Longitudinal distribution of the functional feeding groups (FFGs) of aquatic macroinvertebrates and ecosystem integrity of Tokwe River, Zimbabwe
Paper Details
Longitudinal distribution of the functional feeding groups (FFGs) of aquatic macroinvertebrates and ecosystem integrity of Tokwe River, Zimbabwe
Abstract
Knowledge of functional feeding groups (FFGs) is key in understanding energy flow and matter transfer in lotic systems. The River Continuum Concept (RCC) model attempts to capture this flow by looking at the distribution of FFGs. The FFGs approach is informative because it allows assessment of the degree to which invertebrates in streams are dependent upon particular nutritional resource/s. We assessed the ecosystem integrity of Tokwe River, Zimbabwe, and whether it conforms to the RCC by analyzing macroinvertebrates from three zones along the river. A total of 2 172 specimens belonging to five feeding groups (FFGs) were collected. Filters were the dominant group in all zones with proportions of 37.7%, 53.1%, and 53.2% in the upstream, inundated and downstream zones, respectively. Predators (33.9% upstream) and collector-gatherers (25.9% inundated, 32.9% downstream) were second in frequency. Shredders were the least represented in all zones (< 3.1%). The highest proportion of filters (53.1%) and shredders (3.1%) occurred in inundated zones. Predator population was generally but insignificantly correlated to prey (p > 0.05). Scraper’s contribution was significantly lower in the inundated than in other environments (p < 0.05). All zones were strongly heterotrophic, non-performing and overburdened with predators although channel stability was high, hence high proportion of filters. The study showed that the distribution of FFG was not in conformity to the RCC but had tenants of Hierarchical Patch Distribution model which was modified by elements of the Flood Pulse model, and that ecosystem integrity and health are highly compromised by anthropogenic activities.
Acquah-Lamptey D, Kyerematen R, Owusu O. 2013. Using odonates as markers of the environmental health of water and its land related ecotone. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 5(11), 761-769.
Allan JD, Castillo MM. 2007. Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Arimoro FO. 2007. Macroinvertebrates functional feeding groups in River Orogodo, a second order stream in southern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Science and Environment 6,45 p.
Baptista DF, Buss DF, Nessimian JL, Da Silva ER, De MoraesNeto AHA, Carvalho SN, De Oliveira MA, Andrade LR.2006. Functional feeding groups of Brazilian Ephemeroptera nymphs ultra structure of mouthparts. Annual Limnology International Journal of Limnology42, 87–96.
Barman B, Gupta S. 2015.Spatial distribution and functional feeding groups of aquatic insects in a stream of Chakrashila Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems.416, 37.
Barber-Tames HM, Lugo-Ortiz CR, Samways MJ, Wilnot BC, Steven DM, Picker MD. 2003. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa Vol. 7. Insecta 1.WRC Report No.TT 201/02.Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
Benke AC, Wallace JB. 1997. Trophic basis of production among riverine caddisflies: implications for food web analysis. Ecology, 78, 1132-1145.
Boyero L, Pearson R G, Dudgeon D, Graça MAS, Gessner MO, Albariño RJ, Ferreira V, Yule C M, Boulton AJ, Arunachalam M, Callisto M, Chauvet E, Ramírez A, Chará, J, Moretti M S., Gonçalves JF, Helson JE, Chara-Serna AM, Encalada AC, Davies J N, Lamothe S, Cornejo A, Castela J, Li AOY, Buria LM, Villanueva VD, Zuniga MC, Pringle CM.2011. Global distribution of a key trophic guild contrasts with common latitudinal diversity patterns. Ecology 92, 1839–1848.
BrasilS, Juen L, Batista JD, Pavan MG, Cabette HSR. 2014. Longitudinal Distribution of the Functional Feeding Groups of Aquatic Insects in Streams of the Brazilian Cerrado Savanna Neotropical Entomology: 43, 421–428.
Bullivant J.1968. The method of feeding of lophophorates (Bryozoa, Phoronida, Brachiopoda) N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2, 135–46.
Camacho RL, Boyero A, Cornejo A, Ibáñez, and Pearson RG. 2009. Local variation in shredder numbers can explain their oversight in tropical streams. Biotropica4, 625–632.
Cambell IC.1985. Dietary habits of Australian siphlonurid and oligoneuriidemphemeropteran nymphs. Limnolgia, 22, 3250 -3259.
Chakona A. 2012. The Macroinvertebrate Communities of Two Upland Streams In Eastern Zimbabwe With Reference To The Impact Of Forestry.African journal of aquatic science 36(3), 289-297.
Cummins KW, Merritt RW, Andrade PCN.2005. The use of invertebrate functional groups to characterize ecosystem attributes in selected streams and rivers in southeast Brazil. Stud Neotropical Fauna Environ 40, 71–90.
Day JA Griffiths DH, Stewart BA, Bhart K, Bickerion R.2001. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of Southern Africa Vol. 4 Crustacaea III. Water Research Commission Report No.TT 201/02. Water Research Commission,Pretoria, South Africa.
Day JA, Harrison AD, de Moor IJ. 2002a. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa. Volume 9: Diptera. Water Research Commission Report No.TT 201/02.Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
Day JA, and de Moor IJ. 2002b. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa. Volume 6,Arachnida and Mollusca (Araneae, Water Mites and Mollusca).WRC Report No.TT 182/02.Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
Day JA, Heag J, Rayner NA, Appleton CC., Millard, NAH, Brain, CK, Heyns J, vanHoven W, Oosthuizen JH, Sidalli ME.2002c. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of Southern Africa Vol.5: Non arthopods. Water Research Commission Report No.TT 201/02. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
De Moor I J, Day JA, de Moor FC.2003a. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa. Volume 7:Insecta I: Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Plecoptera. Water Research Commission Report No. TT 207/03. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa Shredders are not scarce. Freshwater Biology 50, 748-769.
De Moor IJ, Day JA, de Moor FC. 2003b. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa. Volume 8, Insecta II: Hemiptera, Megaloptera, Neuroptera, Trichoptera and Lepidoptera. WRC Report No.TT 214/03.Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
Dobson M, Magana A, Mathooko JM, Ndegwa FK.2002. Detritivores in Kenyan highland streams: more evidence for the paucity of shredders in the tropics? Freshwater Biology 47, 909-919.
Domínguez E, Fernández HR.2009. Benthic macroinvertebrates of South America. Tucumán: Fundación Miguel Lillo.
Ferreira V, Encalada AC, Graça MAS.2012. Effects of litter diversity on decomposition and biological colonization of submerged litter in temperate and tropical streams. Freshwater Science: 31, 945–962.
Gamboa M, Chacón MM, Segnini S.2009. Diet composition of the mature larvae of four Anacroneuria species (Plecoptera: Perlidae) from the Venezuelan Andes. Aquatic Insects 31, 409–417.
Gooderham J, Tsyrlin E,2002. The Waterbug Book: A Guide to the Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Temperate Australia. CSIRO Publishing, 240 p.
Hofmann TA, Mason CF.2005. Habitat characteristics and the distribution of Odonata in a lowland river catchment in eastern England. Hydrobiologia539(1), 137-147.
Irons JG, Oswood MW, Stout RJ, Pringle CM.1994. Latitudinal patterns in leaf breakdown: is temperature really important? Freshwater Biology3, 401-411.
Junk WJ. 1989. Flood tolerance and tree distribution in central Amazonia. Academic Press, London.
Junk WJ, Wantzen KM.2006. The flood pulse concept: new aspects, approaches and applications—an update. In: Welcomme RL, Petr T. (eds) Proceedings of Second International Symposium on the management of large rivers for fisher. RAP Publication, Kingdom, 117–149 p.
Kippings J. 2010. The dragonflies and damselflies of Botswana – annotated checklist with notes on distribution, phenology, habitats and Red list status of species (Insecta: Odonata). Mauritiana21, 126 – 173.
Koneri R, Nangoy MJ, Saroyo TET. 2017. Diversity and community composition of dragonfly (Insecta: Odonata) in Tangkoko Nature Reserve North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Bioscience Research: 14 (1), 01–08.
Mansell MW, Reavell PA, de Moor FC, Day JA, de Moor FC, Scott KMF. 2003. Guides the Freswater invertebrates of southern Africa Volume 8, Insecta II. Water Research Commission Report No.TT 201/02. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
Masese FO, Kitaka N, Kipkemboi J, Gette GM, Irvine1 K, McClain ME.2014. Macroinvertebrate functional feeding groups in Kenyan highland streams: evidence for a diverse shredder guild. Nigerian Journal of aquatic ecology. 5, 67-98.
Martens K, Rayner N, Van As J, van As IL.2001. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of Souther Africa Vol3. Crustacea II.WRC Report No.TT 201/02. Water Research Commission,Pretoria, South Africa.
Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB, Novak JA, Higgins MJ, Wessell KJ, Lessard JL. 2002. Development and application of a macroinvertebrate functional-group approachto the bioassessment of remnant river oxbows in southwest Florida. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21, 290–310.
Merritt RW, Cummins KW.1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America 3rd Edn. Kendall-Hunt, Dubuque, IOWA 862 p.
Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB. 2008. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Duduque, IA, USA.
Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB. 2017. Trophic Relationships of Macro invertebratesMethods in Stream Ecology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416558-8.00020-2
Mishra AS, Nautiyal P. 2013. Functional composition of benthic macroinvertebrate fauna in the Plateau Rivers, Bundelkhand, central India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5(13), 4752–4758.
Minaya V, McClain M, EMoog O, Omengo F, Singer GA. 2013. Scale-dependent effects of rural activities on benthic macroinvertebrates and physico-chemical characteristicsin headwater streams of the Mara River, Kenya. Ecological Indicators 32,116–122.
Minshall GW, Petersen RC, Cummins KW, Bott TL, Sedell JR, Cushing CE, Vannote RL, 1983. Interbiome comparison of stream ecosystem dynamics. Ecological Monographs 53, 1e25.
Mugandani R, Wuta M, Aakarau A, Chipindu B. 2012. Re-classification of agro-ecological regions of Zimbabwe in conformity with climate variability and change African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 20, Issue Supplement s2,361–369.
Nesemann H, Sharma G, Sinha RK.2011. Benthic macro-invertebrate fauna and “marine elements” Sensu annandale (1922) highlight the valuable dolphin habitat of River Ganga in Bihar – India. Taprobanica3(1),18-30.
Palmer C, O’Keeffe J, Palmer A, Dunne T, Radloff S. 1993. Macroinvertebrate functional feeding groups in the middle and lower reaches the Buffalo River, Eastern Cape, South Africa. I. Dietary variability. Freshwater Biology 29, 441–453.
Parker LM, Ross PM, O’Connor WA, Pörtner HO, Scanes E, Wright JM. 2013. Predicting the Response of Molluscs to the Impact of Ocean Acidification. Biology (Basel).2, 651–692.
Petts GE, Gurnell AM, Gerrard AJ. 2000. Longitudinal variations in exposed riverine sediments:a context for the ecology of the Fiume Tagliamento, Italy. Aquatic Conservation. 10, 249–266.
Pratt MC. 2008. Living where the flow is right: How flow affects feeding in bryozoans. Integrative and Comparative Biology, Volume 48(6),808–822.
Schlosser IJ. 1982. Fish Community Structure and Function along Two Habitat Gradients in a Headwater Stream Ecological Monographs. 52(4),395-414.
Sedel JR, Richey JE, Swanson FJ. 1989. The river continuum concept: a basis for the expected behavior of very large rivers? Canadian Spec Pubis Fish Aquatic. Science47, 1893–1907.
Suhling F, Martens A. 2007. Dragonflies and Damselflies of Namibia. Gamsberg macmillan Publishers, Windhoek, Namibia.
Stals R, de Moor IJ.2007. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa, Volume 10: Coleoptera. Water Research Commission Report No.TT 320/07.Water Research Commission, Pretoria,South Africa.
Statzner B, Higler B. 1985. PERSPECTIVES: Questions and Comments on the River Continuum Concept. Canadian Journal of Fish Aquatic Science. 42, 1038-1044.
Ta Fang WTI.2010. River-continuum and flood-pulse: exploring ecological and hydrologic concepts in riparian-wetland. Natl Taiwan Mus Special Publication14,101–111.
Tockner K, Ward JV, Malard F. 2000. An extension of the food pulse concept. Hydrology Processes14, 2862–2883.
Uwadiae RF.2010. Macroinvertebrates functional feeding groups as indices of biologicalassessment in a tropical aquatic ecosystem: implications for ecosystem functions. New York Science Journal 3, 8.
VannoteRL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. The River Continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fish and Aquatic Sciences. 37, 130-137.
Wantzen KM, Wagner R. 2006. Detritus processing by invertebrate shredders. A neotropical temperate comparison. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25, 216–232.
Zar JH.2010. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA) 1995.
Caston Makaka, Tinashe Muteveri, Paul Makoni, Crispen Phiri, Trevor Dube (2018), Longitudinal distribution of the functional feeding groups (FFGs) of aquatic macroinvertebrates and ecosystem integrity of Tokwe River, Zimbabwe; JBES, V13, N1, July, P17-34
https://innspub.net/longitudinal-distribution-of-the-functional-feeding-groups-ffgs-of-aquatic-macroinvertebrates-and-ecosystem-integrity-of-tokwe-river-zimbabwe/
Copyright © 2018
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0