Interaction of weed composition and species abundance under different crop rotation pattern

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2018
Views (309) Download (10)

Interaction of weed composition and species abundance under different crop rotation pattern

Mark Joseph T. Mercado, Victoria C. Lapitan
J. Bio. Env. Sci.13( 1), 60-71, July 2018.
Certificate: JBES 2018 [Generate Certificate]


Weeds are one of the major concerns in agricultural production and weed survey served as baseline information for a strategic weed management system. Four season weed surveys were conducted to assess the effect of different cropping pattern on the weed composition and abundance and identified using different weed reference materials and analyze using PAST software 3.16. The study shows that weed composition in terms of species diversity and abundance varies as affected by the season, crop planted, stage of crop and cropping pattern. Weed species richness and abundance were observed higher in wet season than in dry season and during vegetative stage than in reproductive stage of the crop as affected by crop’s canopy cover and available soil moisture. Highest diversity index based on Shannon (H’=2.603) and Simpson (D=0.912) diversity index was found on reproductive stage of rice-corn plot during the 2016 wet season. Also, 2015 and 2016 wet season cropping had a significant difference (p=0.0012) in terms of its weed composition due to the crop rotation scheme. Some weed species were able to adapt different environmental condition that resulted in the complexity of the weed community and their persistence in the field. Lastly, the study revealed that crop rotation does not significantly reduce weed composition but it lowers the weed species abundance and lessens the weed dominance of some noxious weeds found in the field.


Acciaresi HA, Guiamet JJ. 2010. Below and above ground growth and biomass allocation in maize and Sorghum halepense in response to soil water competition. Weed Research 50, 481-492.

Adesina GO, Akinyemiju OA, Ola OT. 2012. Assessment of frequency, density and abundance of weed species in different cropping systems. Journal of Natural Sciences Research 2, 107-119.

Caton BP, Mortimer M, Hill JE, Johnson DE. 2010. A practical field guide to weeds of rice in Asia. Second edition. Los Banos (Philippines). International Rice Research Institute. 118 p.

Clements DR, Wise SF, Swanton CJ. 1994. Integrated weed management and weed species diversity. Phytoprotection75, 1-18.

Demjanova E, Macak M, Dalovic I, Majernik F, Tyr S, Smatama J. 2009. Effect of tillage system and crop rotation on weed density, weed species composition and weed biomass in maize. Agronomy Research 7, 785-792.

Derksen DA, Lafond GP, Thomas AG, Loeppky HA, Swanton CJ. 1993. The impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage system. Weed Science 41, 409-417.

Gharineh MH, Moosavi SA. 2010. Effects of Intercropping (Canola-Faba Bean) on density and diversity of weeds. NotulaeBiologicae2, 109-112.

Gbehounou G. 2013. Guidance on weed issues and assessment of the noxious weeds in a context of harmonized legistration for production of certified seeds. Plant Production and Protection Division. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

Hammer O. 2017. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4(1), 9 p.

Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP.1977. The world’s worst weeds. Distribution and biology. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: University Press of Hawaii.

Iijima K, Sago R.2005. Characteristics of the dominant species in secondary successions. Journal of Weed Science and Technology 50, 184-192.

Koo SJ, Chin DV, Kwon YW, Cung HA. 2005. Common weeds in Vietnam. Second Edition. Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam. 488 p.

Koocheki A, Nassiri M, Alimoradi L. and Ghorbani R. 2009.Effects of cropping systems and crop rotations on weeds. Agronomy for Sustainable Development.29, 401-408.

Macak M, Demjova E, Kovac K. 2005. Accompanying weed biodiversity in intensive agroecosystem. In proceeding from Traditional Agroecosystem- 1st International Conference, September 19-21, Nitra, FAO, 4-8.

Marenco RA, Santos AMB. 1999. Crop rotation reduces weed competition and increases chlorophyll concentration and yield of rice. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasiliera 34, 1881-1887.

Olorunmaiye P, Taiwo S, Alamu O, Egberongbe K, Adeoye P. 2013. Assessment of weed species composition and species diversity in some fruit orchards. Albanian Journal of Agricultural Science 12, 215-222.

Oudhia P. 2001.Phyto-sociological studies of rainy waste lands weed with reference to Parthenrium hysterophous L. in Raipur district (India). Asia Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences 3, 91-94.

Shen Q, Gao G, Fu B, Lu Y. 2014. Soil water content variations and hydrological relations of the cropland-treebelt-dessert land use pattern in an oasis-dessert ecotone of the Heihe River Basin, China. Catena 123, 52-61.

Simic M, Dragicevic V, Brankov M. 2017. Influence of growing measures on weed interference and water status in maize. Pesticide Phytomedicine (Belgrade) 32, 113-120.

Sit AK, Bhattacharya M, Sarkar B, Aruachalam V. 2007. Weed floristic composition in palm gardens in plains of eastern Himalayan region of West Bengal. Current Science 92, 1434-1439.

Stevenson FC, Legere A, Simard RR, Angers DA, Pageau D, Lafond J. 1997. Weed species diversity in spring barley varies with crop rotation and tillage but not with nutrient source. Weed Science 45, 798-806.

Zaman SF, Hussain LB, Wahab M. 2011.Floristics composition, communities and ecological characteristics of weeds of wheat field of Lahor, District Sabi, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43, 2817-2820.

Zahid H, Sabz AK, Khan BM, Iijaz AK, Ikramulla. 2004. Important weeds of wheat crop of Malankandher Farm. NWFP Agricultural University. Peshawar. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 10, 109-112.