In vitro assessment of the prebiotic potential of Caulerpa lentillifera, Gracilaria arcuata, and Sargassum polycystum on probiotic Lactobacillus species

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2017
Views (1032)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

In vitro assessment of the prebiotic potential of Caulerpa lentillifera, Gracilaria arcuata, and Sargassum polycystum on probiotic Lactobacillus species

Kho MJN, Hernandez RBB, Ladera JPT, Khow DAT, Lagura VAM, Jacinto JAC, Medina PMB
Int. J. Biosci. 10(5), 382-388, May 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Macroalgae are rich in complex polysaccharides making them a good source of potential prebiotics – non-digestible polysaccharides that promote the growth of beneficial microorganisms in the gut. This study assessed the prebiotic potential of three common Southeast Asian macroalgal species: Caulerpa lentillifera, Gracilaria arcuata, and Sargassum polycystum, on isolated probiotic bacterial species Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei. The Competitive Growth Assay (CGA) of the two Lactobacillus species against the hospital-isolated Escherichia coli, done in Luria Broth with 2% glucose supplementation, was measured using the drop plate method on selective media. The following bacterial combinations for the CGA were: (1) L. casei + E. coli, (2) L. paracasei + E. coli, and (3) both Lactobacillus species + E. coli. Prebiotic potential was assessed by comparing the ratio of Lactobacillus species to E. coli pre- and post-treatment with macroalgae. Data showed that all three macroalgae exhibited significant prebiotic potential (p<0.05) when compared to no prebiotic (negative control), and their prebiotic potentials were comparable to the prebiotic potential of the commercially available prebiotic inulin (positive control). Furthermore, all macroalgae exhibited a significantly stronger prebiotic potential (p<0.05) on L. casei compared to L. paracasei. It is recommended that these macroalgae be part of the regular diet together with the probiotic L. casei. Furthermore, in vivo studies are encouraged to confirm if these macroalgae continue to exhibit their prebiotic effect.

Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources. 2010. Fisheries Commodity Roadmap: Seaweeds. Available from www.bfar.da.gov.ph/files/img /photos/roadmapseaweeds_wdcorrction2008.pdf. Accessed Nov. 13, 2016,

Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources. 2014. Philippine Fisheries Profile 2014. Available from http://www.bfar.da.gov.ph/files/img/photos /2014. Fisheries Profile (Final copy). pdf. Accessed Nov. 13, 2016.

Capra ML, Tibaldo MM, Vinderola G, Reinheimer JA, Quiberoni A. 2014. Technological and probiotic characterisation of Lactobacillus casei/paracasei strains and their phage-resistant mutants. Int. Dairy J 37, 39-47.

Critchley AT. 1993. Gracilaria (Rhodophyta, Gracilariales): an economically important agarophyte, pp. 89-112. In Ohno, M, Critchley AT (Eds.), Seaweed Cultivation and Marine Ranching, 1st Ed. Kanagawa Int. Fisheries Training Center and JICA, Nagai, Japan.

Espitia PJP, Batista RA, Azeredo HMC, Otoni CG. 2016. Probiotics and their potential applications in active edible films and coatings. Food Res. Int 90, 42-52.

Ganzon-Fortes ET. 2012. A historical account of biodiversity studies on Philippine seaweeds (1800-1999). Coast Mar Sci 35(1), 182-201.

Hardy H, Harris J, Lyon E, Beal J, Foey A. 2013. Probiotics, Prebiotics and Immunomodulation of Gut Mucosal Defences: Homeostasis and Immunopathology. Nutrients 5(6), 1869–912.

Hu B, Gong QN, Wang Y, Ma Y, Li J, Yu W. 2006. Prebiotic effects of neoagaro-oligosaccharides prepared by enzymatic hydrolysis of agarose. Anaerobe 12, 260-266.

Kuda T, Ikemori T. 2009. Minerals, polysaccharides and antioxidant properties of aqueous solutions obtained from macroalgal beach-casts in the No to Peninsula, Ishikawa, Japan. Food Chem 12(3), 575–81.

Laparra JM, Velez D, Montoro R, Barberá R, Farré R. 2003. Estimation of arsenic bioaccessibility in edible seaweed by an in vitro digestion method. J. Agric. Food Chem 51(20), 6080–5.

Lynch MB, Sweeney T, Callan JJ, O’Sullivan, JT, O’Doherty JV. 2010. The effect of dietary Laminaria derived laminarin and fucoidan on intestinal microflora and volatile fatty acid concentration in pigs. Livest Sci 133, 157-160.

Murphya P, Bello FD, O’Doherty J, Arendt EK, Sweeney T, Coffey A. 2013. The effect of liquid versus spray-dried Laminaria digitataex tract on selected bacterial groups in the piglet gastrointestinal tract (GIT) microbiota. Anaerobe 21, 1-8.

Nagpal R, Kaur A. 2011. Synbiotic Effect of Various Prebiotics on In Vitro Activities of Probiotic Lactobacilli. Ecol Food Nutr 50(1), 63–8.

Ortiz A, Trono Jr. G. 2007. Growth and Reproductive Pattern of Intertidal and Subtidal Sargassum (Sargassaceae, Phaeophyta) Populations in Bolinao, Pangasinan. Sci Diliman 12(2), 45-50.

Pulz O, Gross W. 2004. Valuable products from biotechnology of microalgae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 65(6), 635–48.

Slavin J. 2013. Fiber and Prebiotics: Mechanisms and Health Benefits. Nutrients 5(4), 1417–1435.

Sweeney T, Dillon S, Fanning J, Egan J, O’Shea CJ, Figat S, Gutierrez JJM, Mannion C, Leonard F, O’Doherty JV. 2011. Evaluation of seaweed-derived polysaccharides on indices of gastrointestinal fermentation and selected populations of microbiota in newly weaned pigs challenged with Salmonella typhimurium. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 165, 85-94.

Wang Y, Han F, Hu B, Li JB, Yu WG. 2006. In vivo prebiotic properties of alginate oligosaccharides prepared through enzymatic hydrolysis of alginate. Nutr Res 26, 597-603.

Zaporozhets TS, Besednova NN, Kuznetsova TA, Zvyagintseva TN, Makarenkova ID, Kryzhanovsky SP, Melnikov VG. 2014. The prebiotic potential of polysaccharides and extracts of seaweeds. Russ J Mar Biol 40(1), 1–9.

Related Articles

Optimizing soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) performance through rhizobial inoculation and planting density in Kétou, Benin

Mahougnon Charlotte Carmelle Zoundji*, Ibouraïman Balogoun, Pascal Gbenou, Tobi Moriaque Akplo, Carlosse Djeho, Félix Kouélo Alladassi, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 99-107, June 2026.

Genetic admixture and the philosophy of diplomacy in central Asia: Evidence from intercultural dialogue, governance and genomic data

Shafee Ur Rehman, Waqar Ahmed Khan, Iqra Jamil, Muhammad Abdullah, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 89-98, June 2026.

Synthesizing and integrating environmental awareness and bio-intensive gardening under the Gulayan sa Paaralan (SIBUG) extension project

Violeta F. Collado*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, Marilyn D. Respicio, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 82-88, June 2026.

Diversity of insects related to maize (Zea mays) production in Ferkéssédougou region, Côte d’Ivoire

Fondio Drissa, Dao Hassane, Soro Lacina*, Sib Ollo, Kouadio Roger Hosphade Kouassi, Soro Senan, Yeboue N’guessan Lucie, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 75-81, June 2026.

Diuretic activity assessment of an aqueous extract of Zanthoxylum gilletii (Rutaceae) stem bark in rats

Akoua Jeanne Kanga*, Essoi Kouametchi Hermann, Françoise Assamala Fossou, Kacou Jules Marius Djetouan, Kouao Augustin Amonkan, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 68-74, June 2026.

Phytochemical investigation and in vitro evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Aglaonema hookerianum stems

K. M. Monirul Islam, Simin Shabnam Lopa, Joya Rani, Md. Aslam Sheikh, Md. Golam Sadik*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 60-67, June 2026.

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.