Performance of Wheat As Influenced By Integrated Nutrient Management

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2021
Views (772)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Performance of Wheat As Influenced By Integrated Nutrient Management

Rojina Akter, Md. Rashedul Islam, Mustafa Kamal Shahadat, Meherunnesa Tamanna, Mostarak Hossain Munshi
Int. J. Biosci. 19(4), 139-143, October 2021.
Keywords: Bio-slurry, Wheat, Yield
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2021; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The experiment was conducted at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Rahmatpur, Barisal during Rabi season of 2016-2017 and 2017-18 to find out the suitable combination of inorganic fertilizers and organic fertilizers with proper planting technique in a randomized complete block design. Nine treatments viz.T1=100%of RF+Bio-slurry 0 tha-1,T2= 100% of RF+Bio-slurry 5 tha-1,T3=100% of RF+Bio-slurry10tha-1,T4=50% of RF+ Bio-slurry 0 tha-1,T5=50%of RF+Bio-slurry 5tha-1,T6=50% of RF+Bio-slurry10tha-1,T7=75% of RF +Bio-slurry 0tha-1,T8=75% of RF+Bio-slurry 5tha-1,T9=75% of RF + Bio-slurry 10tha-1. The result revealed that when 100% recommended dose of fertilizers was used with 10 tha-1 of bio-slurry gave the highestyield (3.96 and 3.86 tha-1) which was statistically similar to the yield (3.91 and 3.84tha-1) in T9 treatment where 10tha-1 of bio-slurry was applied with 75% of recommended fertilizers.

Abubaker J. 2012. Effects of fertilization with biogas residues on crop yield, soil microbiology and greenhouse gas emissions. PhD thesis, Department of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, p 1–79.

Akanbi WB, Togun AO, Adediran JA, Ilupeju DE. 2010. Growth, dry matter and fruit yields components of okra under organic and inorganic sources of nutrients. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 4, 1-13.

BBS. 2017. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistical Year Book of Bangladesh, Statistics Division.

Bonten LT, Zwart KB, Rietra RP, Postma R, De Haas MJ, Nysingh SL. 2014. Bio-slurry as fertilizer: is bio-slurry from household digesters a better fertilizer than manure? A literature review.  Alterra report 2519. Alterra Wageningen UR, Wageningen, p 50.

Caravaca F, Lax A, Albaladejo J. 1999.  Organic matter, nutrient contents and cation exchange capacity in fine fractions from semiarid calcareous soils. Geoderma 93, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00045-2

FRG. 2012. Fertilizer Recommendation Guide, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC), Farmgate, Dhaka, p 58-60, 259.

Gaur AC, Neblakantan S, Dargan KS. 1984. Organic manures ICAR. New Delhi. 159.

Haque MA, Jahiruddin M, Rahman MM, Saleque MA. 2015. Usability of bioslurry to improve system productivity and economic return under potato-rice cropping system. Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries 2(1), 27-33.

Haynes RJ, Naidu R.1998. Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review. Nutrient Cycling in Agro Ecosystems 51, 123-137.

Mondal. 2000. Project report, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute,Bio-slurry management and its effect on soil fertilizer and crop production, p 5.

Zebider A. 2011. The contribution of biogas production from cattle manure at household level for forest conservation and soil fertility improvement.  MScthesis, Science Faculty, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Zech W. 1996. Patterns and regulations of organic matter transformation insoils: litter decomposition and humification. Flux control in biological systems: from enzymes to populations and ecosystems, p 303-334.

Related Articles

Anti-proliferative potential of seed derived proteins from Vitis vinifera and Mangifera indica

Hareeshthulasi, V. Vinotha, R. Rajakumar*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 129-137, April 2026.

Valorisation of table waste and fruit waste by black soldiers (Ullicens hermetica)

Ayaba Adéline Hounnou, Vanessa Chabi, Jomini Marc Sène Alitonou, Franck Sokenou, Mickael Vitus Martin Kpessou Saïzonou, Fidèle Paul Tchobo, Guy Alain Alitonou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 123-128, April 2026.

Murraya koenigii (Linn.) Spreng.: An opulent source of fatty acid

Shahin Aziz*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 116-122, April 2026.

Design and architecture of an IoT-enabled bamboo resource management system: Data-driven approach for sustainable agriculture

Charlot L. Maramag*, Dorothy M. Ayuyang, Richard R. Ayuyang, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 107-115, April 2026.

Physicochemical and microbiological characterization of flours from the local variety of purple corn (Zea mays L.) produced and marketed in Katiola (Côte d’Ivoire)

Moumouny Traore*, N´Zebo Desiré Kouame, Pepiesin Marie Ange Melem Soro, Zamblé Bi Irié Abel Boli, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 98-106, April 2026.

In the shadows of governance: Exploring youth participation in local peacebuilding initiatives

Juramie R. Rubia, Benny R. Rubia, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 85-97, April 2026.

Evaluation of the agronomic performance, beta-carotene content and dry matter content of 228 sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) genotypes in Burkina Faso

Nattan Gamsore*, Koussao Some, Djakaridja Tiama, Pauline Bationo_Kando, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 73-84, April 2026.

Geomatics tools for agricultural and farm disaster risk management and reduction: A survey of farmers in South-South coastal communities, Nigeria

G. O. Nwodo, O. J. Ugwu, E. U. Onah, A. Ugwuoti, E. Elijah Ebinne*, O. P. Nogheghase, S. I. Ogbaa, U. E. Ahuchaogu, T. O. Ogbuji, C. P. Owuamalam-Chidi, C. O. Osuagwu, M. O. Igwenagu, O. E. Mbakaogu, J. U. Chikaire, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 59-72, April 2026.