A Toxic Solution for the Production of White Paper.

DeZuane J. 1996. Handbook of Drinking Water Quality [Internet].2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons.

Ghosh AK. 2011. Theory and Application from Industrial Perspective. Fundamentals of Paper Drying. International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering and Management 12, 536-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/21594

Kesalkar VP, Khedikar IP, Sudame AM. 2012. Physico-chemical characteristics of wastewater from Paper Industry.International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications. 2, 137-143.

Pravin Sankar D, Vijula A. 2013. Industrial Pollution Monitoring System Using Labviewand GSM.International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering 2(6).

Sarma KB. 2014. A Case Study of the NagaonPaper Mill.Impact of Paper Industry on Environment.

Stacia T. 2002. Disinfection Byproduct Risk in Drinking Water treated with a Booster Chlorination Scheme [Internet]. [cited 2015];international:[about 3 screens].availablefrom http://civil.colorado.edu/~silverst/REU/bodies/2002/Stacia/

Trived R, Raman KNS. 2002. Industrial Pollution and Environmental Management, Sci Pub .India. 2, 178-189.

Yaday KS. 2006. Human Health Implications Due to Water Toxicity by Pulp and Paper Mill.Journal of Human Ecology 20(2), 91-96.

Related Articles

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.

Above and below ground carbon stock assessment of natural and planted mangrove forest in Davao Occidental, Philippines

C. F. Mangaga*, W. T. Tatil, H. A. R. Quiaoit, P. D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 157-167, January 2026.

Extraction and characterization of distilled water from by-product of salt refinery processing

Analyn I. Diola*, Eric A. Cunanan, Irene A. De Vera, Christian Garret F. Aquino, Julie M. Agpaoa, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 151-156, January 2026.

Vulnerability to illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing: The case of the Talusan, Zamboanga Sibugay, Philippines

Angelica M. Darunday*, Judy Ann H. Fernandez, Shekinah L. Ogoc, Norlika D. Moti, Larry C. Herbito, Armi G. Torres, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 138-150, January 2026.

Socio-ecological dimensions of intertidal gleaning: The use of local ecological knowledge to identify commercially important gastropods in Iligan Bay, Philippines

Katrina Flores, Armi G. Torres, Wella T. Tatil, Ivane R. Pedrosa-Gerasmio*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 126-137, January 2026.

Conservation assessment of the marine ornamental fish species Pomacanthus imperator (Emperor angelfish) in the Philippines

Timothy Jan L. Adel*, Armi G. Torres, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 114-125, January 2026.

Land use conflicts: An impediment to improved agrifood value chain management as perceived by crop farmers in southeast Nigeria

J. U. Chikaire, C. C. Ejiogu, H. I. Duruanyim, T. O. Ogbuji, S. I. Ogbaa, A. O. Kalu, J. I. Ukpabi, A. Rufai, L. C. Izunobi, J. U. Okwudili, C. I. Anah, E. U. Omeire, I. O. Okeoma, J. Nnametu, U. G. Chris-Ejiogu, I. E. Edom, C. N. Atoma, U. S. Awhareno, E. C. Mube-Williams, S. O. Adejoh, A. D. Ude, J. O. Oparaojiaku, C. O. Osuagwu, E. E. Ihem, B. N. Aririguzo, E. C. C. Amaechi, M. N. Osuji, C. A. Acholonu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(1), 102-113, January 2026.