Morpho-physiological characteristics response of hull-less barley genotypes to water deficit stress

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2014
Views (664)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Morpho-physiological characteristics response of hull-less barley genotypes to water deficit stress

Mozhgan Herischi, Mehrdad Yarnia
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 5(4), 461-468, October 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

In order to investigated the morpho-physiological characteristics response of hull-less barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes to water deficit stress an experiment was conducted in the split plot form based on completely randomized block design with three replications during growing seasons of 2013-2014. Treatments were water deficit stress in five levels contain irrigation each 7, 14, 21 days, cut of irrigation at heading stage and non irrigation (dry land condition). The second factor was 10 hulls-less barley genotypes. The analysis of variance showed that significant effect of water deficit stress on plant height and interaction effect between water deficit stress and genotype on spike length, number of fertile tiller, number of non fertile tiller and spikes number (P< 0.01), and leaf number, awn length, spikelet number (P< 0.05). The detailed results of the study showed that water deficit stress caused to decrease all of these characteristics and the various genotypes have different reactions in water deficit stress conditions. The correlations results appears that there is a positive correlation between spike number and plant height, the number of fertile tiller and peduncle length.

Aharizad S, Zaefizadeh M, Mehdipour M. 2013. Salinity  tolerance  of  hull-less  barley  genotypes  in germination stage. World Essays Journal. 1(1), 1-6.

Anjum SA, Xie XY, Wang LC, Saleem MF, Man C, Lei W. 2011. ‘Morphological, physiological and biochemical  responses  of  plants  to  drought  stress (Review  article)’.  African  Journal  of  Agricultural Research. 6(9), 2026-2032.

Bray EN. 2001. Plant response to water-deficit stress. Encyclopaedia of Life Science. Nature Publishing Group / www.els.net

Bak S, Taxa FE, Feldamannab KA, Galbaritha DW, Feyereisene R. 2001. CYP83B1, a cytochrome P450 at the metabolic branch point in Auxin and Indol glocosinolat biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 13,(1)101-111.

Din  J,  Khan  SU,  Ali  I,  Gurmani  AR.  2011. Physiological  and  agronomic  response  of  canola varieties to drought stress. The Journal of Animal and Plant Science. 21(1), 339-345.

Drikvand R, Samiei K, Hosseinpor T. 2011. Path coefficient analysis in hull-less barley under rainfed condition. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science. 5(12), 277-279.

Georgian E, Chambers JC, Blank R. 2009. Effects of water and nitrogen availability on nitrogen contribution by the legume, Lupines argenteus Pursh. Applied Soil Ecology. 42, 200-208.

Umebese CE, Olatimilehin TO, Ogunsusi TA. 2009. ‘Salicylic acid protects nitrate reductase activity, growth and proline in amaranth and tomato plants during water deficit’. American Journal of Agriculture and Biology Science. 4(3), 224-229.

Fathi G, Macdonald G. 1998. Compaction of nitrogen transferring capability of six varieties of barley under dryness condition that arises during at the grain filling period. Agriculture Science. 20, 1-6.

Feng D, Feng-Ling F, Wan-chen L. 2009. Differential gene expression in response to drought stress in maiz seedling. Agriculture Science in China. 8(7), 767-776.

Georgian E, Chambers JC, Blank R. 2009. Effects of water and nitrogen availability on nitrogen contribution by the legume, Lupines argenteus Pursh. Applied Soil Ecology. 42, 200-208.

Gou J, Strauss SH, Jui Tsai C, Fang K, Chen Y, Jiang X, Busov VB. 2010. Giberellins regulate lateral root formation in populous through interactions with Auxin and other hormones. The Plant Cell. 22, 623-639.

Hu J, Mitchum MG, Barnaby N, Ayele BT, Ogawa M, Nam E, Lai W, Hanada A, Aloson JM, Ecker JR, Swain SM, Yamaguchi S, Kamiya Y, Sun T. 2008. Potential sites of bioactive gibberellin production during reproductive growth in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 20, 320-336.

Komatsuda T, Pourkheirandish M, He C, Azhaguvel P, Kanamori H, Peroviv D, stein N, Graner A, Wicker T, Tagiri A, Lundqvist U, Fujimura T, Matsuoka M, Matsumoto T, Yano M. 2007. Six-rowed barley originated from a mutation in a homeodomain-leucine zipper I-class homeobox gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104, 4124-1429.

Lodiero A, Golnazez RP, Hernandez A, Balague LJ, Favelukes G. 2000. Comparison of drought tolerance in nitrogen-fixing and inorganic nitrogen-grown beans. Plants Science. 154, 31-41.

Pachepskey Y, Rawela WJ. 2004. Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology. Developments in soil. Elevier: Amsterdam. 44, 512-705.

Rajala A, Hakala K, Makela P, Murienen S, Poltone-Sainino P. 2009. Spring wheat response to timing of water deficit through sink and grain filling capacity. Field Crops Research. 114(2), 236-271.

Reynolds M, Jhon Foulkes M, Gustavo AS, Berry P, Martin A, Parry J, Snape W, William J. 2009. Raising yield potential in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany. 60, 1899-1918.

Related Articles

Dietary Aloe vera improves growth and hematology in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Fatima Khan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 89-99, April 2026.

Intercropping camphor basil shrubs with selected food crops for ecosystem services in the upper midland agroecological zone of Western Kenya

Reuben K. B. Chumba*, Alex Awiti, Francis Namasaka Muyekho, Vitalis Ogemah, Jacob Omollo, Yosef Kidane Gebrehawariat, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 73-88, April 2026.

Surveillance and detection of African swine fever on abbatoir in different municipalities of third district of Cagayan, Philippines

Maricel F. Campanano, John Michael M. Melad, Mary Ann M. Santos*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 65-72, April 2026.

Mobile-based potato leaf disease identifier using ensemble modeling

Karen W. Cantilang*, Laarni M. Ladiao, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 58-64, April 2026.

Diagnostic analysis of pig farms in the North of Côte d’Ivoire: Case of the commune of Korhogo

Seni Kouadio Sylvain*, Kadjo Vincent, Alla Konan Jean Bedel, Yao Koffi Sylvanus Aubert, N’glouan Wadjé Jérôme, Soro Ouation Souleymane, Kouassi Koffi Dongo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 48-57, April 2026.

Coral reef condition in Illana Bay, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines: Basis for conservation management

Ruel S. Lasagas, Rosanilio M. Yagos*, Edgardo H. Rosales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 40-47, April 2026.

Preliminary floral and faunal species diversity in Maluyo River in Santol, La Union, Philippines

Judith M. Morales*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 26-39, April 2026.

Challenges and impact of the farmer-scientists training program on community development in Bohol, Philippines

Jeffrey O. Awas*, Anabel J. Intong, Aida T. Salingay, Manolito C. Macalolot, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 8-25, April 2026.