Physicochemical analysis of fishes sold in wet market in Tuguegarao City, Cagayan, Philippines

Paper Details

Research Paper 08/06/2024
Views (127) Download (53)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Physicochemical analysis of fishes sold in wet market in Tuguegarao City, Cagayan, Philippines

Jinky Marie T. Chua, MA. Krischen Z. Austria, Gail Ann P. Pascual, Rosalia B. Cabalza, Jay Andrea Vea D. Israel
J. Bio. Env. Sci.24( 6), 46-51, June 2024.
Certificate: JBES 2024 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Fish is a vital component of a healthy diet, providing essential nutrients such as calcium, phosphorus, iron, zinc, iodine, magnesium, potassium, proteins, and vitamins. These nutrients contribute to lowering blood pressure and reducing the risk of heart attacks. In the Philippines, fish is the second staple food after rice, with significant per capita consumption driving an increase in fish farming. This study investigates the physicochemical properties of fish sold in Tuguegarao City’s wet markets, focusing on heavy metal contamination by lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd). Samples from common fish species-Bangus, Galunggong, Tilapia, and Hito—were collected and analyzed. The study found variations in fish length, weight, and pH, with Tilapia and Hito showing optimal freshness and quality. Heavy metal analysis revealed that all samples contained Pb and Cd levels below the permissible limits set by regulatory authorities, indicating they are safe for consumption. However, continuous monitoring is essential to ensure long-term safety and quality. The findings underscore the need for stringent handling practices and ongoing evaluation to safeguard public health against potential contaminants in fish products.

VIEWS 41

Chun HN, Kim B, Shin HS. 2014. Evaluation of a freshness indicator for quality of fish products during storage. Food Science Biotechnology 23, 1719-1725.

Do-Yeong, Kim B, Shin HS. 2023. Evaluation of a freshness indicator for quality of fish products during storage. Food Science Biotechnology 23, 1719-1725.

Elshehawy S, Gab-Alla A, Mutwally D. 2016. Quality attributes of the most common consumed fresh fish in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences 5(2), 85-94. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160502.11.

Fontoura NF, Jesus AS, Larre GG, Porto JR. 2010. Can weight/length relationship predict size at first maturity? A case study with two species of Characidae. Neotropical Ichthyology 8, 835-840.

Freitas J, Vaz-Pires P, Camara J. 2021. Quality Index Method for fish quality control: understanding the applications, the appointed limits and the upcoming trends. Trends in Food Science & Technology 111, 333-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.03.011.

Gram L, Huss HH. 1996. Microbiological spoilage of fish and fish products. International Journal of Food Microbiology 33, 121-137.

Hyldig G, Bremnen A, Martinsdottir E, Schelvis R. 2007. Quality Index Methods. In LML Nollet (Ed.), Handbook of Meat, Poultry and Seafood Quality. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 529-547.

Laureti C, Ferri G, Pennisi L. 2023. A Quality Index Method-based evaluation of sensory quality of red mullet (Mullus barbatus) and its shelf-life determination. Italian Journal of Food Safety 12(1), 10927. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2023.10927.

McGlynn S. 2016. Fish farming and the importance of pH. Retrieved from https://www.thefishsite.com

Yokogawa, n.d. Fish farming water quality monitoring: pH, DO, turbidity, etc. Retrieved from https://www.yokogawa.com