Implications in the rehabilitation of degraded watershed and rangeland in Hazara regions of Pakistan

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2016
Views (821)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Implications in the rehabilitation of degraded watershed and rangeland in Hazara regions of Pakistan

Sultan Muhammad, Kaleem Mehmood, Anwar Ali
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 9(1), 441-447, July 2016.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Hazara region is located in the north of Khyber pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Hazara region is one of the most important areas with respect to watershed and rangeland resources. The watershed and rangeland of the upper area of the region are being cleared for cultivation, grazing, fodder, fuel wood, and timber. Removal of vegetation on steep slopes in conjunction with intense monsoon rainfall has aided to massive erosion and landslides, resulting in deterioration of watershed and rangeland resources in particular and environment in general. Keeping in view the above situation, a local organization started support to locals for rehabilitation of environment through plantation of multipurpose tree species. The tree species were first raised in the nurseries and then provided to locals for restocking of deforested range land, watershed and wasteland. The study was arranged to study the impact of these restocking measures on the rehabilitation of degraded watershed and rangeland. The study concluded that local community mostly prefer to plant trees on their farmland or land which belong to individual due to their sole ownership and avoided rangeland and watershed due to communal ownership and interference in the use of these plants later on by the community. The study also indicates the purpose of plantation and fodder was found to be the most important among these due to dependence of the community on livestock. The study concluded that involvement of local community in the management of natural resources and integrating their local requirements are the keys of success for any rehabilitation program.

Ahmad S. 1993. Viability of agriculture resource base: A critical appraisal. In agricultural Strategies in the 1990s: Issues and options. Pakistan Association of Agricultural Social Scientists p. 449-466.

Ahmad S. 2001. Watershed Management in Pakistan: Achievements and Issue 1-17.

Chaudhary NP. 2008. Problem affecting pasture and rangeland management in the Himalayan region of Nepal. InProceedings of the XXI International Grassland Congress and the VIII International Rangeland Congress (Volumeii).

El-Juhany, Loutfy I. 2009. Forestland degradation and potential rehabilitation in southwest Saudi Arabia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 33, p. 2677-2696.

Farooq U, Ahmad M, Jasra AW. 2007. Natural resource conservation, poverty alleviation, and farmer partnership. The Pakistan Development Review pp.1023-1049.

German L, Ayele S, Admassu Z. 2008. Managing linkages between communal rangelands and private cropland in the highlands of eastern Africa: contributions to participatory integrated watershed management. Society and Natural Resources 21(2), pp.134-151.

Kometa SS, Ebot MAT. 2012. Watershed degradation in the Bamendjin area of the North West Region of Cameroon and its implication for development. Journal of Sustainable Development 5(9), p.75.

Marquis G. 2015. Reducing disaster risk in Pakistan through watershed management. Unasylva 66. p. 243-244.

Megahan and Amjad Chima M. 1980. World Forestry: Watershed Management in Pakistan Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Forestry 78-4, p. 217-219.

Milton SJ, Dean WRJ, Richardson DM. 2003. Economic incentives for restoring natural capital in southern African rangelands. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1(5), pp. 247-254.

Monsen SB, McArthur ED. 1995. Implications of early intermountain range and watershed restoration practices (pp. 16-25).

Tabassum I, Rahman F. 2012. Degradation of Communal Natural Resources and their Impacts on Mountain Women: A Case Study of Karak District Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS) 32(1), pp.157-169.

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.