home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Inferring zonation in mangrove ecosystem via leaf size indices in Rhizophora apiculata Blume

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2018
Views (300) Download (24)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Inferring zonation in mangrove ecosystem via leaf size indices in Rhizophora apiculata Blume

Cornelio S. Casilac Jr, Shiella Lynn G. Dali-On, Edwin C. Escobal, Lowell G. Aribal
J. Bio. Env. Sci.13( 3), 134-140, September 2018.
Certificate: JBES 2018 [Generate Certificate]
Key: Leaf sizeMangrovesMorphometricsNutrientsZonation

Abstract

The present study intends to establish the relationship between the leaf size indices of Rhizophora apiculata relative to the zonation of the mangrove ecosystem in Masapelid Island. A transect line with 20 meters width and 160 meters length was established from the sandy soils up to the seaward zone of the forest. The transect was further subdivided into zones based on the typical species zonation patterns with the first zone covering 20 meters from the shore comprising the landward; the second zone considered as the middle covers from >20 to 60 meters while the third zone was the seaward zone includes >60 meters up to where mangrove species still exist. The leaves in every first branch of these species were collected in each zone to determine the variables such as length, width, thickness, and area. Collected samples then undergo tissue analysis to determine the nutrient status. The result shows that except for leaf thickness, a negative correlation between the zones was observed. This implies that the leaf length, area, and width decreases towards the seaward zone. In contrary, the leaf thickness showed a positive correlation which would mean increasing leaf thickness towards the seaward. Moreover, the leaf length and area were negatively correlated to nitrogen and phosphorus which implies that increasing amounts would lead to lower length and area while K has an opposite effect. Despite the seemingly decreasing trend observed,however, LSI, in this case,could not be the reliable indicator to demarcate zonations in the mangrove ecosystem.

VIEWS 15
Cover PDF

Agaloos BD. 1994. Reforestation of mangrove forest in the Philippines. In Proc. of ITTO: Development and dissemination of reforestation technique of mangrove forest, Japan.

Aksornkoae S. 1993. Ecology and management of mangroves.IUCN Wetlands Programme.IUCN, Bangkok, Thailand 176 pp.

Amaliyah S, Hariyanto S, Ournibasuki H. 2018. Growth responses of RhizophoraapiculatBlumein different soil and sediment conditions. AACL Bioflux, 2018, Volume 11, Issue 2.

Aribal LG, Bonggay JS, Fernando ES. 2017. Leaf size indices and structure of the peat swamp forest, Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage 3(1), 63-74, Winter 2017 DOI: 10.22034/gjesm.2017.03.01.007

Buot IEJR, Okitsu S. 1999. Leaf size zonation pattern of woody species along an altitudinal gradient on Mt. Pulog, Philippines. Kluver Academic Publishers. Plant Ecol 145, 197-208

Cain SA, De Oliveira, Castro GM. 1959. Manual of vegetation analysis. Harper and Brothers Publishers, New York.

Chapman VJ. 1976. Mangrove Vegetation. J. Cramer, Valduz 447 pp.

Dayton PK, Tegner M. 1984 – The importance of scale in community ecology: a kelp forest example with terrestrial analogs. In A New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems. Price, P. W., Sobodchikoff, C. N. and W. S. Gaud (Eds). New York; Wiley 457-481

Dayton PK. 1971. Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Eco/Monogr 41(4), 351-389 (38 pages).

De-Lima CS, Boeger MR, De-Carvalho LL, Pelozzo A, Soffiatti P. 2013. Sclerophylly in mangrove tree species from South Brazil. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84, 1159-1166. DOI: 10.7550/rmb.32149

Egler FA. 1950. Southeast saline Everglades vegetation, Florida, and its management Vegetation 3, 213-265

Friess D, Mangrove, Forests A. 2016. Current Biology 26, R739–R755 (16 pages).

Giesen W, Wulffraat S, Zieren M, Scholten L. 2006. Mangrove Guidebook for Southeast Asia. RAP Publication 2006/07.

Giri C. 2011. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob Ecol. Bio. geogr 20, 154-159 (5 pages).

Hossain MD,  Nuruddin AA. 2016. Soil and Mangrove: A Review. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Volume 9(2), 198-207, 2016.

Hutchings P, Saenger P. 1987. Ecology of Mangroves. University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia.

Louda SM. 1989. Differential predation pressure: a general mechanism for structuring plant communities along complex environmental gradients. Trends Ecol Evol 4,158-159

Lugo AE, Cintrón G, Goenaga C. 1981. Mangrove ecosystems under stress. In W. Barrett and R. Rosenberg (Eds.), Stress Effects on Natural Ecosystems (pp. 129-153). Great Britain: John Wiley and and Sons Ltd.

Lugo AE, Snedaker SC. 1974. The ecology of mangroves. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5, 39-64

Medina E, Fernandez W, Barboza F. 2015. Element uptake, accumulation, and restoration in leaves of mangrove species with different mechanisms of salt regulation, Web Ecol 15, 3-13, 2015 www.web-ecol.net/15/3/2015  DOI: 10.5194/we-15-3-2015

Menge BA, Olson AM. 1990. Role of scale and environmental factors in the regulation of community structure. Trends Ecol. Evol 5, 52-57

Menge BA, Sutherland JP.. 1987. Community regulation: variation in disturbance, competition, and predation in relation to environmental stress and recruitment. Am. Naturalist 130, 730-757

Menge, B. A. and T. M. Farrell. 1989. Community structure and 1I1teractIOn webs 111shallow marine hard-bottom communities: tests of an environmental stress model. Adv. ecol. Res 19, 189-262 (73 pages).

Miles D, Kolpol U, Chittawong V, Tip-Pyang S, Tunsuwan K, Nguyen C. 1999. Mangrove Forests- The importance of Conservation as a Bioresource for Ecosystem Diversity and Utilization as a Source of Chemical constituents with potential medicinal and Agricultural Value. © 1999 IUPAC.

Naidoo G. 2010. Ecophysiological differences between fringe and dwarf Avicennia marina mangroves. Trees 24, 667-673 (6 pages).

Pallardy SG. 2008. Physiology of woody plants. 3rd Edition. Elsevier, USA.

Peel MC Snchez JL Portillo and Golubov J. 2017. Stomatal density, leaf area and plant size variation of Rhizophora mangle along a salinity gradient in the Mexican Caribbean. Volume 65, No. 2, 2017.

Pickett STA, Kempf JS. 1980. Branching Patterns in Forest Shrubs and understory trees in relation to habitat, New Phyto. (1980) 86, 219-228 (9 pages).

Primavera JH. 2000. Development and conservation of Philippine mangroves: institutional issues. Ecol Econ 35, 91-106 (15 pages).

Raunkiaer C. 1934. The Lifeforms of plants and statistical plant geography. London, Clarendon.

Reef R, Schuerch E, Christie I, Moller, Spencer T. 2010. The tidal regime, salinity and salt marsh plant zonation.

Richards DR, Friess DA. 2012. Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000-2012. 344-349 | PNAS | January 12, 2016, | vol. 113, no. 2. (5 pages).

Silvestri S, Defina A, Marani M. 2005, Tidal regime, salinity and salt marsh plant zonation, Estuarine Coast. Shelf.Sci  62, 119-130.

Singh G. 2010. Plant Systematics. ISBN 978-1-57808-668-9.

Snedaker SC. 1982. Mangrove species zonation: why? In: Sen, D.N., Rajpurohit, K.S. (Eds.), Tasks for Vegetation Science, 2. Dr. W.Junk Publishers, The Hague pp. 111-125 (14 pages).

Sousa WP. 1979. Disturbance in marine intertidal boulder fields: the nonequilibrium maintenance of species diversity. Ecology 60(6), 1225-1239 (14 pages).

Spalding M, Kainuma M, Collins L. 2010. World Atlas of Mangroves (Earthscan, London).

Stephenson TA, Stephenson A. 1972 – Life between Tidemarks on Rocky Shores. San Francisco; Freeman 425 pp.

Tilman D. 1988. Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA pp. 360.

Tomlinson PB. 1986. The Botany of Mangroves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Traiser C, Klotz S, Uhl D, Mosbrugger V. 2005. Environmental signals from leaves–a physiognomic analysis of European vegetation. New Phyto 166(2), 464-484 (21 pages).

Underwood A, Denley EJ, Moran MJ. 1983. Experimental analyses of the structure and dynamics of mid-shore rocky intertidal communities in New South Wales. Oecologia 56(2+3), 202-219 (17 pages).

Van CG, Steenis GJ. 1958. Ecology of mangroves. Introduction to account of the Rhizophoraceae by Ding Hou. Flora Malesiana, Ser. I, 5, 431-441 (10 pages).

Walsh GE. 1974. Mangroves: a review. In: Reinhold, R.J., Queen, W.H. (Eds.), Ecology of Halophytes. Academic Press, New York pp. 51-174 (123 pages).

Watson JG. 1928. Mangrove forests of the Malay peninsula. Malay For Rec 6, 1-275 (275 pages).

Webb LJ. 1959. A physiological classification of the Australian rainforest. J. Eco 47, 551-570 (19 pages).

Yates E, Ashwath H, Midmore D. 2002. Responses to nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sodium chloride by three the mangrove species in pot culture. Trees 16, 120-1.

Submit Manuscript