Land suitability analysis of the most preferred tree species in production forest areas

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2016
Views (310) Download (19)

Land suitability analysis of the most preferred tree species in production forest areas

Basir Achmad
J. Bio. Env. Sci.9( 4), 219-231, October 2016.
Certificate: JBES 2016 [Generate Certificate]


In supporting the People’s Plantations program of the Government of Indonesia, the species planted should be preferred by communities. In addition, the land characteristics where the species will be planted should match with growth requirements of the most preferred tree species. Based on the interview with the communities, the most preferred tree species was the rubber tree with some reasons: (1) the tree species provided cash income continuously for a long-term period (100%), (2) they were easy to sell (89%), (3) they were easy to plant and maintain (86%), and (4) the communities were familiar with the tree species (79%). But on the basis of land suitability analysis, the land system characteristics did not match with the growth requirements of the rubber tree species. The unsuitability of the land system unit characteristics to the rubber tree growth requirements were mostly caused by (1) temperature regime, (2) water availability, (3) rooting conditions, (4) nutrient availability, and (5) terrain. However, based on financial analysis, rubber tree species was viable to cultivate because with a community’s own labor system, the Internal Rate of Return was 47%, and with a hired labor system, the Internal Rate of Return was 29%. The two IRRs were greater than the social discount rate (12%). Therefore, the rubber tree species was suitable to plant for the People’s Plantations program. The land suitability analysis had successfully discovered and tried to solve the problems that hampered the rubber tree growth so that rubber tree plantations will be more productive and sustainable.


Brady NC, Weil RR. 2008. The nature and properties of soils. Fourteenth Edition. Pearson Education, Inc. New Jersey.

Brady NC. 1990. The nature of soils. Tenth edition. Cornell University and United States Agency for International Development. Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey.

Center for Soil Research/Food and Agriculture Organization (CSR/FAO) Staff. 1983. Reconnaissance land resources surveys 1:250.000 Scale. Atlas format procedures. Center for Soil Research, Indonesia Bogor.

Central Bureau of Statistics of Banjar District. 2010. Statistical yearbook of Banjar district. Banjar District Government Martapura.

Charman PEV, Murphy BW. 2007. Soils, their properties and management, Third edition. New South Wales State Government, Department of Natural Resources. Oxford University Express Victoria.

Department of Forestry of Republic of Indonesia. 1990. Forestry dictionary. Edition I (part II). Jakarta.

Djaenudin, Basuni, Nugroho K, Anda M, Sutrisno U. 1993. Technical guidance of land evaluation. Collaboration between Soil and Agro climate Research Center and National Agriculture Research Development Project. Research and Development Board of Agriculture, Agriculture Department of Indonesia. Jakarta.

Dove MR. 1993. Smallholder rubber and swidden agriculture in Borneo. A sustainable adaptation to the ecology and economy of the tropical forest. Economic Botany 47, 136-147. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx. New York.

Driessen PM, Konijn NT. 1992. Land-use system analysis. Interdisciplinary research (INRES). Cooperation between Brawijaya University, Wageningen Agricultural University, and State University Leyden. Malang, Indonesia.

Fahrizal Y. 2011. Cost and income analysis of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) farmers in Mantimin village, Batumandi subdistrict, Balangan district, South Kalimantan province. Thesis, Faculty of Forestry, Lambung Mangkurat University. Banjarbaru.

Foth HD. 1990. Fundamentals of soil science. Eighth edition. Michigan State University. John Wiley & Sons. New York.

Goliath Business News. 2008. Profile of rubber plantations in Indonesia. Indonesian Commercial News. The Gale Group.

Kadariah, Karlina L, Gray C. 1978. Introduction to project evaluation. National Planning Program, Economic and Community Research Institute of Indonesia University, Faculty of Economics of Indonesia University. Jakarta.

Mantel S, Wosten H, Verhagen J. 2007. Biophysical land suitability for oil palm in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Report 2007/0. ISRIC-m World Soil Information, Alterra, Plant Research International, Wageningen UR. Wageningen.

McKinley CR. 1997. Growing christmas trees in North Carolina. North Carolina Extension Service, North Carolina State University. Raleigh, North Carolina.

Ministry of Forestry of Indonesia. 2010. Collection of regulations regarding people’s plantations. Direct-orate of Forest Plantation Development, Direct-orate General of Production Forest. Jakarta.

Nawir AA, Murniati, Lukas R. 2007. Forest rehabilitation in Indonesia. Center for Forestry Rese-arch (CIFOR). Jakarta.

Nazaruddin, Paimin FB. 1992. Rubber, cultivation and processing, market strategy. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.

Poniman A, Nurwadjedi, Tobing L. 2004. Developing the national land resource database for supporting spatial land use planning. The third FIG conference, Bakosurtanal. Jakarta.

RafiI A. 2004. The effect of the difference of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg) ages on latex production in PTPN XIII Tambarangan, Tapin subdistrict, South Kalimantan. Thesis, Faculty of Forestry, Lambung Mangkurat University. Banjarbaru.

Regional Physical Planning Programme for Transmigration (RePPProT). 1990. The land resources of Indonesia: a national overview: based on regional reviews of the land resources of East with South Kalimantan (1987 [main report]. National Coordination Agency for surveys and mapping (Bakosurtanal), Directorate of Development Program, Directorate General of Settlement Preparation, Transmigration Department. Jakarta.

Siswomartono D. 1989. Encyclopedia of natural resources conservation. Erlangga. Jakarta.

Sitorus SRP. 1985. Land resource evaluation. Tarsito Bandung. Bandung.

Suyanto, Nor H, Nugroho Y. 2007. The inventory of multi-purposed superior local tree species based on ecological condition for rehabilitating critical lands in Banjar district. Faculty of Forestry/Forest Management, Lambung Mangkurat University. Banjarbaru.

Van Noordwijk M, Suyanto S, Budidarsono S, Sakuntaladewi N, Roshetko JM, Tata HL, Galudra G, Fay C. 2007. Is hutan tanaman rakyat a new paradigm in community based tree planting in Indonesia? ICRAF working paper number 45. ICRAF Southeast Asia Bogor.

Warner K. 1994. Selecting tree species on the basis of community needs. Community forestry field manual 5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome.