Policy performance analysis of Aikbual village regulation number 1 2014 concerning biodiversity management to supporting social forestry in West Nusa Tenggara

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2019
Views (610)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Policy performance analysis of Aikbual village regulation number 1 2014 concerning biodiversity management to supporting social forestry in West Nusa Tenggara

Andi Chairil Ichsan, Markum, Rato Firdaus Silamon
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 14(2), 111-116, February 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The establishment of Village Regulation Number 1 Year 2014 concerning biodiversity management in Aik Bual village was intended to guide the community forest management in order to be able to maintain the balance of ecosystem and increase the public awareness in environmental conservation efforts. However, since the regulation was implemented, there is no single information that provides an overview on the impact of its implementation. Thus, the purpose of the research is directed to measure the policy performance by referring to the six criteria developed by Dunn (2003). The research used evaluative policy approach with the scope of retrospective analysis (ex post). The data was collected using several instruments in the form of in-depth interview, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), and literature study. The result indicates that the policy performance is in “good” category, with value of 2.39. Nevertheless, the research also identified some indicators need to be strengthened for optimizing the policy performance. Some of them pertain to the reinforcement of information system and the availability of policy activity data.

Bungin B. 2003. Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta (ID): Radja Grafindo Persada.

Chambers R. 1992. Rural Appraissal, Rapid, Relaxed and Partisipatory. Inst. Dev. Studies, Univ. of Sussex, England.

Desa Aik Bual. 2014. Peraturan Desa Nomor 1 tahun 2014 tentang pengelolaan keanekaragaman hayati di desa Aik Bual.

Desa Aik Bual. 2017. Laporan Tahunan Desa Aik Bual.

Dunn, William N. 2003. Analisa Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: PT. Prasetia Widia Pratama.

Forest Watch Indonesia [FWI]. 2014. Panduan penilaian kinerja pembangunan KPH dengan Menggunakan Kriteria dan Indikator FWI 1.0. Bogor: Forest Watch Indonesia.

Forest Watch Indonesia [FWI]. 2014. Potret Keadaan Hutan Indonesia Periode 2009-2013. Bogor: Forest Watch Indonesia.

Governance Forest Initiative Indonesia [GFI]. 2013. Potret Pelaksanaan Tata Kelola Hutan: Sebuah Studi Mendalam Di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah dan Nusa Tenggara Barat. Bogor: Forest Watch Indonesia.

Ichsan AC. 2017. Kelembagaan Model Desa Konservasi di Taman Nasional Gunung Rinjani Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat (Doctoral dissertation, IPB (Bogor Agricultural University)).

Kasper W, Streit ME. 1998. Institutional Economics, Social Order and Policy. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham, UK. and Northampton, MA. USA.

Mulyana D. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

North D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nugroho B. 2013. Reformasikelembagaan dan tata pemerintahan. Faktor Pemungkin Menuju Tata Kelola Kehutanan Yang Baik. In: Kartodihardjo H, editor. Kembali Ke Jalan Lurus. Kritik Penggunaan Ilmu dan Praktek Kehutanan Indonesia. Yogyakarta (ID): Nailil Printika.

Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Common: The Evolution of Institution for Collective action. New New York (US): Cambridge University Press.

Sevilla CG. 1993 Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Penerjemah; Alimudin Tuwu dan Alam Syah. Jakarta: UI Press.

Situmorang, Abdul Wahib. 2013. Indeks Tata Kelola Hutan, lahan, dan REDD+ 2012 Di Indonesia. Jakarta : UNDP Indonesia.

Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kualitatf, Kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung (ID): Alfabeta.

Wiyono. 2006. Kehutanan Multipihak Langkah Menuju Perubahan. Bogor: Center For International Forestry Research.

Related Articles

Overemphasis on blue carbon leads to biodiversity loss: A case study on subsidence coastal wetlands in southwest Taiwan

Yih-Tsong Ueng, Feng-Jiau Lin, Ya-Wen Hsiao, Perng-Sheng Chen, Hsiao-Yun Chang, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 46-57, August 2025.

An assessment of the current scenario of biodiversity in Ghana in the context of climate change

Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan, Francis Tuuli Gamuo Junior, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 35-45, August 2025.

Entomofaunal diversity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] cultivation systems within the cotton-growing zone of central Benin

Lionel Zadji, Roland Bocco, Mohamed Yaya, Abdou-Abou-Bakari Lassissi, Raphael Okounou Toko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 21-34, August 2025.

Biogenic fabrication of biochar-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles using Miscanthus sinensis for oxytetracycline removal and toxicological assessment

Meenakshi Sundaram Sharmila, Gurusamy, Annadurai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 10-20, August 2025.

Bacteriological analysis of selected fishes sold in wet markets in Tuguegarao city, Cagayan, Philippines

Lara Melissa G. Luis, Jay Andrea Vea D. Israel, Dorina D. Sabatin, Gina M. Zamora, Julius T. Capili, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 1-9, August 2025.

Effect of different substrates on the domestication of Saba comorensis (Bojer) Pichon (Apocynaceae), a spontaneous plant used in agroforestry system

Claude Bernard Aké*1, Bi Irié Honoré Ta2, Adjo Annie Yvette Assalé1, Yao Sadaiou Sabas Barima1, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(1), 90-96, July 2025.

Determinants of tree resource consumption around Mont Sangbé national park in western Côte d’Ivoire

Kouamé Christophe Koffi, Serge Cherry Piba, Kouakou Hilaire Bohoussou, Naomie Ouffoue, Alex Beda, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(1), 71-81, July 2025.