Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

In vitro evaluation of the nutritional value of sunflower disc florets for ruminants

Research Paper | February 1, 2013

| Download 4

Mohammad Narimani Rad, Mortaza Kiyani Nahand, Habib Aghdam Shahryar, Alireza Lotfi

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.3( 2), 99-103, February 2013

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/3.2.99-103


IJB 2013 [Generate Certificate]


The aim of present study was to estimating nutritional value of fresh or dried sunflower disc florets (SFDF) using in vitro gas production technique. Three fistulated native bulls fed experimental rations twice daily for 15 days, and ruminal fluid was collected for using in in vitro fermentation. Gas production of in vitro fermentation was measured as the volume of gas in the calibrated syringes and was recorded before incubation 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after incubation. Total gas values were corrected for blank incubation which contained only rumen fluid. The fresh SDFD has significantly more fermentation potential when compared with dried SDFD. All of gas production fractions (soluble, insoluble, and potential gas production value) are greater for fresh SFDF in comparison with dried SFDF. Also, all of energy indices include organic matter digestibility (OMD), metabolizable energy (ME), short chain fatty acids (SCFA), and net energy for lactation (NEL) are significantly greater for fresh SFDF. It can be concluded that fresh sunflower disc floret (as a sunflower seed by-product) can be used in ruminant nutrition. However, drying of this feedstuff can decrease its nutritional value.


Copyright © 2013
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

In vitro evaluation of the nutritional value of sunflower disc florets for ruminants

Abaş I, özpinar H, Kutay C, Kahraman R. 2005. Determination of the metabolizable energy (ME) and net energy lactation (NEL) contents of some feeds in the Marmara region by in vitro gas technique. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 29, 751-757.

Anandan S, AnilKGK, Rudraswamy MS, Rama chandra KS. 2002. In vitro evaluation of sunflower heads based complete feeds. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 19, 374- 377.

Anonymous. 2013. Nutritional evaluation of sunflower straw and plate on sheep. Agricultural Science Paper. p. 172.

AOAC    (Association     of    Official     Analytical Chemists). 1990. Official Method of Analysis. 15th. edition Washington DC. USA, p. 66-88.

Dinusson WE, Haugse CN, Erickson DO, Knutson RD. 1973. Sunflower hull and corn roughage pellets, triticale and ergot in rations for beef cattle. Farm Research 30, 35-39.

Lardy G, Anderson V. 2009. Alternative feeds for ruminants. General concepts and recommendations for using alternative feeds. North Dakota State University Fargo, AS-1182 (Revised), p. 24.

Mafakher A, Meskarbashi M, Hasibi P, Mashayekhi R, Baghaeipour J. 2010. Evaluation of chemical composition and physical traits of ensiled corn and sunflower in different ratios. In proceeding of 4th Iranian Congress of Animal Science, p. 1601-1604.

McGuffey RK, Schingoethe DJ. 1980. Feeding value of high oil variety of sunflower as silage to lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 1109-1113.

Menke KH, Steingass H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development 28, 7-55.

Ørskov ER, McDonald P. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Agricultural Sciences (Cambridge) 92, 499-503.

Park CS, Erickson DO, Fisher GR, Haugse CN. 1982. Effects of sunflower hulls on digestibility and performance of growing dairy heifers fed varying amounts of protein and fibre. Journal of Dairy Science 65(1), 52-58, http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82152-8

Pritchard RH, Robbins MA. 1990. Use of sunflower hulls as the roughage component of finishing diets for yearling steers. In: South Dakota beef report, South Dakota State University, Brookings: 9-11.

SAS, Statistical Analysis System. 2000. User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.1, SAS Institute, NC, USA.

Sharma BK, Clark AK, Drackley JK, Sahlua T, Schingoethe DJ. 1988. Digestibility in vitro and by sheep of sunflower hulls treated with sodium, potassium and ammonium hydroxides. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 68, 987-992.

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JD, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal’s nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583-3597.