Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | December 1, 2016

VIEWS 2
| Download 2

Physiochemical attributes of early and late maturing peach cultivars during ripening

Muhammad Abbas Khan, Sajjad Khan, Fayyaz Ahmad, Naveed Ahmed, Imtiaz Ahmed, Fazal Yazdan, Noorullah Khan

Key Words:


Int. J. Biosci.9(6), 338-349, December 2016

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/9.6.338-349

Certification:

IJB 2016 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Peach is popular summer fruit crop being cultivated in temperate and subtropical region of the world. In Pakistan it is grown in Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Balochistan and Punjab but less attention has been paid to peach fruit because of high perishability and short postharvest life. Therefore, very little information is available about various changes in physico-chemical quality of peach during fruit ripening. In this regard an experiment was conducted to analyze the ripening behaviour of different peach cultivars during ripening by evaluating their physiological (weight loss, respiration rate, ethylene production), physical (fruit firmness) and biochemical viz. Total soluble solids (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), SSC:TA ratio, ascorbic acid (Vitamin C), total sugars, reducing sugars, non-reducing sugars, total carotenoids, antioxidant activity and total phenolic attributes. Fruits of five different peach cultivars were collected from District Swat and Mardan and were kept at ambient conditions in laboratory for five days and were evaluated for various physio-chemical attribute during ripening period. Results revealed that significant variations occurred in fruit quality of all cultivars during ripening at ambient conditions. At day-5 of ripening, cultivar ‘8-A’ exhibited maximum SSC; whereas, lowest SSC was measured in ‘Flordaking’. Maximum ascorbic acid content and total sugar were observed in ‘5-A’ fruit at ripening day 5; while, maximum total antioxidant, total phenolic content and total carotenoids content were noted in cultivar ‘Tex-6A-69’.  Maximum fruit firmness was recorded in cultivars ‘5-A’. Percent physiological loss in fruit weight was lower in cv. ‘8-A’ and maximum weight loss was recorded in ‘Tex-6A-69’ from day 1 to 5. Results revealed that cultivars ‘8-A’ and ‘Tex-6A-69’ had the best physico-chemical properties and better eating quality after 4 days ripening at ambient condition and these cultivars showed by grown and marketed for better consumption

VIEWS 2

Copyright © 2016
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Physiochemical attributes of early and late maturing peach cultivars during ripening

Akbudak B, Eris A. 2004. Physical and chemical changes in peaches and nectarines during the modified atmosphere storage. Food Control 15, 307–313.

Ascherio A, Rimm EBGiovannucci EL,  Coldiz GA, Rosner B, Willet WC,  Sacks F,  Sampers MJA.  1992. Prospective study of nutritional factors of hypertension among U.S men. Circulation 86, 1475-1484.

Bhakti P, Negri AS, Fedeli C, Morgutti S, Negrini N, Cocucci M, Espen L. 2011. Peach fruit ripening: A proteomic comparative analysis of the mesocarp of two cultivars with different flesh firmness at two ripening stages. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 46, 1211-1217.

Brovelli EA, Brecht JK, Sherman WB. 1998. Potential maturity indices and developmental aspects of melting-flesh and non-melting-flesh peach genotype for the fresh market. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 123(3), 438-444.

Cascales AI, Costell E, Romojaro F. 2005. Effects of the degree of maturity on the chemical composition, physical characteristics and sensory attributes of peach (Prunus persica L. cv. ‘Caterin’). Food Science and Technology International. 11, 345-352.

Esti M, Messia MC, Sinesio F, Nicotra A, Conte L, Notte EL, Palleschi G. 1997. Quality evaluation of peaches and nectarine by electrochemical and multivariate analysis. Food Chemistry 60, 659-666.

FAO. 2010. FAO Food and Nutrition Series.  Statistical database. http://faostat.fao.org

Giorgi M, Capocasa F, Scalzo J, Murri G, Battino M, Mezzetti B. 2005. The rootstock effect of on plant adaptability, production, fruit quality and nutrition in the peach cultivar ‘Suncrest’. Scientia Horticulture 107, 36-42.

Hajilou J, Fakhimrezaei S. 2011. Evaluation of fruit physicochemical properties in some peach cultivars. Research in Plant Biology 1, 16-21.

Hortwiz W. 1960. Official Method of Analysis: The  Association of Official Analytical Chemists (A.O.A.C.). 15th ed. Arlington., Washington D.C.

Hussain K. 2010. Postharvest fruit ripening and quality of different peaches (Prunus persica L.) cultivar before and after low temperature storage. M.Sc (Hons) Diss., Institute of Horticultural Sciences University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Infante R,  Contador L,  Rubio P, Aros D,  Pena-Neira A. 2011. Postharvest sensory and phenolic characterization of ‘Elegant Lady’ and ‘Carson’ peaches. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 71, 445-451.

Khan AD. 2012. Varieties of peach and their characteristics. (Available online with updates at: www.npfs-minfa.gov.pk/…/226).

Maria VL, Borsani J, Budde CO, Lauxmann MA, Lombardo VA, Murray R, Andreo CS, Drincovich MF. 2009. Biochemical and proteomic analysis of ‘Dixiland’ peach fruit (Prunus persica) upon heat treatment. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 4315-4333.of fruit, vegetables and ornamentals. CABI, Wallingford, UK.

Mateja C, Veberic R, Stampar F, and Hudina M. 2005. Evaluation of peach and nectarine fruit quality and correlations between sensory and chemical attributes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85, 2611.

Pakistan G. 2010. Agriculture Statistics of Pakistan 2009-10. Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Economic Wing, Islamabad.

Remorini D, Tavarini S, Degl E, Loreti F, Massai R, Guidi L. 2008. Effect of root stock and harvesting time on the nutritional quality of peel and flesh of nectarine fruits. Food Chemistry 110, 361-367.

Russel DM, Topp BL. 2002. Performance of Brazilian stone fruit varieties in temperate region of Australia. Acta Horticulture 592, 149-155.

Scalzo J, Politi A, Pellegrini N, Mezzetti B, Battino M. 2005. Plant genotype affects total antioxidant capacity and phenolics contents in fruit. Nutrition. 21:207-213.

Testoni A, Fibiani M, Conte L,  Nicotra A. 2006. ‘Ghiaccio-1’ peach qualitative traits on shelf life and cold storage. Acta Horticulture 16, 7-15.

Wills R, Mc Glasson B, Graham D, Joyce D. 2007. Physiology and biochemistry. p. 202 In:

Wills R, Mc Glasson BD, Graham D, Joyce D. (5th Ed.) An introduction to the physiology and handling.

SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT

Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background