home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Prevalence of pathologies encountered in dairy cattle in Côte d’Ivoire

Paper Details

Research Paper 11/03/2025
Views (8) Download (2)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Prevalence of pathologies encountered in dairy cattle in Côte d’Ivoire

Kéita Abdoulaye, Traoré Beh, Yapi Jean Noel, Diabaté Nadiara
Int. J. Biosci.26( 3), 147-153, March 2025.
Certificate: IJB 2025 [Generate Certificate]
Key: Côte d’IvoireDairy cowGenetic improvementPathologyPrevalence

Abstract

On dairy farms, disease is one of the main causes of poor performance, given its biological and economic consequences. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of pathologies encountered in mixed-breed dairy cows in Côte d’Ivoire. The study involved 132 crossbred cows, including 104 Montbeliarde crossbreds and 28 Holstein crossbreds. For three years, the herd was inspected daily to identify and record cases of pathology. The overall prevalence of pathologies, as well as the effect of breed, generation, production level and season, was determined using the Chi-square test of independence. A total of 448 symptoms were recorded and grouped into seven (7) pathologies. These were mastitis, lameness, metritis, dystocia, placental retention, trypanosomiasis and “other pathologies”, the respective proportions of which were: 50.54%, 18.08%, 14.96%, 4.02%, 7.14%, 0.45% and 4.91%. Montbeliarde cows of all generations were significantly susceptible to pathologies. First-generation cows were significantly more affected by pathologies than second-generation cows. In terms of milk production, whatever the breed, cows with a production of over 15 liters were significantly affected by mastitis and lameness, while cows with a production of over 15 liters were significantly affected by pathologies.

Cover PDF

Bakayoko VK. 2016. Revue des filières bétail/viande & lait et des politiques qui les influencent en Côte d’Ivoire. Abidjan: FAO et CEDEAO, 114p.

Barnouin J, Fayet JC, Brochart M, Bouvier M, Paccard P. 1983. Enquête éco-pathologique continue: 1. Hiérarchie de la pathologie observée en élevage bovin laitier. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 14(3), 247.

Barnouin J, Karaman Z. 1986. Enquête éco-pathologique continue: 9. Influence du niveau de production sur la pathologie de la vache laitière. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 17(3), 331–346.

Barnouin J. 1983. Enquête éco-pathologique continue en élevages-observatoires chez les ruminants: objectifs et stratégie. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 11, 341–350.

Brochart M, Fayet JC. 1981. Milieu et pathologie podale des vaches laitières. In: Milieu, pathologie et prévention chez les ruminants, INRA Publ., 39–44.

Claxton J, Leperre P. 1991. Parasite burdens and host susceptibility of Zebu and N’Dama cattle in village herds in Gambia. Veterinary Parasitology 40(3–4), 293–304.

Dohoo I, Martin SW, McMillan I, Kennedy BW. 1984. Disease, production and culling in Holstein-Friesian cows. 2. Age, season and sire effects. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 48(2), 655–670.

Faye B, Brochart M. 1986. Enquête éco-pathologique continue: 7. Approche épidémiologique des mammites post-partum chez la vache laitière: étude descriptive et typologie des élevages. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 17(3), 297–311.

Faye B, Fayet JC, Genest M, Chassagne M. 1986. Enquête éco-pathologique continue: 10. Variations des fréquences pathologiques en élevages bovin laitier en fonction de la saison, de l’année et du numéro de lactation.

Faye B, Landais E, Coulon JB, Lescourret F. 1994. Incidence des troubles sanitaires chez la vache laitière: bilan de 20 années d’observation dans 3 troupeaux expérimentaux. INRA Productions Animales 7(3), 191–206. https://hal.science/hal-00896086

Landais E, Coulon JB, Garel JP, Hoden A. 1989. Caractérisation de la pathologie de la vache laitière à l’échelle de la lactation. Principaux facteurs de variation et typologie des profils pathologiques de lactation. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 20, 277–294.

Mattioli RC, Cassama M, Kora S. 1992. A comparative study of gastrointestinal nematode egg output in N’Dama, Zebu and N’Dama × Zebu crossbred cattle. Parasitologia 34(1–3), 109–113.

Mattioli RC, Pandey VS, Murray M, Fitzpatrick JC. 2000. Immunogenetic influences on tick resistances in African cattle with particular reference to trypanotolerant N’Dama (Bos taurus) and trypanosusceptible Gobra Zebu (Bos indicus) cattle. Acta Tropica 75(3), 263–272.

Poivey JP. 2007. Définition d’un schéma d’amélioration génétique des bovins: Rapport de mission. Montpellier: CIRAD, 64p.

Rowlands GJ, Russel AM, Williams A. 1983. Effects of season, herd size, management system and veterinary practice on the lameness incidence in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record 111, 155–160.

Sokouri DP, Yapi-Gnaoré CV, N’Guetta ASP, Loukou NE, Kouao BJ, Touré G, Sangaré A, Kouassi A. 2009. Utilisation et gestion des races taurines locales sous la pression des croisements avec les zébus dans les régions Centre et Nord de la Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 5, 456–465.

Submit Manuscript