Laboratory and field evaluation of oviposition color preference in mosquitoes

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/04/2018
Views (858)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Laboratory and field evaluation of oviposition color preference in mosquitoes

Arif Mehmood, Muhammad Naeem, Ata-ul-Mohsin, Muhammad Tariq, Sheraz Khan, Noushaba Nargis
Int. J. Biosci. 12(4), 336-340, April 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Survival of the offsprings is the top most priority of all the insects, including mosquitoes. To ensure it, mosquitoes usually oviposit at some particular sites. Characteristics of these sites are sensed by some cues, including chemical and visual cues. In the present study oviposition color preference of certain mosquito species was determined by placing different colored ovitraps in the laboratory as well as in the field. Eggs laid in those ovitraps were counted and reared till the emergence of adults in the Biosystematics laboratory of PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi. Black and red were the most preferred ovitraps, 17.66 and 13.33 eggs were deposited respectively, while blue was least preferred, 2.06 eggs were laid. Yellow and green were almost equally preferred after black and red ovitraps. The oviposition color preferences were found almost same in both laboratory and field conditions. These results of color preference are helpful in preparing ovitraps for mosquitoes, hence can be used as a tool in the management and control of mosquitoes.

Banafshi O, Abai M, Ladonni H, Bakhshi H, Karami H, Azari-HamidianS. 2013. The fauna and ecology of mosquito larvae (Diptera: Culicidae) in Western Iran. Turkish Journal of Zoology.37, 298–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1206-12.

Barrera R, Amador M, MacKay AJ. 2015. Population dynamics of Aedes aegypti and dengue as influenced by weather and human behavior in San Juan, Puerto Rico. PLoS  Diseases. 5(12),1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001378

Beehler J, Lohr S, DeFoliart G. 1992.Factors influencing oviposition in Aedes triseriatus Diptera: Culicidae. Great Lakes Entomologist 25(4), 259–264.

Blosser EM, Burkett-Cadena ND. 2017. Oviposition strategies of Florida Culex (Melanoconion) Mosquitoes. Journal of Medical Entomology.54(4), 812-820.

Farnesi LCHCM, Vargas, Valle D, Rezende G. L. 2017. Darker eggs of mosquitoes resist more to dry conditions: Melanin enhances serosal cuticle contribution in egg resistance to desiccation in Aedes, Anophlese, Culex vectors. PLoS Neglected Tropical Disease. 11(10), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006.063

Gjullin CM. 1947.  Effect of Clothing Color on the Rate of Attack of Aëdes Mosquitoes, Journal of Economic Entomology. 40(3), 326–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jee/40.3.326.

Jones CJ, Schreiber ET. 1994.Color and height affects oviposition site preferences of Toxorhynchites splendens and Toxorhynchites rutilus rutilus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory. Environmental Entomology.23(1),130–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ee/23.1.130

McDaniel IN, Dentley MD, Lee HP, Yatagai M. 1976.Effects of color and larval-produced oviposition attractants on oviposition of Aedes triseriatus. Environmental Entomology. 5(3), 553–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ee/5.3.553.

Mehmood A, Naeem M, BodlahI, Ata-ul-Mohsin. 2016. Systematics of Anopheles and Armigeres (Culicidae:Diptera) mosquitoes in the Pothwar Region, Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Mosquito  Research. 3(5), 5–10.

Panigrahi SK, Barik TK, Mohanty S, Tripathy NK. 2014. Laboratory evaluation of oviposition behavior of field collected Aedes mosquitoes. Journal of  Insects. 2014, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/207489.

Rey JR, O’Connell SM. 2014. Oviposition by Aedes Aegypti and Aedes Albopictus: influence of congeners and of oviposition site characteristics. Journal of Vector Ecology. 39(1), 190–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ee/5.3.553.

Williams R. 1962. Effect of color opposition media with regard to the mosquito Aedes triseriatus (Say).Journal of Parasitology.48, 919–925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ee/5.3.553.

Wilton DP.1968. Oviposition site selection by the tree-hole mosquito, Aedes triseriatus (Say). Journal of Medical Entomology. 5(2),189–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/5.2.189.

Related Articles

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous fungal antagonists from soils naturally suppressive to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4

Arnel V. Somolostro*, Carolina D. Amper, Mellprie B. Marin, Darwin M. Apistar, Myrna G. Ballentes, Ailyn Q. Daniel, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 27-36, June 2026.

Basal stem rot of oil palm in Africa: Emerging epidemiology, pathogen diversity and future management challenges

Emmanuel Fumbuka Mabula*, Agatha Aloyce, Alfonce Leonard, Pavithravani B. Venkataramana, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 13-26, June 2026.

The role of aberrant glycosylation in autoimmune disease development and progression

Md. Nafis Fuad Prottoy, Sayad Md. Didarul Alam*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 1-12, June 2026.

Solvents’ influence on polyphenolic compound extractions from Lippia multiflora leaves (Mold, 1949), and their antioxidant activity

Kelemin Awa Koné*, Tagouèlbè Tiho, Mariam Sanogo, Casimir Kekou, Kouassi Hervé Tani, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 109-116, May 2026.

Economics of selected cropping system practices in the province of La Union, Philippines

Jennifer A. Cabading, V. Sagun Analyn, Angelina T. Gonzales*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 97-108, May 2026.

The hidden burden: A review of toxicity from femoral orthopedic implants

Haroon Habib Beigh*, Nabeel Khan, Mirza Masroor Ali Beg, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 84-96, May 2026.