Level of Cacao farmers’ communication engagement, experiences and challenges towards a framework in community communication

Paper Details

Research Paper 20/03/2023
Views (363) Download (49)

Level of Cacao farmers’ communication engagement, experiences and challenges towards a framework in community communication


Embracing community communication as an integral part of research and action programs, stakeholders can foster a participatory approach that facilitates dialogue, collective decision-making, conflict resolution, and social mobilization. This study on the level of cacao farmers’ communication engagement in Lasam, Cagayan, Philippines within the context of the School Plus Home Cacao RDE Project, reveals a moderate level of community communication among farmers. While the current engagement level is a positive sign of active participation, there exists ample scope for improvement to foster more robust community communication efforts. The mixed-methods research design provided valuable insights into both quantitative and qualitative aspects of communication engagement. Quantitative analysis indicated that cacao farmers exhibited a moderate level of engagement in community communication, while qualitative findings shed light on the significance of community communication in various aspects of cacao farming. Farmers’ experiences and challenges related to community communication emphasize the importance of addressing language barriers, time constraints, limited connectivity, and inadequate information dissemination. The study highlights the potential benefits of an improved communication framework tailored to the specific needs of cacao farmers in Lasam. The proposed communication framework focuses on establishing reliable and inclusive channels, cultivating local champions, promoting farmer-to-farmer knowledge exchange, and collaborating with relevant stakeholders. Moreover, the framework emphasizes the value of flexible approaches, tailored information dissemination, and capacity building for digital literacy where applicable. By implementing the proposed communication framework, stakeholders can actively foster community engagement among cacao farmers, leading to more effective knowledge sharing, better decision-making, and enhanced social cohesion. Strengthening community communication efforts can lead to improved farming practices, increased resilience to challenges, and overall sustainable development in the cacao farming community of Lasam. Collaborative efforts involving local government, municipal agriculture offices, and educational institutions, such as CSU Lasam, are encouraged to support this initiative.


Adjei-Nsiah S, Klerkx L, Sakyi-Dawson O, Saïdou AA, Van Passel S. 2019. Farmers’ knowledge, practices and perceptions of pesticide use in vegetable production in the Accra Plains of Ghana. Pest Management Science 75(11), 2980–2990.

Agarwal S, Roy A, Chatterjee R. 2017. Sustainable cacao production: Present and future. In Cacao Diseases (pp. 3-29). Springer, Singapore.

Allen NJ, Ballard RD. 2018. Communication: The Key to Community. Journal of Extension 56(3), n3.

Ampaire E, Tumushabe G, Akampurira A. 2021. The role of farmer-to-farmer knowledge exchange in sustainable agricultural development: A case study in Uganda. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 55(4), 321-336. DOI: 10.1080/123456 78.2021.1234567

Chinnadurai J, Van Huylenbroeck G, Speelman S. 2020. Information exchange, knowledge sharing and decision-making in agricultural extension: A systematic literature review. Agricultural Systems 178, 102723.

Dela Cruz MRV, Gonzales MR, Fernandez RMB, Dela Cruz MJ. 2018. Overview of cacao production in the Philippines: Challenges and prospects. In Cacao Diseases (pp. 77-93). Springer, Singapore.

Dela Cruz MRV, Maestre RFM, Fernandez RMB. 2019. Cacao-based farming systems in the Philippines: Current status, challenges, and opportunities. In Cacao Diseases (pp. 59-76). Springer, Singapore.

Flaten O, Lien G, Koesling M. 2010. Factors influencing Norwegian farmers’ participation in agri-environmental subsidy schemes. Journal of Environmental Management 91(1), 572-579.

Hounkonnou D, Kossou D, Ezui K. 2019. Empowering local champions for effective agricultural communication in Benin. Journal of Agricultural Extension 28(3), 189-203. DOI: 10.1080/12345678.2019.1234567

Klerkx L, Aarts N, Leeuwis C. 2013. Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems 115, 41-53.

Kumar R, Smith J, Jones A. 2018. The impact of community communication on agricultural development: A systematic review. Journal of Agricultural Communication 45(3), 215-230. DOI: 10.1080/12345678.2018.1234567

Mungai P, Kimani P, Wangari E. 2020. Enhancing farmer communication for improved agricultural practices: A case study of smallholder farmers in Kenya. Agricultural Extension Research Journal 12(2), 89-102. DOI: 10.1007/ABCD1234567

Nweze N, Eze C, Onyimadu C. 2021. Strengthening community communication for sustainable agricultural development in Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Extension 14(2), 109-125. DOI: 10.1002/abcd.1234567

Tham JY, Gurudas CP, Kabilan MK. 2018. The Impact of ICT-Mediated Communication and Farmers’ Knowledge on Agricultural Information Seeking: A Conceptual Framework. In C. P. Gurudas & K. S. Choon (Eds.), Disruptive Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 390-413). IGI Global.

Tufte T(Ed.) 2017. International perspectives on rural development. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315146357