home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Phylogenetic relationships between Trigonella species (Bucerates section) using ITS markers and morphological traits

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2013
Views (287) Download (8)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Phylogenetic relationships between Trigonella species (Bucerates section) using ITS markers and morphological traits

Fahimeh Salimpour, Mahsa Safiedin Ardebili, Fariba Sharifnia
J. Bio. Env. Sci.3( 12), 116-124, December 2013.
Certificate: JBES 2013 [Generate Certificate]
Key: FabaceaeIranMolecular markersMorphological charactersTrigonella

Abstract

Trigonella L. (Fabaceae) includes about 135 species worldwide and most of the species are distributed in the dry regions around Mediterranean. Phylogenetic relationships of 18 species of medicagoid and one representative each of genera Trifolium and Melilotus were estimated from DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. Parsimony analysis of the ITS region formed a dendrogram with strong bootstrap support from two groups: Melilotus officinalis together with Trigonella anguina comprise members of subclade A. The subclade B with 100% bootstrap makes up a large clade comprising Trigonella, medicagoides Trigonella as well as Medicago species. Moreover, the subspecies of T. monantha including T. monantha subsp. noeana and T. monantha subsp. geminiflora are at a farther distance from this species. Cluster analysis of morphological characters showed two major groups that joined Medicago and Trigonella (Bucerathes) species together. Accordingly, both maximum parsimony and phenetic study joined medicagoid species more confidently with Medicago rather than with Trigonella. Based on our results, the medicagoids are better joined in Medicago rather than placed in a new genus and reconsideration in Iranica Flora is suggested.

VIEWS 15
Cover PDF

Ahmed MF, Marzouk RI. 2002. A numerical study on the genus Trigonella L. (Leguminosae) in Egypt. Proc. 2nd International Conference of Biological Science. Tanta University 2, 189- 222.

Baum BR. 1968. A clarification of the generic limits of Trigonella and Medicago. Canadian Journal of Botany 46, 741-749.

Bena G, Lejeune B, Prosperi JM, livieri I. 1998. Molecular phylogenetic approach for studying life-history evolution: the ambiguous example of the genus Medicago L. The Royal Society 265, 1141-1151.

Bena G. 2001. Molecular phylogeny supports the morphologically based taxonomic transfer of the “medicagoid” Trigonella species to the genus Medicago L.. Plant Systematic and Evolution 229, 217-236.

Boissier E. 1872. Trigonella L. In: Flora Orientalis (ed. Boissier, E.) 2, 64-91. Conservatoire botaniques de Genève.

Boulos L. 1999. Flora of Egypt. volume 1 (Azollaceae to Oxalidaceae). Al-Hadara Publishing, Cairo, Egypt.

Dangi RS, Lagu MD, Choudhary LB, Ranjekar PK Gupta VS. 2004. Assessment of genetic diversity in Trigonella foenum-graecum and Trigonella caerulea using ISSR and RAPD markers. Plant Biology 4,13-16.

Downie SR, Katz-Downie DS, Rogers EJ, Zujewski HL, Small E. 1998. Multiple independent losses of the plastid rpoC1 intron in Medicago (Fabaceae) as inferred from phylogenetic analyses of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Canadian Journal of Botany 76, 791 – 803.

Ferguson IK, Skvarla JJ. 1981. The Pollen Morphology of the Subfamily Papilionoideae (Leguminosae). In R. M. Polhil and P.H. Raven (Eds), Advances in Legume Systematics. Royal Botanical Garden 2, 859-896.

Gazara M, Kamel W, Haider A. 2001. Cladistic analysis of genera: Trifolium, Trigonella and Melilotus Fabaceae:Papilionaceae) in Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Biology 3, 161-170.

Heyn CC. 1981. Tribe 23. Trifolieae (Bronn) Benth. (1985). In R. M. Polhill and P. H. Raven, Advances in Legume systematic, part 1, Royal Botanical Garden, Kew, 383-385.

Huber-Morath A. 1970.  In:  P.  H.  Davis  (eds.). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 452-482.

Jurzysta MS, Burda W, Oleszek A, Ploszynski M. 1988. The chemotaxonomic significance of laricytrin and medicagenic acid in the tribe Trigonelleae. Canadian Journal of Botany 66, 363-367.

Kawashty SA, Abdalla MF, Gamal EM, Saleh NA. 1998. The chemosystematics of Egyptian Trigonella species. Biochemistry. Systematic Ecology 26, 851-856.

Komarov, VL. 1945. Papilionatae. p. 79-99. In: Shishkin, B. K. (eds.). Izdatel’ stvo Akademi Nauk SSSR Moskova-Leningrad, 79-99.

Marzouk RI. 2006. Seed Protein analyses as a support to the transfer of Trigonella cylindracea Desv. and T. polyceratia (L.) Trautv. To genus Medicago L. Taeckholmia 26, 17-33.

Marzouk RM, EL-Bakatoushi  R.  2011, Assessment of relocation of Trigonella cylindraceae L. and T.polyceratia (L.) trautv.To genus Medicago as inferred by RAPD and RFLP analyses. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43(5), 2289-2294.

Maureira-Butler IJ, Pfeil BE, Muangprom A , Osborn TC, Doyle JJ . 2008 . The reticulate history of Medicago (Fabaceae). Systematic Biology 57, 466 – 482.

Muir G, Schlotterer C. 1999. Limitation to the phylogenetic use of ITS Sequences in closely related species and populations a case study in Quercus petera (Matt) Liebl. Research Program Molecular Tools for Biodiversity (ed. E. M. Gillet).

Ranjbar M, Hajmoradi Z. 2012. Notes on Medicago sect. Lunatae Boiss. and Trigonella sect. Bucerates Boiss. of the tribe Trifolieae (Fabaceae), with two new records from Iran. Iranian Journal of Botany 18(2), 235-238.

Rechinger KH. 1984. In: K. H. Rechinger (eds.). Papilionaceae II, Flora Iranica. Nr. -Akademische Druck-und Verlagsanstaly, Graz, Austria, 207-353.

Safaei Chaei Kar S, Ghanavati F, Mozafari J, Naghavi MR, Amirabadizadeh H, Darvish F. 2012. Phylogenetic relationships of Onobrychis Mill. (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA and morphological traits. Crop Breeding Journal 2(2), 91-99.

Saleh NA, Boulos L, EL-Negoumy SI, Abdalla MF. 1982. A comparative study of the flavonoids of Medicago radiata with other Medicago and related Trigonella species. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 10, 33-36.

Scofield CS. 1908. The botanical history and classification of Alfalfa. US Department of Agricaltural of Plant 13(2), 11-19.

Simon JP. 1969. Serological studies in Medicago, Melilotus, Trigonella and certain other genera. Botanical Gazette 130, 127-141.

Sirjaev G. 1928-1933. Generic Trigonella L. Faculty of Science, Masaryk University.

Small E, Crompton CW, Brookes BS. 1981. The taxonomic value of flora characters in tribe Trigonelleae (Leguminosae) with special reference to Medicago. Canadian Journal of Botany 59(9), 1578-1598.

Small E. 1986. Pollen-ovule pattern in tribe Trifolieae (Leguminosae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 160, 195-205.

Small E. 1987a. A taxonomic study of the “ medicagoid ” Trignella (Leguminosae). Canadian Journal of Botany 65, 1199-1211.

Small E. 1987b. Generic changes in Trifolieae subtribe Trigonellinae. In: Stirton C. H. (ed) Advances in legume systematic. Part 3, Vol. 3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 169-181.

Small  E,  Lassen  P,  Brookes  BS.  1987.  An expanded circumscription of Medicago (Leguminosae, Trifolieae) based on explosive flower tripping. Willdenowia 16, 415- 437.

Small E, 1989. Polythetic generic separation in Trifolieae subtribe Trigonellinae (Leguminosae). Canadian Journal of Botany 67(5), 1480-1492.

Small E, Jomphe M. 1989. A synopsis of the genus Medicago (Leguminosae). Canadian Journal of Botany 67, 3260 – 3294 .

Small E, Fawzy M. 1992. Morphogeographic variation in the Medicago monantha complex. Canadian Journal of Botany 70,1292-1301.

Small E. 2011 . Alfalfa and relatives: Evolution and classification of Medicago . NRC Research Press, Canada.

Steele KP, Yang L , Sabir M, Wojciechowski MF. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the tribes Trifolieaee and Vicieae (Fabaceae) using sequences of Mendel’s stem length gene. Le. Department, American journal of Botany 84 (10), 1407-1419.

Steele KP, Wojciechowski MF. 2003. Phylogenetic analyses of tribes Trifolieae and Vicieae, based on sequences of the plastid gene, matK (Papilionoideae: Leguminosae). In B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau [eds.] Advances in legume systematic. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK, Part 10, 355 – 370.

Steele KP, Ickert-Bond SM. 2010. Phylogeny and character evolution in Medicago (Leguminosae): evidence from analyses of plastid trnK/matK and nuclear GA3OX1 sequences. American Journal of Botany 97, 1142-1155.

Swofford DL. 2001. PAUP٭. Phylogenetic analysis using Parsimony(٭and other methods ). Version 4.ob10. Sinaur, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.

Taeckholm V. 1974. Student’s Flora of Egypt (2ed.). Corporation Printing Company, Beirut.

Taia WK. 2004. Tribe Trifolieae, Evidence from seed characters , Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 7(7), 1287-1302.

Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. Molecular genetics analysis using Maximum likelihood, Evolutionary distance.

Wojciechowski , MF, Sanderson MJ, Steel KP, Liston A. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the “ Temperate Herbaceous Tribed ” of Papilionoid legumes: A supertree approach, In: P.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau (editors). Advances in Legume Systematics, Royal Botanical Garden 9, 277-298.

Wojciechowski MF, Lavin M, Sanderson MJ. 2004. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. American Journal of Botany 91, 1846-1862.

Submit Manuscript