Locating QTLs controlling genotypic stability in Rye using AMMI model and AMMI based stability statistics

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2014
Views (129) Download (4)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Locating QTLs controlling genotypic stability in Rye using AMMI model and AMMI based stability statistics

Fartemah Rozgard, Ezatollah Farshadfar
J. Bio. Env. Sci.4( 5), 85-93, May 2014.
Certificate: JBES 2014 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

To locate QTLs controlling yield and yield stability in Rye, 7 disomic addition lines of Secale cereale into the genetic background of Chinese Spring (CS= recipient) were used in a completely randomized block design with three replications for 3 rainfed and irrigated conditions. The results of combined analysis of variance showed highly significant differences for environments, genotypes and genotype × environment interaction. The first multiplicative axis term explained 94.30% of GEI sum of squares. The average grain yield of the genotypes ranged from 0.72g for addition line 6 to 6.54g in addition line 2 indicating that QTLs controlling grain yield in Rye are located on chromosome 2R. Biplot analysis revealed that QTLs monitoring simultaneously yield and yield stability in Rye are distributed on chromosomes 2R, 5R and 7R. According to the all AMMI based stability measures and mean grain yield genotype 2R was identified with high grain yield with stability followed by 5R, therefore most of the QTLs controlling yield and yield stability are located on chromosome 2R of Rye. AMMI based stability statistics were positively correlated, therefore all of the AMMI based measures discriminate stable entries at the same manner.

VIEWS 3

Aniol A. 2004. Chromosomal location of aluminium tolerance genes in rye. Plant Breeding 123, 132-136.

Annicchiarico P. 1997. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of genotype location interaction in variety trials repeated over years.

Becker HC, Leon J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101, 1-23.

Becker HC, Leon J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101, 1-23.

Crossa J. 1990. Statistical analysis of multilocation trials. Advances in Agronomy 44, 55-85.

Dehghani H, Sabaghpour SH, Ebadi A. 2010. Study of genotype× environment interaction for chickpea yield in Iran. Agronomy Journal 102(1), 1-8.

Driscoll C, Sears ER. 1971. Individual addition of the chromosomes of ‘Imperial’ rye to wheat. Agronomy Abstracts. p: 6.

Eberhart SA, Russell WA. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science 6, 36-40.

Eskridge KM, Shah MM, Baenziger PS, Travnicek DA. 2000. Correcting for classification errors when estimating the number of genes using recombinant inbred chromosome lines. Crop Science 40, 398-403.

Fan XM, Kang MS, Chen H, Zhang Y, Tan J, Xu C. 2007. Yield stability of maize hybrids evaluated in multi-environment trials in Yunnan, China Agronomy Journal 99,

Farshadfar E, Farshadfar M, Kiani M. 2011. Involvement of chromosome 5R carrying the genes controlling yield and yield stability in Rye (Secale Cereale Cv. Imperial), European Journal of Scientific Research 59(3), 352-360.

Farshadfar E, Haghparast H, Qaitoli M. 2008. Chromosomal localization of the genes controlling agronomic and physiological indicators of drought tolerance in barley using disomic addition lines. Asian Journal of Plant Science 7(6), 536-543.

Farshadfar E, Sutka J. 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype – environment interaction in durum wheat using the AMMI model. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 54, 459-467.

Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding program. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742-754.

Freeman GH. 1990. Modern statistical methods for analyzing genotype–environment interactions. In: M.S. Kang (ed.), Genotype × Environment Interaction and Plant Breeding, pp. 118—125. Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA.

Gabriel KR. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58, 453-467.

Gauch HG. 1988. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44, 705-715.

Gauch HG. 1992. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials. AMMI Analysis of Factorial Designs. Elsevier, New York.

Gollob HF. 1968. A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika 33, 73-115.

Islam AKMR, Shepherd KW. 1990. Incorporation of barley chromosomes in wheat, pp. l28-151. In: Bajaj Y.P.S. (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol 13. Springer-Verlage publishers, Berlin, Germany.

Jalata Z, Ayana A, Zeleke H. 2011. Variability, heritability and genetic advance for

Jianzhong L, Yujing L, Yiping T, Jianwei G, Bin L, Jiyun L, Zhensheng L. 2001. Chromosomal location of genes conferring the tolerance to Pi starvation stress and acid phosphatase (APase) secretion in the genome of rye (Secale L.). Plant and Soil 237, 267–274.

Jin W, Melo JR, Nagakik, Talbert PB, Henikoff S, Dawe RK, Jiang J. 2004. Maize centromeres: organization and functional adaptation in the genetic background of oat. Plant Cell 16, 571-581.

Khodadadi  M,  Fotokian  MH,  Miransari  M. 2011. Genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes based on cluster and principal component analyses for breeding strategies. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5(1), 17- 24

Li ZS, Hao S. 1990. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium of Plant Chromosome Engineering p:1-6.

Li ZS. 1985. Wheat Wild Hybridization. Science Press, Beijing, China.

Lin CS, Binns MR. 1991. Genetic properties of four stability parameters. Theoretical Applied Genetetics 82, 505- 509.

Lin CS, Binns MR. 1994. Concepts and methods for analyzing regional trial data for cultivar and location selection. Plant Breed Review 12, 271–297.

Muehlbauer GJ, Riera-Lizarazu O, Kynast RG, Martin D, Phillips RL, Rines HW. 2000. A maize chromosome 3 addition line of oat exhibits expression of the maize homeobox gene liguleless 3 and alteration of cell fates. Genome 43, 1055-1064

Osiru MO, Olanya OM, Adipala E, Kapinga R, Lemaga B. 2009. Yield stability analysis of Ipomoea batatus L. cultivars in diverse environments. Australian Journal of Crop Science 3(4), 213-220.

Purchase JL,  Hatting H,  Van  Deventer CS. 2000. Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant Soil 17, 101-107.

Romagosa I, Fox PN. 1993. Genotype × environment interaction and adaptation. In: Hayward, M.D., Bosemark, N.O., Romagosa, I. (Eds.), Plant Breeding: Principles and Prospects. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 373-390.

Roy D. 2000. Plant breeding (analysis and exploitation of variation). Alpha science international ltd, U.K.

Rubio J, Flores F, Moreno MT, Cubero JI, Gil J. 2004. Effects of the erect/bushy habit, single/double pod and late/early flowering genes on yield and seed size and their stability in chickpea. Field Crops Research 90, 255–262.

Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. 1989. Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames.,USA.

Sneller CH, Kilgore-Norquest L, Dombek D. 1997. Repeatability of yield stability statistics in soybean. Crop science 37(2), 383-390. some yield and yield related traits in Ethiopian Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) land races and crosses. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics 5(1), 44-52.

Szakacs E, Molnar-Lang M. 2010. Molecular cytogenetic evaluation of chromosome instability in Triticum aestivumSecale cereale disomic addition lines. Journal of Applied Genetics 51(2), 149-152. Theoretical Appllied Genetics 94, 1072-1077.

Voltas FA, Sombrero A, Lafarga A, Igartua E, Romagosa I. 1999. Integrating statistical and ecophysiological analyses of genotype by environment interaction for grain filling ofbarley I. Field Crops Res 62, 63–74.

Wright AJ. 1971. The analysis and prediction of some two factor interactions in grass breeding. Journal of Agricultural Science 76, 301–306.

Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z .2000. Cultivar evaluation and megaenvironment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science 40, 597-605.

Yan W, Kang MS. 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists and Agronomists. 1st Edn., CRC Press LLC., Boca Roton, Florida, 271.

Zobel RW, Wright MJ, Gauch HG. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80, 388-393.