Microbial content of pasteurized cattle milk at different packaging materials and storage duration

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2018
Views (822)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Microbial content of pasteurized cattle milk at different packaging materials and storage duration

Babylyn P. Canceran
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 13(3), 117-121, September 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Milk is an important source of nutrients to human and animals, but due to its high water activity and nutritional value it serves as an excellent medium for growth of many kind of microorganisms under suitable conditions. This study determined the presence and levels of microbial content of pasteurized cattle milk using three packaging materials: Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), tetra pack and glass and stored at different durations: six (6), twelve (12) and twenty (24) hours. Samples were subjected to microbiological analysis for Aerobic Plate Count at the Department of Science and Technology (DOST), Tuguegarao City. Results showed that PET packaging material produced the least mean microbial load and recorded the most delayed production and growth of microbes at different storage durations. Using ANOVA, analysis further showed that the combined effect of the packaging material and storage duration on the mean microbial load of dairy milk is significant (P>0.01). Results imply that the use of PET packaging material allows dairy milk to be stored for a longer period with the least growth of microorganisms compared to the use of glass and tetra pack packaging materials.

Abdelrahman SMA, AMM, Said Ahmed IEM, El Zubeir OAO, El Owni MKA, Ahmed. 2009. Microbiological and Physicochemical Properties of Raw Milk Used for Processing Pasteurized Milk in Blue Nile Dairy Company (Sudan). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 3(4), 3433-3437.

Anderson, Melisa. 2011. “The Microbial Content of Unexpired Pasteurized Milk Selected Supermarkets in a Developing Country” Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 205-211.

Batool, Syeda Afifa, Kalsoom, Razia, Rauf, Naseem, Tahir SS, Hussain, Fouzia. 2012. Microbial and Physico-Chemical Quality Assessment of the Raw and Pasteurized Milk Supplied In the Locality of Twin City of Pakistan. Internet Journal of Food Safety 14, p.17-22 .

Bertu WJ, Dapar M, Gusi AM, Ngulukun SS, Leo S, Jwander LD. 2010. Prevalence of brucella antibodies in marketed milk in Jos and environs. African Journal of Food Science 4(2), 062-064.

Brock TD, Madigan, Biology of microorganisms MT. 1991. 6th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1991. p. 345.

Dey S, Krim MH. 2013. Study on Physicochemical and Microbial Quality of Available Raw, Pasteurized and UHT Milk during Preservation. Int. J. Sci. Invent. Today 2(2), 150-157.

Griffiths, Mansel W. 2010. Improving the Safety and Quality of Milk: Milk Production and Processing. Woodhead Publishing Limited.

Gunasekera TS, Sorensen A, Attfield PV, Sorensen J, Veal DA. 2002. Inducible gene expression by non-culturable bacteria in milk after pasteurization. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002; 68(4), 1988-1993.

IDFA. 2016. Grade “A” Pasteurized Milk Ordinance, 2015 Revision. Retrieved March 30, 2018.Making a Difference for Dairy.https://www.idfa.org/news-views/headline-news/article/2016/03/31/2015-pmo-and-related-documents-now-available-online.

Koirala, Sushil. 2016. Quality and Safety Assessment ofMmilk Supply Chain: A Case Study. Asian Institute of Technology.

MAK BIOTEk. 2017. “Understanding Milk Adulterstion in India” iOrganic.Retieved Feb 10, 2018.

Mosalagae D, Pfukenyi DM, Matope G. 2011. Milk producer’s awareness of milk-borne zoonoses in selected smallholder and commercial dairy farms of Zimbabwe. Tropical Animal Health and Production 43, 733-739.

Olatunji EA1, Jubril AE1, Okpu EO1, Olafadehan OA1, Ijah UJ2, Njidda AA. “Bacterial Assessment and Quality Analysis of Raw Milk Sold in Gwagwalada Area Council of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT)” Abuja, Nigeria.

Padilla, Nathaly C. 2017. Foodborne Bacteria in Dairy Products: Detection by Molecular Techniques. Departamento de Cienciasanimales. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. https//scielo.conicyt. cl/pdf/ciagr/v44n3/0304-5609-ciagr-44-03-0215.pd.

Sarkar S. 2015. Microbiological Considerations: Pasteurized Milk. International Journal of Dairy Science 10, 206-218.

Related Articles

In vitro assessment of Bambara groundnut M3 mutant genotypes for resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. in the seedling stage in Burkina Faso

Brahime Tingueri*, Souleymane Ouattara, Adjima Ouoba, Romain W. Soalla, Mahamadi Hamed Ouedraogo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 141-149, June 2026.

Impact of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae on biochemical and antioxidant enzymes in Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) infesting oil palm

M. Malarvizhi, N. Santhana Bharathi, K. Sujatha*, A. Vijaya Anand, R. Manikandan, J. P. Antony Prabhu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 129-140, June 2026.

Typhoon risk perception and preparedness after Sendong in Bayug Island

Dinah Millendez*, Lex Rei Brendon Hilario, Jay Rey Alovera, Elizabeth Edan Albiento, Melgie Alas, Peter Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 120-128, June 2026.

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.