Laboratory and field evaluation of oviposition color preference in mosquitoes

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/04/2018
Views (841)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Laboratory and field evaluation of oviposition color preference in mosquitoes

Arif Mehmood, Muhammad Naeem, Ata-ul-Mohsin, Muhammad Tariq, Sheraz Khan, Noushaba Nargis
Int. J. Biosci. 12(4), 336-340, April 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Survival of the offsprings is the top most priority of all the insects, including mosquitoes. To ensure it, mosquitoes usually oviposit at some particular sites. Characteristics of these sites are sensed by some cues, including chemical and visual cues. In the present study oviposition color preference of certain mosquito species was determined by placing different colored ovitraps in the laboratory as well as in the field. Eggs laid in those ovitraps were counted and reared till the emergence of adults in the Biosystematics laboratory of PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi. Black and red were the most preferred ovitraps, 17.66 and 13.33 eggs were deposited respectively, while blue was least preferred, 2.06 eggs were laid. Yellow and green were almost equally preferred after black and red ovitraps. The oviposition color preferences were found almost same in both laboratory and field conditions. These results of color preference are helpful in preparing ovitraps for mosquitoes, hence can be used as a tool in the management and control of mosquitoes.

Banafshi O, Abai M, Ladonni H, Bakhshi H, Karami H, Azari-HamidianS. 2013. The fauna and ecology of mosquito larvae (Diptera: Culicidae) in Western Iran. Turkish Journal of Zoology.37, 298–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1206-12.

Barrera R, Amador M, MacKay AJ. 2015. Population dynamics of Aedes aegypti and dengue as influenced by weather and human behavior in San Juan, Puerto Rico. PLoS  Diseases. 5(12),1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001378

Beehler J, Lohr S, DeFoliart G. 1992.Factors influencing oviposition in Aedes triseriatus Diptera: Culicidae. Great Lakes Entomologist 25(4), 259–264.

Blosser EM, Burkett-Cadena ND. 2017. Oviposition strategies of Florida Culex (Melanoconion) Mosquitoes. Journal of Medical Entomology.54(4), 812-820.

Farnesi LCHCM, Vargas, Valle D, Rezende G. L. 2017. Darker eggs of mosquitoes resist more to dry conditions: Melanin enhances serosal cuticle contribution in egg resistance to desiccation in Aedes, Anophlese, Culex vectors. PLoS Neglected Tropical Disease. 11(10), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006.063

Gjullin CM. 1947.  Effect of Clothing Color on the Rate of Attack of Aëdes Mosquitoes, Journal of Economic Entomology. 40(3), 326–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jee/40.3.326.

Jones CJ, Schreiber ET. 1994.Color and height affects oviposition site preferences of Toxorhynchites splendens and Toxorhynchites rutilus rutilus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory. Environmental Entomology.23(1),130–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ee/23.1.130

McDaniel IN, Dentley MD, Lee HP, Yatagai M. 1976.Effects of color and larval-produced oviposition attractants on oviposition of Aedes triseriatus. Environmental Entomology. 5(3), 553–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ee/5.3.553.

Mehmood A, Naeem M, BodlahI, Ata-ul-Mohsin. 2016. Systematics of Anopheles and Armigeres (Culicidae:Diptera) mosquitoes in the Pothwar Region, Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Mosquito  Research. 3(5), 5–10.

Panigrahi SK, Barik TK, Mohanty S, Tripathy NK. 2014. Laboratory evaluation of oviposition behavior of field collected Aedes mosquitoes. Journal of  Insects. 2014, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/207489.

Rey JR, O’Connell SM. 2014. Oviposition by Aedes Aegypti and Aedes Albopictus: influence of congeners and of oviposition site characteristics. Journal of Vector Ecology. 39(1), 190–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ee/5.3.553.

Williams R. 1962. Effect of color opposition media with regard to the mosquito Aedes triseriatus (Say).Journal of Parasitology.48, 919–925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ee/5.3.553.

Wilton DP.1968. Oviposition site selection by the tree-hole mosquito, Aedes triseriatus (Say). Journal of Medical Entomology. 5(2),189–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/5.2.189.

Related Articles

Frequency of occurrence of pathogens of diseases observed in cucumber (Cucumis sativa L.) plants

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, A. Kh. Rajabli, A. G. Eyvazov, E. I. Allahverdiyev, S. F. Azadaliyeva, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 181-186, April 2026.

Apparent digestibility of nutrients in diets based on dried Okara (Solid residue from soy milk and cheese production) in growing rabbits in Benin

Atchadé Ghislaine Sègbédji Théodora*, Edénakpo Kocou Aimé, Yètomè Amour, Bonou Gbodja Gilbert, Houndonougbo Mankpondji Frédéric, Mensah Guy Apollinaire, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 155-163, April 2026.

Philippines dipterocarp research (2000-2025): Trends, gaps and future priorities

Jay Mark G. Cortado, Angelo L. Lozano*, Reymark P. Rivera, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 138-154, April 2026.

Anti-proliferative potential of seed derived proteins from Vitis vinifera and Mangifera indica

Hareeshthulasi, V. Vinotha, R. Rajakumar*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 129-137, April 2026.

Valorisation of table waste and fruit waste by black soldiers (Ullicens hermetica)

Ayaba Adéline Hounnou, Vanessa Chabi, Jomini Marc Sène Alitonou, Franck Sokenou, Mickael Vitus Martin Kpessou Saïzonou, Fidèle Paul Tchobo, Guy Alain Alitonou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 123-128, April 2026.

Murraya koenigii (Linn.) Spreng.: An opulent source of fatty acid

Shahin Aziz*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 116-122, April 2026.

Design and architecture of an IoT-enabled bamboo resource management system: Data-driven approach for sustainable agriculture

Charlot L. Maramag*, Dorothy M. Ayuyang, Richard R. Ayuyang, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 107-115, April 2026.