Management of Weeds by using crop competition in mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2020
Views (1247)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Management of Weeds by using crop competition in mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Muzamil Hussain, Muhammad Adnan, Muhammad Asif, Ahsan Aziz, Amjed Ali, Muhammad Awais Bashir Khan, Muhammad Sikander Hayyat, Tauseef Iqbal, Hafiz Muhammad Bilal, Hafiz Abd-Ur-Rahman, Muhammad Danish Toor, Rehan Ahmad
Int. J. Biosci. 17(6), 62-69, December 2020.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2020; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) is the main crop among the oilseed crops of the world. Weeds are the main factors, responsible for the low production. Field research was planned and conducted during the winter season of 2016-17 at the College of Agriculture, the University of Sargodha to evaluate the impact of various row spacing on yield and its components under various weed competition durations. Maximum weed dry weight (79.1g m-2) was found at weedy condition till harvest while lowest (9.1 g m-2) in weed-free conditions till 70 DAS excluding the weed-free conditions. A higher number of branches plant-1 (7.8), no. of plants (137), 1000-seed weight (3.3 g), seed yield (1536 kg ha-1) was in narrow 15 cm row spacing over the wider row spacing. About 42.64% yield reduction was recorded in weedy conditions till harvesting over weed-free conditions up to harvesting while 9.34% yield reduction was recorded when row spacing was increased from 15 cm to 20 cm while a 10.27% yield decline observed when row spacing increased from 20 cm to 25 cm. The critical period for weed control is 38DAS. The interaction was also significant. Maximum seed yield (1965.7 kgha-1) was found at 15 cm row spacing with weed-free conditions till harvesting followed by (890 kg ha-1) at 25 cm row spacing with weedy conditions till harvesting of the crop. It is concluded that as the row spacing of the crop increases from narrower to wider, the weed dry matter increases and seed yield decreases.

Alam MM. 2004. Effect of variety and row spacing on the yield and yield contributing characters of rapeseed and mustard, (M.Sc., Thesis), Department of Agronomy, Bangladesh Agriculture University Mymensingh.

Ali Y, Ahsanul H, Tahir MGR, Ahmad N. 1999. Effect of inter and intra-row spacing on the yield and yield components of chickpea. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 2, 305-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.1999.305.307

Bhan VM, Mishra JS. 1993. Improving crop productivity through weed management Pesticide information. Indian Journal of Agronomy 19(3), 25-26.

Chauhan YS, Bhargava MK, Jain VK. 2005. Weed management in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L). Indian Journal of Agronomy 50(2), 149-151.

Christensen JV, Drabble JC. 1984. Effect of row spacing and seeding rate on rapeseed yield in Northwest Alberta. Canadian Journal of plant science 64(4), 1011-1013. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps84-137

Diepenbrock W. 2000. Yield analysis of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review.  Field Crops Research 67, 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00082-4

Downey RK. 1990. Brassica oilseed: breeding achievements and opportunities. Plant Breeding Abstract 60, 1165- 1169.

Hasanuzzaman M, Karim MF. 2007. Performance of Rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.) cv. SAU sarisha under different row spacing and irrigation levels. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 3, 960-965.

Khaliq I, Hof C, Prinzinger R, Bohning-Gaese K, Pfenninger M. 2014. Global variation in thermal tolerances and vulnerability of endotherms to climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281, 20141097. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1097

Knezevic SZ, Evans SP, Blankenship EE, Van-Acker RC, Lindquist JL. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Science 50, 773-786. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00062.1

Mankar DD. 2016. Study on effective weed management in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Journal of Oilseed Brassica 1, 279-288.

Mekki BB, Sharara FAA, El-Rokiek KG. 2010. Effect of weed control treatments on yield and seed quality of some canola cultivars and associated weeds in newly reclaimed sandy soils. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science 7(2), 202-209.

Morrison MJ, Mc-Vetty PBE, Scarth R. 1990a. Effect of row spacing and seeding rates on summer rape in southern Manitoba, Canadian Journal of Plant Science 70, 127-137. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps90-015

Rahman MM, Alam MN, Alam MM, Sarma PK. 2010. Performance of Rapeseed under Variable Row Spacing and Nitrogen Levels. Bangladesh Journal of Agriculturist 3(1), 53-57.

Shaheenuzzamn M, Ahmad I, Karim M, Haider S, Raquibullah S, Ahmad M. 2010. Herbicidal control of weed in mustard field. A Journal of Multidisciplinary Advanced Research 1, 15-19.

Singh I, Sharma AK, Singh I. 1992. Evaluation of effective weed control system in mustard under west Rajasthan conditions. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 13(4), 404-405.

Singh NB, Verma KK. 1993. Performance of rained Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in relation to spacing in diara land of eastern Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agronomy 38(4), 654-656.

Singh RP, Kumar A. 1990. Effects of varieties and planting geometry levels on late sown mustard. Indian Journal of Agronomy 60(6), 392-395.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dicky DK. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics, A biological approach 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill, inc. Book corporation new york, 352-358.

Swanton CJ, Nkoa R, Blackshaw RE. 2015. Experimental methods for crop–weed competition studies. Weed Science 63, 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00062.1

Related Articles

Modelling the current and future distribution of Okoubaka aubrevillei Pellegr. & Normand under climate change scenarios in Côte d’Ivoire

Sié Fernand Pacôme Ouattara, Franck Placide Junior Pagny, Kouassi Bruno Kpangui, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 237-246, November 2025.

Proximate analysis of pelleted sorghum-based feeds as substitute for corn

I. I. Juan S. Daquioag, Michael M. Uy, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 232-236, November 2025.

Evolution of the weight of carcasses and offal of Cobb 500 broiler chickens according to the age of slaughter

Soro Soronikpoho, Kouadio Kouakou Parfait, Kouassi Koffi Dongo, Brou Gboko Konan Gatien, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 225-231, November 2025.

Agronomic performance of the newly pruned coffee trees at the CSU Lal-lo old coffee plantation

Maribel L. Fernandez, Florante Victor M. Balatico, Ronel A. Collado, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 217-224, November 2025.

A comprehensive review and meta-analysis on Alzheimer’s genetics: Exploring the genetic architecture and its application in future genomic medicine

Shafee Ur Rehman, Shabeer Khan, Muhammad Usman, Sakarie Khadar Ibrahim, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 204-216, November 2025.

Effect of aqueous leaf extract of Senna occidentalis (Fabaceae) on induced arrhythmia in Rabbits

Obrou Jean Luc Amiltone, Nagalo Ousmane, Mossoun Mossoun Arsène, Abo Kouakou Jean-Claude, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 198-203, November 2025.

Targeting proteolytic enzymes in the hemoglobin degradation pathway to inhibit Plasmodium falciparum: An in silico approach

Sethupathi Virumandi, Elumalai Balamurugan, Aakash Ganesan, Sowmiya Ganesan, Srinidhi Raveenthiran, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 182-197, November 2025.

Composition and variation of milk from Djallonké goats fed with different diets in Burkina Faso

Alice Gisèle Sidibé-Anago, Vinsoun Millogo, Assouan Gabriel Bonou, Remadji Rufine Djikoldingam, Mariétou Sissao, Michel Kéré, Guy Apollinaire Mensah, Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 173-181, November 2025.