Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Morphological characteristics of the Philippines CARAGA black native chicken

Research Paper | November 15, 2022

| Download 88

Tomas M. Austral Jr, Benecar B. Olaybar, Shernelyn S. Palma, Escolastico S. Cagatin, Lutess C. Gallardo

Key Words:

J. Bio. Env. Sci.21( 5), 72-78, November 2022


JBES 2022 [Generate Certificate]


The study was performed to describe the morphological characteristics of the Caraga black native chicken. A total of 40 heads of the native chickens (8 roosters and 32 hens) were used. The test animals are the product of the breeding and purification project of the Caraga black native chicken. The result of the morphological characteristics shows a predominant black coloration on the significant body parts of the native chicken, such as black plumage, black comb, black air lobe, black shank, black skin color, dark–brown Iris, dark grey beak, grayish meat, black bones, and black wattle shanks. Moreover, quantitative body measurements on 12-month-old native chicken recorded that the rooster is heavier (1.9Kg), taller (33cm), and has a higher body length (24cm) than the hen (weight = 1,350g, height = 28.5cm, body length = 24cm). Based on the findings, hens are generally smaller than roosters, which can be attributed to the body build of roosters. Males, naturally, are suited for muscle building, while the hens’ body is built for reproduction.


Copyright © 2022
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Morphological characteristics of the Philippines CARAGA black native chicken

Alano J. 2015. Native Chicken: the healthiest chicken for Filipinos [Internet][cited 2022 May 1]. Available from https://filipinohealthline.com /2019/09/07/native-chicken-health-benefits/.

Bittel J. 2019. This chicken has black bones, organs, and meat: Here’s why [Internet] [cited 2022 July 20]. Available from: https:// api. nationalgeographic. com/distribution/ public/amp/animals/2019/09/ why-black chickens fibromelanosis?

Darwin CR. 1874. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. 2d ed. Appleton, New York 1874.

Dharmayanthi AB, Terai Y, Sulandari S, Zein MS, Akiyama T, Satta Y. 2017. The origin and evolution of fibromelanosis in domesticated chickens: genomic comparison of Indonesian Cemani and Chinese Silkie breeds. Plos one 12(4), e0173147.

Dorshorst B, Okimoto R, Ashwell C. 2010. Genomic regions associated with dermal hyperpigmentation, polydactyly and other morphological traits in the Silkie chicken. Journal of Heredity 101(3), 339-50.

Dusaran RN, Pabulayan RAV. 2012. Production practices of the native chicken growers in Western Visayas. Patubas 7(1), 40-65.

Dusaran R, Cabarles J. 2005. Native chicken production study in the top three native chicken producing municipalities of Iloilo. Research report submitted to the University Research Center, Central Philippine University, Iloilo City.

Faraco CD, Vaz SA, Pástor MV, Erickson CA. 2001. Hyperpigmentation in the Silkie fowl correlates with abnormal migration of fate‐restricted melanoblasts and loss of environmental barrier molecules. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists 220(3), 212-25.

Food and Agriculture Organizations. 2011. Phenotypic characterization of animal genetic resources FAO.

Gaither MR, Rocha LA. 2013. Origins of species richness in the Indo‐Malay‐Philippine biodiversity hotspot: Evidence for the centre of overlap hypothesis. Journal of Biogeography 40(9), 1638-1648.

Godinez CJP, Dadios PJD, Espina DM, Matsunaga M, Nishibori M. 2021. Population Genetic Structure and Contribution of Philippine Chickens to the Pacific Chicken Diversity Inferred From Mitochondrial DNA. Frontiers in Genetics 12.

Haw SG. 2006. Marco Polo’s China: a Venetian in the realm of Khubilai Khan. Routledge.

Hutt FB. 1949. Genetics of the fowl. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Iskandar S, Seapudin Y. 2005. Germplasm, Cemani chicken (qualitative characteristics, quantitative characteristics, breeding procedure, preservation and research efforts). Available: www.balitnak.litbang.deptan.go.id

Kuklenski J. 1915. Über das vorkommen und die verteilung des pigmentes in den organen und geweben bei japanischen seidenhühnern. Cohen.

Lambio AL. 2000. Philippine native chickens. Philippine Agricultural Scientist (Philippines).

Lecoin L, Gabella G, Le Douarin N. 1996. Origin of the c-kit-positive interstitial cells in the avian bowel. Development 122(3), 725-33.

Lukanov H, Genchev A. 2013. Fibromelanosis in domestic chickens. Agricultural Science and Technology 5(3), 239-46.

Łukasiewicz M, Niemiec J, Wnuk A, MroczekSosnowska N. 2015. Meat quality and the histological structure of breast and leg muscles in Ayam Cemani chickens, Ayam Cemani× Sussex hybrids and slow‐growing Hubbard JA 957 chickens. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 95(8), 1730-5.

Muryanto M. 1991. Malajah poultry Indonesia No. 132/XII, pp. 16-20.

Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772), 853-858.

Reedy MV, Faraco CD, Erickson CA. 1998. Specification and migration of melanoblasts at the vagal level and in hyperpigmented Silkie chickens. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists 213(4), 476-85.

Rogelio Jr VL, Lambio AL, Vega RS, De Guia AP. 2013. Phenotypic characterization of native chicken in Palawan, Philippines. Philippine Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 39(2).

Sarian Z. 2019. Do your own experiment: Purify your own native chicken; it can be challenging, rewarding, at times frustrating. Agri News. Retrieved from https://zacsarian.com/do-your-own-experimen t-purify-your-own-native-chicken-it-can-be-challenging-rewarding-at-times-frustrating/