Influencing factors on attitude toward hydroponics cultivation viewpoint of experts

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/08/2014
Views (673)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Influencing factors on attitude toward hydroponics cultivation viewpoint of experts

Gholamreza Dinpanah, Azin Jamshidi, Farhad Lashgarara
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 5(2), 141-147, August 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine effect of factors on attitude toward hydroponics cultivation. The research population consisted of 176 experts in Agricultural Ministry, which were selected using census method. The methodological approach of this study was descriptive-correlative. Validity of the instrument was established by a panel of experts consisting of senior faculty members and research committee advisors. Reliability analysis was conducted by using Cronbach alpha formula and result was 0.83. The results showed that 7.1, 13.5 and 79.4 percent of experts expressed that their attitude toward hydroponics cultivation were weak, moderate and good respectively. Also the results of the multiple regression analysis (stepwise method) revealed that Policy making factors and economical factors explained a variation of 36.6 percent of attitude toward hydroponics cultivation.

Allaire S, Caron J, Duchesne I, Parent LE, Rioux JA. 2004. Growing media varying in particles size and shape for greenhouse tomato. Acta Hort. 644, 307-311.

Calpas J. 2001. Management of the greenhouse environment. Government of Alberta, Agriculture and rural development.

Cantliffe DJ, Funes J, Jovicich E, Parajpe A, Rodriguez J, Shaw N. 2007. Media and Containers for Greenhouse soil less grown cucumbers, Melons peppers and Strawberries. Acta Hort. 614, 199-203.

Franklin K, King J, Burton A, Brown S. 2010. Hydroponics around the world. Practical hydroponics and greenhouses, 45, 18-25.

Jaenaksorn T, Ikeda H. 2004. Possibility of substituting soil less fertilizer with soil fertilizer for growing leafy vegetable in Hydroponics. Acta Hort. 644, 351-357.

Janatan A. 2010. Commercial greenhouse vegetable production. University of California, Oakland.

Khoshgoftar A, Aghajani R, Hoseini F. 2008. Methods cultivation of soil less. Isfahan, Jahad of University, Isfahan unit. (in Farsi)

Latimer J, Scoggins H, Barden V, Lambur M. 2002. Needs Assessment Survey of the Virginia Greenhouse Industry .Virginia: Polytechnic Institute and State University. 24061-0402.

Mattson N. 2008. Needs Assessment Survey of the New York State Greenhouse Industry. New York: Department of Horticulture Plant Science Building. Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853.

Miceli A, Mancada A, Vetrano F, Danna F. 2003. First results on yield and quality response of Basil grown in a floating system. Acta Hort. 699, 377-381.

Papadopoulos I, Chatzitheodoridis F, Papadopoulos C. 2008. Evaluation of Hydroponic Production of Vegetables and Ornamental Pot-Plants in a Heated Greenhouse in Western Macedonia, Greece. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3, 559-565.

Paraskevopoulou G, Grafiadellis M. 1995. Precocity, Plant productivity and fruit quality of strawberry plant grown in soil and soil less culture. Mendeley. 408, 109.117.

Porterfield DM, Banks MK. 2009. Outdoor hydroponics growing of strawberries. Available on the: http://www.gardening-tips-idea.com/Outdoor-Hydroponics.html

Sanchez P, Oller S, Malato J, Maldonado W. 2002. The environmental relevance of capital goods in life cycle assessments of products and services. Plant and soil 86, 207-216.

Shariatmadar A. 2012. Agriculture-Jahad Ministry. Tehran, Interview. Date (5.2.2012). (in Farsi)

Takeda F. 2000. Out of-season greenhouse strawberry production in soil less substrate. Adv. in strawberry. Science 18, 4-15.

Verdonck O, Demeyer P. 2004. The influence of the particle size on the physical properties of growing media. Acta Hort. 644, 99-101.

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.