Influence of Rhizobium inoculation on nodules, growth and yield of french beans cultivars

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2016
Views (1025)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Influence of Rhizobium inoculation on nodules, growth and yield of french beans cultivars

Imtiaz Ahmed, Muhammad Abbas Khan, Naveed Ahmed, Noorullah Khan, Sajjad Khan, Fazal Yazdan Saleem Marwat
Int. J. Biosci. 9(6), 226-233, December 2016.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

To study the influence of Rhizobium inoculation on nodules, growth and yield of French beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars, an experiment was conducted at National Tea and High value crops research Institute (NTHRI) Shinkiari, Mansehra during 2016. Seeds of three different cultivars of French bean i.e ‘Evergreen’, ‘Komal green’ and ‘Winner’ were inoculated with Rhizobium in main plot; whereas cultivars kept in sub plots in order to evaluate various growth parameter and yield. The Rhizobium inoculation significantly enhanced the growth and yield parameter of French beans cultivars. Maximum germination percentage (90.01%), plant height (29.55 cm), plant spread (27.55 cm), number of nodules (27.22 plant-1), number of branches    (6.38 plant-1 ), number of pods (41.83 plant-1), pods length (20 cm) and yield (5939.4 kg ha-1) was observed in synthetic Rhizobium inoculated seeds. Evergreen cultivars of French beans showed best result i.e. maximum germination percentage (89.48), plant height (28.83cm), plant spread (25.83 cm), pods length (18.95 cm) l, number of branches (6.38 plant-1), number of pods (40.80 plant-1), number of nodules (25.00 plant-1) and yield (5810.8 kg ha-1). All the parameter of growth and yield showing best result for synthetic Rhizobium inoculation of seeds while among the cultivar ‘Evergreen’ is best for cultivation.

Ahmed S, Habib G, Muhammad Y, Ullah I, Durrani Z, Pervaiz U, Rehman, A. 2009. Effect of seed scarification, Rhizobium inoculation and phosphorus fertilization on root development of barseem and soil composition. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 25(3), 369-374.

Birjdar AM. 2006. Report on French bean Shetiwadi-News 2006.

Boivin, Catherine, Ibrahima N, Flore M, Philippe d, Nicolas D, Bernard D, Frans JB. 1997. Stem nodulation in legumes: diversity, mechanisms, and unusual characteristics. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 16, 1-30.

Brar J, Lal PB. 1991. Effect of Rhizobium inoculation, phosphorus and molybdenum yield and its components in mungbean. Indian Agriculturist 35, 67-69.

Brooks CB, Dadson RB, Green BM. 1988. Evaluation of symbiotic effectiveness of elite and wild strains of brady Rhizobium on cultivars of S (L). Agriculture Department USA 65(1), 61-63.

FAO. 2014. FAOSTAT: FAO statistical databases. Date Accessed 22.07.2016. http:faostat.fao.org/faostat/. Last Updated.

Gentilli F, Huss-Danell K. 2003. Loca and systemic effects of phosphorus and nitrogen on nodulation and nodule formatting in Alnus incana, Journal of Experimental Biology 54, 5727-2767.

Hanzell, EF. 1988. The role of biological nitrogen fixation research in solving problems in tropical agriculture. Plant and Soil 108, 15-21.

Jagvir S, Deshmukh MS, Tandulkar NR. 2004. Direct and Residual effect of sulphur in cotton-wheat cropping system in sandy soil. Fertilizer News 49, 61-63.

Jensen ES, Hauggaard-Nielsen H. 2003. How can increased use of biological N­2 fixation in agriculture benefit the environment? Plant and Soil 252, 177-186.

Kaplan L, Lynch TF. 1999. Phaseolus (Fabaceae) in archeology: AMS radiocarbohydrates Economic Botany 53, 261-272.

Kyei-Boahen S, Nleya TM, Hynes RK, Walley FL. 2005. Single and multistrain rhizobial inocula for pinto and black bean cultivars. Journal of Plant Nutrition 28, 1679-1692.

Ndakidemi PA, Dakora FD, Nkonya EM, Ringo D, Mansoor H. 2006. Yield and economic benefits of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soybean (Glycine max) inoculation in northern Tanzania. Animal Production Science 46, 571-577.

Pakistan G. 2014. Agriculture Statistics of Pakistan 2013-2014. Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Economic Wing, Islamabad.

Pandher MS, Seda RS, Gupta RP, Sharma SR. 1991. Response of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) inoculation with single and multi strain rhizobial inoculants. Indian Journal of Ecology 18, 113-117.

Rodriguez-Navarro DN, Santamarie C, Temprano F, Leidi EO. 1999. Interaction effects between Rhizobium strain and bean cultivar on nodulation, plant growth, biomass partitioning and xylem sap composition. European Journal of Agronomy 11, 131-143.

Sajid M, Rab A, Wahid F, Shah SNM, Jan IU, Khan MA, Hussain SA, Khan MA, Iqbal Z. 2011. Influence of Rhizobium inoculation on the growth and yield of groundnut cultivars. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 27(4), 573-576.

Silbernagel MJ, Janssen W, Davis JHC, Montes DOG, Oca GMD. 1991. Snap bean production in the tropics: implications for genetic improvement. In: van Schoonhoven A, Voysest O. (Eds). Common Beans: Research for Crop Improvement. Wallingford, UK and Cali, Columbia 835-862.

Tharkur AK, Panwar JDS. 1995. Effect of Rhizobium VAM interaction on growth and yield of mongbean (Vinga radiate L.) under field conditions. Indian Journal of Plant Pathology 38, 62-65.

Van der Maesen LJG, Somaatmadja S. 1989. Phaseolus vulgaris L. In van der Maesen LJG, Somaatmadja S. (Eds). Plant Resources of South-East Asia 1. Pulses. Wageningen: Pudoc/Prosea 60-63.

Voysest O, Dessert M. 1991. Bean cultivars, classes and commercial seed types. In: A. van Schoonhoven A, Voysest O. (Eds). Common Beans Research for Crop Improvement. Cali: CAB international, CIAT 19-162.

Wange SS, Karkeli MS, Patil JD. Meher BB. 1996. Effect of Rhizobial inoculation and fertilizer nitrogen on French bean varieties. Journal of Soils and Crops 6, 132-135.

Related Articles

Optimizing soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) performance through rhizobial inoculation and planting density in Kétou, Benin

Mahougnon Charlotte Carmelle Zoundji*, Ibouraïman Balogoun, Pascal Gbenou, Tobi Moriaque Akplo, Carlosse Djeho, Félix Kouélo Alladassi, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 99-107, June 2026.

Genetic admixture and the philosophy of diplomacy in central Asia: Evidence from intercultural dialogue, governance and genomic data

Shafee Ur Rehman, Waqar Ahmed Khan, Iqra Jamil, Muhammad Abdullah, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 89-98, June 2026.

Synthesizing and integrating environmental awareness and bio-intensive gardening under the Gulayan sa Paaralan (SIBUG) extension project

Violeta F. Collado*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, Marilyn D. Respicio, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 82-88, June 2026.

Diversity of insects related to maize (Zea mays) production in Ferkéssédougou region, Côte d’Ivoire

Fondio Drissa, Dao Hassane, Soro Lacina*, Sib Ollo, Kouadio Roger Hosphade Kouassi, Soro Senan, Yeboue N’guessan Lucie, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 75-81, June 2026.

Diuretic activity assessment of an aqueous extract of Zanthoxylum gilletii (Rutaceae) stem bark in rats

Akoua Jeanne Kanga*, Essoi Kouametchi Hermann, Françoise Assamala Fossou, Kacou Jules Marius Djetouan, Kouao Augustin Amonkan, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 68-74, June 2026.

Phytochemical investigation and in vitro evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Aglaonema hookerianum stems

K. M. Monirul Islam, Simin Shabnam Lopa, Joya Rani, Md. Aslam Sheikh, Md. Golam Sadik*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 60-67, June 2026.

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.