Phenotypic characterization of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) accessions conserved at the Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Institute

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2016
Views (211) Download (20)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Phenotypic characterization of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) accessions conserved at the Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Institute

Rudo Musango, Kusena Kudzai, Summerset Mhungu, Handsent Tibugar
J. Bio. Env. Sci.8( 6), 26-36, June 2016.
Certificate: JBES 2016 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to access variability in qualitative and quantitative traits among ten accessions that were obtained from Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Institute (GRBI) in Zimbabwe. The accessions were planted in a Randomized Complete Block Design, with three replicates. The qualitative and quantitative characteristics were recorded using the International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR) common bean descriptor list. The quantitative data for the number of days to fifty percent flowering, plant height, days to maturity, seed size, grain yield and number of seeds per pod were analysed using hierarchical cluster analysis Minitab Release 12.22 version and GenStat Discovery versions 14 software. Cluster analysis divided genotypes in two main groups when the dendrogram was partitioned at the 26:22 % similarity levels. Cluster A comprised of 2 bean genotypes and cluster B comprised of 8 genotypes distributed in 2 sub-groups. Genetic similarity among the accessions varied significantly depending on the genotype pairs, groups and sub-groups. The genetic similarity was lower between accessions of different clusters (A and B) and higher between accessions within each cluster. Significant differences (P<0.01) were observed among the accessions for the number of pods per/plant, number of seeds per pod, length and seed size. Based on different morphological characters exhibited by different accessions, it could be concluded that morphological diversity exists among the ten accessions of common beans. It can also be concluded that there are no duplicate accession among the ten common bean accessions.

VIEWS 7

Beninger M, Hasfied J. 1999. Variation in seed phenotype in beans. Horticultural Science 34, 336-337.

Bisht IS, Pandravada SR, Rana JC, Malik SK, Archna Singh, Singh PB, Firoz Ahmad, Bansal KC. 2014. Subsistence farming, agro-biodiversity and sustainable agriculture: a case study. Journal of agro-ecology and sustainable food systems 38(8), 890-912.

Blair MW, Laura FG, Paul M, Louis B. 2010. Genetic diversity, inter-gene pool introgression and nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus valgris L.) from Central Africa. Theor Applied Genetic 121, 237-248

Borda. 2011. TCO Banco ativo de germoplasm de feijao (Phaseolus vulgaris) Available at plataformarg.cenargen.embrapa.br/pa4-banco-ativo-de-germoplasma-de-feijao-phaseolus vulgaris>Accessed on 18 Jan, 2011.

CIAT. 1987. Standard system for the evaluation of bean germplasm. CIAT, Cali, 54p.

Cilliers AJ, Swanevelder CJ. 2000. The South African germplasm collection of ground, Arachis Hypogea L., and its utility. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 20(2), 93-96.

Gepts P, Bliss FA. 1988. Dissemination pathways of common bean: (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae) deduced from phaseolin electrophoretic variability. II. Europe and Africa. Economic Botany. 42, 86-104.

Graham PH, Ranalli P. 1997. Common bean (Phaseolus vularis L.). Field Crop Research. 131-146.

Harlan JR. 1976. Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188, 618-621.

IBPGR/ICRISAT. 1995. Descriptor for groundnuts. International Biodiversity Plant Genetic Resources, Rome.

Kaplan L, Lynch TF. 1999. Phaseolus (Fabaceae) in archaeology: AMS radiocarbon dates and their significance for pre-colombian agriculture. Economic Botany. 1999, 53, 261-272.

Karp A, Kresovich S, Bhat KV, Ayad WG, Hodgkin T. 1997. Molecular tools in plant genetic resources conversation: a guide to the technologies. IPGRI Technical Bulletin. No.2.

Kelly JD, Kolkman JM, Schneider K. 1998. Breeding for yield in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 102, 343-356.

Kumaga FK, Adiku SGK, Ofori K. 2003. Effect of post-flowering water stress on dry matter and yield of three tropical grain legumes. International Journal for Agricultural Biology 5, 405-407.

Kwak M, Gepts P. 2009. Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Theor Applied Genetics 118, 979-992.

Minitab. 1998. Minitab Release 12.22. Minitab Inc., USA.

Muasya RM, Lommen WJM, Struik PC. 2002a. Seed development in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crops and in different pod fractions within a crop. Field Crops Research 75, 79-89.

Muasya RM, Lommen WJM, Struik PC. 2002b. Development of seed viability and vigour in common bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) crops and in different pod fractions within a crop. Field Crops Research 75, 79-89.

Musvosvi C. 2009. Morphological characterization and interrelationships among descriptors in some cowpea genotypes. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings 9, 501-507.

Papa R, Gepts P. 2003. Asymmetry of gene flow and differential geographical structure of molecular diversity in wild and domesticated Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Mesoamerica. In TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretishe and und angewandt Genetik 106(2), 239-50.

Park SO, Coyne DP, Jung G, Skroch PW, Arnaud- Santana E, Steadman JR, Ariyarathne HM, Nienhuis J. 2000. Mapping of QTL for seed size and shape traits in common bean. Journal for American Social Horticultural Science 125, 466-475.

Rana PK, Kumar P, Singhal VK, Rana JC. 2014. Uses of local plant biodiversity among the tribal communities of Pangi Valley of district Chamba in cold desert Himalaya, India World Science Journal 2014, 753289.

Sarutayophat T, Nualsri C, Santipracha Q, Saereeprasert V. 2007. Characterization and genetic relatedness among 37 yardlong bean and cowpea accessions based on morphological characters and RAPD analysis. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology 29(3), 591-600.

Singh KP, Minakshi B. 2007. Genetic variablility in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Research for Crops 8, 636-637.

Spence C. 2006. Bean Root Rot Disease Management in Uganda. DFID Crop Protection Programme, Final Technical Report, Project R8478. Hortiulture Research International, Wellesbourne, Warwick, UK. 29 p.

Stoilova T, Pereira G. 2013. Assessment of the genetic diversity in a germplasm collection of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) using morphological traits. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(2), 208-215.

Valls JFM. 2007. Caracterizacao de recursos geneticos vegetais. In Nass LL (ed) Recursos geneticos vegetais. Embrapa Recursos Geneticose eBiotecnlongia, Brasilia, 281-305 p.

Vasic MJ, Gvozdanovic-Varga M, Zoric M, Kraljevic-Balalic J, Cervenski. 2010. Analysis of grain size in Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by linear and bilinear models. Genetika. 42(3), 535-544.