Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.6(1), 1-6, January 2015
In present research work 24 genotypes of cucumber were evaluated to find out their similarities and differences based on numerical traits. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RBCD) with two replications. Numerical traits of the genotypes were measured according to the coding criteria specified by European Cooperative Programmed for Plant Genetics Resources (ECPGR) 2008. Data showed great variation for almost all the traits. Maximum germination (67.5%) was observed in genotype Mardan local while minimum germination (17.5%) was recorded in genotype 28295. The genotypes Haripur local and 28293 showed early flowering. Similarly highest yield was observed in USA Poinsett, Dargai local and Mardan local. These genotypes could be chosen for crossing with other genotypes like 28295 and Sialkot selection having low germination rate and low yield to get a better genotype of cucumber with high germination and maximum yield. Correlation analysis represent that yield was positively correlated with fruit length (.523** P≤0.01) and fruit width (.439* P≤0.01). While fruit per plant showed positive significant correlation with vine length. Present findings are applicable in cucumber cultivation in swat and other areas with similar climatic conditions. This will intern help to improve the economic return and revenue generation of the farmers.
Akhunzada MK, Wadan D, Khan H. 2007. Technology for cucumber Production (crop production bulletin no.1) Agriculture Research Institute Mingora Swat. (1-5) p.
FAO. 2006. Cucumber Production in Pakistan. http:/www.faostat.fao.org.
Gopalan C, Rama SBV, Balasubramanian SC. 1982. Nutritive value of Indian Foods, Indian Council Med. Res., Natl. Instt Nutr., Hyderabad. India.
Al-Rawahi M, Al-Said F, Khan IA, Al-Khanjary S. 2011. Diversity of cucumber accessions in Oman. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 13, 505–510.
Hamid A, Baloch JUD, Khan NU. 2002. Performance of six cucumber genotypes in swat. Pakistan International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 04, 91–492.
Ahmed M, Abdul H, Zarqa A. 2004. Growth and Yield Performance of Six cucumber (Cucumissativus L.) Cultivars Under Agro- Climatic Conditions of rawalakot, azad jammu and kashmir. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 6, 396–399.
Abusaleha Dutta OP. 1988. Interrelationship of yield components in cucumber. Veg. Science 15(1), 75-85.
Krishna Prasad VSR, Singh DP. 1994. Standardized potence and combining ability in slicing cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Indian Journal of Horticulture 51(1), 77-84.
Hormuzdi SG, More TA. 1989. Studies on combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Indian Journal of Genetics 49(2), 161-166.
Lawal AB. 2006. Response of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) to intercropping with maize (Zea mays L.) and varying rates of farmyard manures and inorganic fertilizer.Nigeria. 268.
Miano NM, Memon GH, Ghilzai AN, Khushik AM. 1991. Varietal trial on Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Sindh Journal of Research 8, 30.
Resende GM, De. 1999. Yield of pickling cucumber in the north of Minars Gerais State, Brazilian Journal Horticulture Brasil 17, 57–60.
Saha RR, Mitra BN, Hossain AE, Jamaluddin M, Mosiul Hoque AMM. 1992. Genetic variability, character association and path co-efficient analysis in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschta L.). Bangladesh Hort., 20(1), 59-62.
Sharma AK, Vidyasagr Pathania NK. 2000. Studies on combining ability for earliness and marketable fruit yield in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Himachal Journal of Agriculture and Research, 26(1&2), 54-61.
Wang YH, Joobeur T, Dean RA, Staub JE. 2007. Cucurbits Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants 5, Vegeta.