Investigation of traits correlations and path analysis of barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.) seed yield under terminal drought-stress conditions

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/11/2013
Views (266) Download (2)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Investigation of traits correlations and path analysis of barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.) seed yield under terminal drought-stress conditions

Zeinab Fatemi Rika, Farzad Paknejad, Ebrahim Amiri, Mohhamad Nabi Eilkaee, Seied Mehdi Mirtaheri
Int. J. Biosci.3( 11), 115-121, November 2013.
Certificate: IJB 2013 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

In order to evaluate most important traits affecting grain yield of ten barley genotypes under stress and non-stress conditions, a field experiment was conducted similarly in 2010-2011, at University research farm of Karaj Azad Islamic (35º 43´ N latitude, 50º 56´ E longitude, 1160 m altitude). The experiments were laid out in split plot using randomized complete block design with four replications. Main plots were in two levels; full irrigation and drought stress (terminal irrigation at ear appearance). Ten barley genotypes also used as sub plot treatments. There were significant correlation among grain yield, fertile tillers number, days to maturity, thousand grain weight, straw yield, biomass and harvest index also inoculated days to heading negatively in two conditions. Results of stepwise regression revealed that 4 traits: fertile tillers number, harvest index, Biomass and straw yield (in the irrigated condition) could explain almost 98 percent of grain yield trait variation. Results of path analysis showed that inoculated biomass had the most direct effect (1.73) on grain in stress condition. Based on obtained results it can be suggested these traits: fertile tillers number, biomass and straw yield in stress and non-stress conditions.

VIEWS 5

Abayomi Y, Wright D. 1999. Effects of water stress on growth and yield of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Tropical Agriculture 76, 120– 125.

Chmielewski F, Kohn W. 2000. Impact of weather on yield components of winter rye over 30 years. Agric. Forest Meteorology 102, 253–261.

Dofing SM. Knight CW. 1992. Alternative model for path analysis of small-grain yield. Crop Science 32, 487–489. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183×003 200020040X

Garcia del Moral LF, Rharrabti Y, Villegas D. Royo C. 2003.  Evaluation  of  grain  yield  and  its components in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions: an ontogenic approach. Agronomy Journal 95, 266–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.2660

Garcı´a del Moral LF, Ramos JM, Garcı´a del Moral B, Jimenez- Tejada MP. 1991. Ontogenetic approach to grain production in spring barley based on path-coefficient analysis. Crop Sci 31, 1179–1185. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003 100050021

Garcia del Moral LF, Rharrabti Y, Elhani S, Martos V, Royo, C. 2005. Yield formation in Mediterranean durum wheat under two contrasting water regimes based on path-coefficient analysis. Euphytica 143, 213-222.

Giunta F, Motzo R, Deidda M. 1993. Effect of drought on yield and yield components of durum wheat and triticale in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research 33, 399–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90161-F

Hamid   ZA,   Grafius   JE.   1978.   Developmental allometry and its implication to grain yield in barley. Crop Sci 18, 83–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183X001800010022x

Khaliq  I,  Parveen  N,  Chowdhry  MA.  2004. Correlation  and  path  coefficient  analyses  in  bread wheat. International journal of agriculture and biology 6, 633-635. http://dx.doi.org/1560-8530/2004/06-4.

Kashif M, Khaliq I. 2004. Heritability, correlation and path analysis for some metric traits in wheat. International journal of agriculture and biology 6, 138-142.

Khatiti M. 2012. Correlation between grain yield and its components in some Syrian barley. Journal of Applied Sciences research 8, 247-250.

Lorencetti C, de. Carvalho FIF, de. Oliveira AC, Valério IP, Hartwig I, Benin G,. Schmidt DAM. 2006. Applicability of phenotypic and canonic correlations and path coefficients in the selection of oat genotypes. Science Agriculture (Piracicaba, Braz.) 63, 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103901620060001000 03

Leilah A, Al-Khateeb SA. 2005. Statistical analysis of wheat yield under drought conditions. Journal of Arid Environments 61, 483-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv. 2004.10.011.

Maragues M, Garcia del moral LF, Moralejo M, Roya C. 2006. Yield formation strategies of durum wheat landraces with distinct pattern of dispersal with the Mediterranean basin I: Yield components. Field crop research 95, 194-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.02.009

Mollasadegh V, Imani A A, Shahryari R, Khayatnezhad M. 2011. Correlation and path analysis of morphological traits in different wheat genotypes under end drought stress condition. Middle-East journal of scientific research 7, 221-224.

Nessa D, Islam H, Mirza SH. Azimuddin M. 1998. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in barley (Hordeum vaulgare L). Bangladesh Journal of Botany 32, 181-185.

Rassmuson DC, Cannell RQ. 1970. Selection for grain yield and components of yield in barley. CropScience 10, 51–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183X001000010020x

Simane B, Struik PC, Nachit M, Peacock JM. 1993. Ontogenetic analysis of yield components and yield stability of durum wheat in water-limited environments. Euphytica 71, 211–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00040410

Singh N. 2012. Correlation in barley (Hurdeum Vulgar L.) on salt affected soil. Indian journal of fundamental and applied life sciences 2, 118-131.

Singh B, Vishwakarma N, Singh VK. 2010. Character association and path analysis in Elite lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Archives 10, 845-847.

Yagdi K. 2009. Path coefficient analysis of some yield components in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf). Pakistan Journal of Botany 41, 745-751.