Iranian Pimpinella L. (Apiaceae): A taxonomic revision

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2016
Views (948)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Iranian Pimpinella L. (Apiaceae): A taxonomic revision

Maryam Khajehpiri, Sogol Fereidounfar, Valiollah Mozaffarian, Farrokh Ghahremaninejad
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 8(1), 139-158, January 2016.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

In the family Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae, the genus Pimpinella L. with about 150 species is one of the largest genera. This widespread and taxonomically complex genus has 20 species distributed throughout Iran, of which, eight species are endemic. The resolution of relationships among these approximately 20 species remains largely obscure. In this study, Morphological analyses were conducted using NTSYS to assess relationships among Pimpinella species with emphasis on Iranian Pimpinella. Based on the most significant morphological characters, a dendrogram was sketched ending up giving the following results: In phenon line 0.54 and 0.56, two clusters are clearly distinct. In the first cluster three distinct branches could be observed: (1) annual species of genus Pimpinella L., although P. affinis shows similarity to them, (2) four species includes P. anisactis, P. khorasanica, P. khayyamii and P. tragium and (3) Reutera group (P. aurea, P. deverroides, P. tragioides, P. dichotoma and P. pastinacifolia). At 0.56 the second cluster separated P. kotschyana, P. oliverioides, P. olivieri and P. gedrosiaca from the second subcluster which includes P. peucedanifolia, P. rhodantha, and P. saxifraga. Morphologically speaking, these species exhibit blatant differences compared with others. In addition, the identification key is also provided to represent the similarities and relationships between the species. This study presents a complete description, general distribution and its distribution in Iran for each species as well as some distribution maps for all Iranian species.

Downie SR, Spalik K, Katz-Downie DS, Reduron JP. 2010. Major clades within Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae as inferred by phylogenetic analysis of nrDNA ITS sequences. Plant Diversity and Evolution 128 (1-2), 111-136.

Hedge IC, Lamond JM, Rechinger KH. 1988. Flora Iranica vol. 162: Umbeliferae. Akademische Druck-U. Verlogsanstalt. Graz- Austria.

Khajepiri M, Ghahremaninejad F, Mozaffarian V. 2010. Fruit anatomy of the genus Pimpinella L. (Apiaceae) in Iran. Flora- Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 205(5), 344-356.

Mozaffarian V. 2003. New species and new records of Iranian Umbelliferae. Bot. Jour. 88(4), 104-124.

Mozaffarian V. 2007. In: Assadi, M., Maassoumi, A.A., Khatamsaz, M. (Eds.). Flora of Iran 54. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. Tehran, Iran.

Pimenov MG, Leonov MV. 1993. The Genera of Umbelliferae: A nomenclator. Kew: Royal Botanic Garden.

Pimenov MG, Leonov MV. 2004. The Asian Umbelliferae Biodiversity Database (ASIUM) with particular reference to South-West Asian taxa. Turkish Journal of Botany 28, 139-145.

Rohlf FJ. 2000. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1. Exeter software. Setauket, New York, USA.

Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, California, USA.

Sokal RR, Michener CD. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 38, 1409-1438.

Tabanca N, Douglas AW, Bedir E, Dayan FE, Kirimer N, Baser KH, Aytac Z, Khan IA, Scheffler BE. 2005. Patterns of essential oil relationships in Pimpinella (Umbelliferae) based on phylogenetic relationships using nuclear and chloroplast sequences. Plant Genetic Resources 3(2), 149-169.

Zakharova EA, Degtjareva GV, Pimenov MG. 2012. Redefined generic limits of Carum (Umbelliferae, Apioideae) and new systematic placement of some of its taxa. Willdenowia-Annals of the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem 42(2), 149-168.

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.