Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | October 1, 2015

| Download 1

Influence of foliar fertilizing on stomata parameters in maize leaf (Zea mays L.)

Hristina Poposka, Silvana Manasievska Simikj, Marina Stojanova, Dusko Mukaetov

Key Words:

Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.7(4), 68-74, October 2015


IJAAR 2015 [Generate Certificate]


In this research, the effects of foliar fertilizer Megegreen on stomata parameters of maize leaf (ZP 677) were studied. The experiment was performed on the experimental fields of the Institute of Agriculture, in Skopje, R. of Macedonia, during the 2008 and 2009. The foliar fertilizer was applied four times during the growing period in different concentrations of 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9% solution. Stomata density and size were measured on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surface from randomly selected plants from each replication in stage of silking. Stomata counts were made on the impressions from microscopic fields using the colodium method. Analyses of variance indicated that the application of foliar fertilizer has significant influence on stomata features on corn leaves. Results from research, show higher stomata density on adaxial (176,19-182,32 stomata/mm2) and abaxial surface (289,12-293,12 stomata/mm2) at variants 3 and 4. Variant 3 has the highest stomata length on adaxial surface (59,75 μm), without significant difference and the highest average length on the abaxial surface (63,00 μm), which is significantly different from the control variant. With the highest average width on adaxial leaf surface was variant 4 with 11,56 μm and on the abaxial surface was variant 2, with 13,49 μm. A positive significant correlation was observed between stomata number on the adaxial and abaxial surface of leaf (R2= 0,856**).


Copyright © 2015
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Influence of foliar fertilizing on stomata parameters in maize leaf (Zea mays L.)

Angelov I, Matvejeva J, Stankovic L, Kratovalieva S. 1995. Morphology and distribution of stomatas at some hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.). Macedonian Agricultural review 42(2), 87-93.

Brent EE, Ram O. 2000. Analyses of assumptions and errors in the calculation of stomatal conductance from sap flux measurements. Tree Physiology 20, 579589.

Farquhar GD, Buckley TN, Miller JM. 2002. Optimal stomatal control in relation to leaf area and nitrogen content. Silva Fennica 36(3), 625-637.

Franks PJ, Buckley TN, Shope JC, Mott KA. 2001. Guard cell volume and pressure measured concurrently by confocal microscopy and the cell pressure probe. Plant Physiology 125, 1577-1584.

Hetherington AM, Woodward FI. 2003. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424, 901-908.

Holland N, Andrew D, Richardson. 2009. Stomatal length correlates with elevation of growth in four temperate species. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28, 63-73.

Lecoeur J, Wery J, Turc O, Tardieu F. 1995. Expansion of pea leaves subjected to short water-deficit: cell number and cell-size are sensitive to stress at different periods of leaf development. Journal of Experimental Botany 46, 1093–1101.

Levitt J. 1968. Stomatal opening: rolle of potassium uptake. Science 163, 494.

Kastori R, Petrović M. 1972a. The effect of some biogenic elements on the stomatal apparatus in maize plants. Matica srpska Novi Sad 42, 124-135.

Maherali H, Reid CD, Polley HW, Johnson HB, Jachson RB. 2002. Stomatal acclimation over a subambient to elevated CO2 gradient in a C3/C4 grassland. Plant, Cell and Environment 25, 557–566.

Melotto M, Underwood W, Koczan J, Nomura K, He SY. 2006. Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion. Cell 126, 969-980.

Miranda V, Baker NR, Long SP. 1981. Anatomical variation along the length of the Zea mays leaf in relation to photosynthesis. New Phytologist 88, 595-605.

Nilson SE, Assmann SM. 2007. The control of transpiration. Insights from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 143, 19-27.

Paiva EA, Lemos-Filho JP, Oliveira DM. 2006. Imbition of Swietenia macrophylla (Meliaceae) seeds: The role of stomata. Annals of Botany 98, 213-217.

Pandey R, Chacko PM, Choudhary ML, Prasad KV. 2007. Higher than optimum temperature under CO2 enrichment influences stomata anatomical characters in rose (Rosa hybrida). Scientia Horticulturae 113, 74-81.

Sarić RM. 1971. Plant Phisiology, Novi Sad.

Sarić M, Kastori R, Petrović M, Stanković Z, Krstić B, Petrović N. 1986. Practical physiology of plants, Scientific Book, Beograd.

Sarić M, Krstić B, Stanković ZJ. 1991. Plant Phisiology, Science, Beograd.

Zhenzhu X, Guangsheng Z. 2008. Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. Journal of Experimental Botany 59(12), 3317–3325.


Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background