Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Participatory tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill) variety evaluation and selection for yield and quality in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Research Paper | April 1, 2018

| Download 12

Shumbulo Abrham, Ketema Selamawit, Alemu Yosef, Ayele Lemma

Key Words:

Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.12( 4), 70-77, April 2018


IJAAR 2018 [Generate Certificate]


The experiment was conducted under field conditions at Humbo, Wolaita zone in 2015 to 2016 using 10 tomato varieties with the objectives to identify and select the best performing tomato varieties in terms of yield, quality and to promote tomato production technologies and productivity using RCBD with three replications. Combined ANOVA revealed that there was statistically significant difference among varieties in all traits recorded. The highest marketable fresh fruit yield (37560kg/ha) was recorded by variety ‘Melkashola’ while the lowest (21595kg/ha) was recorded by ‘Chali’ indicating the marketable yield range of 15,965kg/ha due to variety difference in performance. Similarly, the highest total fresh fruit yield (39,599kg/ha) and that of the lowest (23949kg/ha) was recorded by varieties ”Melkashola’ and ‘Chali’, respectively, having total yield range of (15,650Kg/ha). The result depicted that Eshete, Fetan and Melkashola were among the top three varieties selected for fresh fruit yield. On other fruit quality and yield related traits such as fruit diameter and average fruit weight, varieties Metadel, Eshete and Bishola were superior. The varieties Cochoro and Fetan were observed to be the best varieties in TSS with highest value 6.25oBrix which could be the best for processing. Correlation coefficient analysis indicated that plant height was highly strongly and positively correlated with marketable fresh fruit yield (0.79) and total fresh fruit yield (0.77). Fruit diameter and average fruit weight were highly positively correlated (0.94) whereas total soluble solid was negatively correlated with almost all other growth and yield traits.The farmer’ preferences based on fruit size, color and field performance also revealed that varieties Eshete, Melkashola, Fetan, Melkaselsa and Metadel were better selected candidates for yield and quality. Therefore, varieties such as Eshete, Fetan and Melkashola could be recommended for fresh local and national markets while Cochoro would be selected for processing among the tested varieties.


Copyright © 2018
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Participatory tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill) variety evaluation and selection for yield and quality in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Abu T, Teddy T. 2013. Tomato Production in Ethiopia Challenged by Pest. Global Agricultural Information Network, Grain report number 1305, pp1-3, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Alemayehu N, Hoekstra D, Berhe K, Jaleta M. 2010. Irrigated vegetable promotion and expansion: The case of Ada’a District, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Improving the productivity and market success of Ethiopian Farmers (IPMS) Case Study Report, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Bezabih E, Afari-Sefa V, Fekadu FD, Amsalu A, Tesfaye B, Milkessa T. 2015. Characterization and Assessment of Vegetable Production and Marketing Systems in the Humid Tropics of Ethiopia. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 54(2), 163-187.

CSA (Central Statistical Authority). 2013. Report on area and production of major crops. Statistical bulletin.

Desalegn R, Wakene T, Addis S. 2016. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) varieties evaluation in Borana zone, Yabello district, southern Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 8(10), 206-210. DOI: 10.5897/JPBCS2015.0543

EIA (Ethiopian Investment Agency). 2012. Investment Opportunity profile for the Production of Fruits and vegetables in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

FAO (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization). 2009. FAOSTAT statistical database, Rome.

Gebisa B, Gezu D, Alemayehu B, Fikadu T. 2017. Performance Evaluation of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Varieties Under Supplemental Irrigation at Erer Valley, Babile District, Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Sciences 5(1), 1-5. DOI: 10.11648/j.jps.20170501.11

Hossain MF, Ara N, Islam MR, Hossain J, Akhter B. 2014. Effect of different sowing dates on yield of tomato genotypes. Int. J. Agril. Res. Innov. & Tech. 4(1), 40-43. Available online at: www.ijarit.webs.com

Isah A Sh. 2014. Productivity of Tomato Varieties in Response to NPK Fertilizer and Green Manure Rates. PhD Thesis, Department of Agronomy Faculty of Agriculture, Zaria University, Nigeria.

Lemma D. 2002. Tomato research experiences and production prospects, Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization Research Report, No.43.

Oko-Ibom GO, Asiegbu JE. 2007. Aspects of tomato fruit quality as influenced by cultivar and scheme of fertilizer application. Journal of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Extension 6(1), 1-11.

Souza LM, Melo PCT, Luders RR, Melo AMT. 2012. Correlations between yield and fruit quality characteristics of fresh market tomatoes. Horticultura Brasileira 30, 627-631.

Wali AS, Kabura BH. 2014. Correlation Studies in Tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum L. Karst) as Affected by Mulching and Cultivar During the Heat Period in the Semi-Arid Region of Nigeria. International Letters of Natural Sciences 10(2014), 1-7.