Interannual litter study in Teak plantation site of Raigarh Forest, Chhattisgarh, India

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2013
Views (276) Download (10)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Interannual litter study in Teak plantation site of Raigarh Forest, Chhattisgarh, India

Garima Tiwari, Ajay K Singh
J. Bio. Env. Sci.3( 5), 41-46, May 2013.
Certificate: JBES 2013 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The Lakha teak plantation site has situated in sub tropical deciduous forest area of Chhattisgarh. Teak is a major tree species with 32 other forest tree species in the plantation site. The study of ground leaf litter production in respect to rainfall variation from 2005-2011 shows that the average (±se; n=20) annual leaf litter production varied between 881 and 1370 g dry mass m-2 year-1. The 70-90% litter was produced in the dry seasons and 55-70% in wet seasons. On annual basis mean (±se; n=20) the highest total litter fall production varied 7.67±0.31Mg/ha/year in 2009 and lowest 6.00±0.33 Mg/ha/year in 2011. The plantation floor litter mass found highest 6.54±0.31 Mg/ha in year 2006 and 5.03±0.25 Mg/ha in year 2010. The decomposition of litters found highest in annual rates 13.87±1.06 Mg/ha/year in 2005 and 11.08±0.84 Mg/ha/year in 2010.

VIEWS 9

Aerts R. 1997. Climate, leaf litter chemistry, and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: A triangular relationship. Oikos 79, 439–449.

Buresh RJ, Tian G. 1998. Soil improvement by trees in Sub-Saharan African. Agroforestry System 38, 51-76.

Cornejo FH, Varela A, Wright SJ. 1994. Tropical forest litter decomposition under seasonal drought: Nutrient release, fungi and bacteria. Oikos 70(2), 183-190.

Gaur JP, Pandey HN. 1978. Litter production in two tropical deciduous forest communities at Varanasi, India. Oikos 30 (3), 570-575.

Lai R. 2002. The potential of soils of the tropics to sequester carbon and mitigate green house effect. Advance Agronomy 76, 1-30.

Nayak ML, Srivastava BK. 1985. Leaf litter fall in the forest of Sarguja, Journal Tropical Forestry 11: 140-144.

Saleska SR. 2003. Carbon in Amazon forests: Unexpected seasonal fluxes and disturbance-induced losses. Science 302 (56), 1554– 1557.

Sanches L, Suli GS, Priante-Filho N, Vourlitis GL, De Nougueira JS. 2005.  I´ndice  de  a´rea foliar em floresta de transic¸a˜o Amazonia Cerrado, Rev. Cieˆncia Nat. 1, 37– 40.

Singh G, Arora YK, Narein P, Grewal SS. 1990. Agroforestry research (in India and other countries). Senya Publication.

Sunita M, Uma M. 1993. Environment and Agroforestry. India Farmer Digest 25(3), 29-36.

Sundarapandian SM, Swamy PS. 1999. Litter production and leaf litter decomposition of selected tree species in tropical forests at Kodayar in the Western Ghats, India, Forest Ecology and Management. 123, 231 – 244.

Vourlitis GL, De Nougueira JS, Priante-Filho N, Hoeger W, Raiter FM, Biudes S, Arruda JC, Capistrano VB, Faria JLB, Lobo FA. 2005. The sensitivity of dial CO2 and H2O vapor exchange of a tropical transitional forest to seasonal variation in meteorology and water availability, Earth Interact 9(27), 1.

Wieder K, Wright JS 1995. Tropical forest litter dynamics and dry season irrigation on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, Ecology 76(6), 1971– 1979.