Investigation of relationship between yield and yield components of wheat under drought stress using multivariate analysis

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2013
Views (808)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Investigation of relationship between yield and yield components of wheat under drought stress using multivariate analysis

Seied Mehdi Mirtaheri, Farzad Paknejad, Marieh Behdad, Mohammad Reza Tookalo
Int. J. Biosci. 3(6), 8-14, June 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

In order to evaluate effects of drought stress on yield and some relevant traits of bread wheat cultivars, current study was carried out in the research field of Islamic Azad University of Karaj during 2006-2007. The irrigation schemes scheduled as main plots included the following: (T1) 40% moisture depletion throughout the growing season (control); (T2) 60% moisture depletion throughout the growing season; (T3) 80% moisture depletion throughout the growing season; (T4) no irrigation at stem elongation and continuing with adequate irrigation to the end; (T5) no irrigation from stem elongation to the end of the growing season; (T6) no irrigation at flowering and continuing with adequate irrigation to the end; (T7) no irrigation from flowering to the end of the growing season; and (T8) no irrigation from milk stage to the end; and 2 wheat cultivars [Marvdasht (V1), Chamran (V2)] as sub-plots. The simple correlation results showed that seed yield has a positive, significant correlation with the biomass, Harvest index, Plant height, 1000 grain weight and Spike numbers per square meter. According to results of principal component analysis an increase in the number of components was associated with a decrease in eigenvalues and its maximum at three factors which all together accounted for 70.87% of the total variation of grain yield.

Asseng S, Turnera NC, Rayb JD, Keatingc BA. 2002. A simulation analysis that predicts the influence of physiological traits on the potential yield of wheat. European Journal of Agronomy 17, 123–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00149-6

Baloch MJ, Dunwell J, Dennet M, Ul-hassan Z, Rajpar I, Jatoi WA, Veesar NF. 2012. Evaluating spring wheat cultivars for drought tolerance through yield  and  physiological  parameters at booting and anthesis. African Journal of Biotechnology 11, 11559-11565. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897//AJB12.17001

Boyer JS. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218, 443–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.218.4571.443

Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck FW, Mazzucotelli E,  Mastrangelo  AM,  Francia  E, Marè  C, Tondelli A, Stanca AM. 2008. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research 105, 1-14.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.004

Everit BS, Dunn G. 1992. Applied multivariate data analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

Larcher W. 1995. Physiological Plant Ecology. 3th Edn., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Leilah AA, Al-Khateeb SA. 2005. Statistical analysis  of  wheat  yield  under  drought  conditions. Journal of Arid Environments 61, 483–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.10.011

Lev-Yadun S, Gopher A, Abbo S. 2000. The cradle of agriculture. Science 288, 1602–1603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5471.1602

Shahryari R, Gurbanov E, Gadimov A, Hassanpanah  D.  2008.  Tolerance  of  42  Bread wheat Genotypes to Drought stress after Anthesis. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 10, 1330-1335. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2008.1330.1335

Singh BN, Vishwakarma S R, Singh VK. 2010. Character association and path analysis in elite lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Archives 10, 845-847.

Tester M, Langridge P. 2010. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327, 818–822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1183700

Wong JH, Marx DB, Wilson JD, Buchanan BB, Lemaux PG, Pedersen JF. 2010. Principal component analysis and biochemical characterization of protein and starch reveal primary targets for improving sorghum grain. Plant Science 179, 598-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.08.020

Related Articles

Optimizing soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) performance through rhizobial inoculation and planting density in Kétou, Benin

Mahougnon Charlotte Carmelle Zoundji*, Ibouraïman Balogoun, Pascal Gbenou, Tobi Moriaque Akplo, Carlosse Djeho, Félix Kouélo Alladassi, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 99-107, June 2026.

Genetic admixture and the philosophy of diplomacy in central Asia: Evidence from intercultural dialogue, governance and genomic data

Shafee Ur Rehman, Waqar Ahmed Khan, Iqra Jamil, Muhammad Abdullah, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 89-98, June 2026.

Synthesizing and integrating environmental awareness and bio-intensive gardening under the Gulayan sa Paaralan (SIBUG) extension project

Violeta F. Collado*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, Marilyn D. Respicio, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 82-88, June 2026.

Diversity of insects related to maize (Zea mays) production in Ferkéssédougou region, Côte d’Ivoire

Fondio Drissa, Dao Hassane, Soro Lacina*, Sib Ollo, Kouadio Roger Hosphade Kouassi, Soro Senan, Yeboue N’guessan Lucie, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 75-81, June 2026.

Diuretic activity assessment of an aqueous extract of Zanthoxylum gilletii (Rutaceae) stem bark in rats

Akoua Jeanne Kanga*, Essoi Kouametchi Hermann, Françoise Assamala Fossou, Kacou Jules Marius Djetouan, Kouao Augustin Amonkan, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 68-74, June 2026.

Phytochemical investigation and in vitro evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Aglaonema hookerianum stems

K. M. Monirul Islam, Simin Shabnam Lopa, Joya Rani, Md. Aslam Sheikh, Md. Golam Sadik*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 60-67, June 2026.

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.