Optimum water requirement of some boro rice mutant lines

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/11/2014
Views (679)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Optimum water requirement of some boro rice mutant lines

F. Aftab, M.N. Islam, M.A.A. Sarkar, M.M. Rahman , M.A. Rahman
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 5(5), 124-134, November 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The study was conducted to find out the effect of irrigation on yield and optimum water requirement of some Boro rice mutant lines developed by Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA) and the check variety BRRIdhan 28. The rice mutant lines (RM-200©-1-17, RM-200©-1-1, RM-200©-1-13) and BRRIdhan 28 were grown maintaining five irrigation treatments. The treatments were arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Irrigation showed significant effect on the yield and yield contributing characters of different rice mutant lines and the check variety. The highest grain yield of 6.9 t ha-1 was obtained in treatment T4 where irrigation applied to make 7 days after disappearance of previous water was imposed to the crop. It was also found that the crop grown under continuous ponding and continuous saturation of T0 and T1 treatments respectively did not increase the yield, rather caused the wastage of irrigation water. Among the three rice mutant lines and the check variety, the yield of the mutant lines were 6.08 t ha-1 in RM-200©-1-17, 6.79 t ha-1 in RM-200©-1-1, 6.20 t ha-1 in RM-200©-1-13 and 6.02 t ha-1 in BRRIdhan 28. The highest yield was 6.79 t ha-1 in treatment RM-200©-1-1.The mutant line RM-200©-1-1 was found to be superior over the other two mutant lines, and The treatment T4 was the optimum water stress condition for the check variety which produced the highest yield. The water use efficiency was 0.033 t ha-1cm-1 in T0, 0.045 t ha-1cm-1 in T1, 0.125 t ha-1cm-1 in T2, 0.168 ha-1cm-1 in T3 and 0.216 t ha-1cm-1 in T4. The water use efficiency (WUE) was the highest (0.216 t ha-1cm-1) in treatment T4, obviously due to minimum water use. Therefore, from the experimental findings, it was revealed that irrigation treatment of T4 gave the highest yield which would help to lessen extra cost.

Alam MM. Mondal MK. 2003. Comparative water requirements and management practices for hybrid and inbred rice cultivation in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Agril. Sci. 30(2), 345-351.

Annonymous. 1997. Fertilizer Recommendation Guide, Bangladesh. Agricultural Research Council, Farmgate, New Air Road, Dhaka-1215, 67.

BBS. 2010. Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh, Bangladesh  Bureau  of  Statistics.  Statistic  Division, Ministry  of  Planning,  Government  of  the  People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka.

Cruj JC, Brandao SS, Guidice RM, Ferreirs PA, Loureiro BT. 1975. Effect of different soil moisture tension at two stages of plant development in relation to growth and yield of rice (Oryza Sativa). Expt. Stat., Andra Pradesh, India 19, 187-209.

Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. Second Edn., International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Manila, The Phillipines, 204-207.

IRRI. 1970.  International Rice Research Institute. Los Banos, Philipines, 170-179.

Islam MJ, Mondal MK. 1992. Water management strategy for increasing monsoon rice production in Bangladesh. Agril. Water Mgt. 22, 335-343.

Mandal BK, Chatterjee BN. 1984. Growth and yield performance of selected rice varieties during cooler months under two water regimes. Indian J. Agron. 29(1), 94-100.

Monalo EB. 1976. Agro-climatic survey of Bangladesh. IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines.

Raju RA. 1980. Effect of irrigation regimes on agronomic characters of rice. Intl. Rice Res. Inst., Joydevpur, Gazipur, Dhaka, 243-244.

Related Articles

Diagnosis of soil fertility and market gardening systems in the department of Sinématiali (Lokoli and Pegnankaha), northern Ivory Coast

Siaka Coulibaly*, Krogba Yves Nangah, Kouamé Firmin Konan, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 39-50, February 2026.

Analysis of soil fertility status based on pH, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium parameters across different land locations in south Kalimantan

Hastirullah Fitrah*, Agung Cahyo Legowo, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 34-38, February 2026.

Evaluation of the distribution of Irvingia gabonensis in the peripheral zone of Taï national park (South-West, Ivory Coast)

Ybo Marc Gboazo*, Coulibaly Siendou, Traoré-Ouattara Karidia, Diarrassouba Abdoulaye, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 23-33, February 2026.

Integration of smart irrigation with AI-based disease detection: A field-based agro-technical evaluation for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Mvondo Nganti Dorothée*, Nchange Kouotou Adamou, Mefire Nchouwat Youssouf, Nana Modeste, Lombeko Tomo Obe Victorine, Manga Essouma François, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 12-22, February 2026.

Spatial distribution and pest pressure on key crops in Nyeri county, Kenya using agro-ecological zone -based sampling

M. Muriithi*, J. W. Wakagwa, P. G. Maina, D. Gatahi, A. Njeri , Maina Mwangi, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.

Analysis of the factors influencing the adoption of improved rice seeds on farm resilience to climate change in the Tandjile Province of Chad

Mahamat Mallah Choukou*, Salomon Kelgue, Gauthier Biaou, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(1), 6-18, January 2026.

Phenotypic and molecular screening for resistance in elite cassava clones against cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) in Kenya

Geofrey S. Ombiro, George N. Mose, Elijah M. Ateka, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(6), 1-8, December 2025.