Production status of dairy cattle farms in the Province of Isabela, Philippines

Paper Details

Research Paper 02/07/2025
Views (189)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Production status of dairy cattle farms in the Province of Isabela, Philippines

Sergio S. G. Galamgam, Jonathan N. Nayga, Aubrey Joy M. Balbin, Mark Joker L. Marcos
Int. J. Biosci. 27(1), 21-28, July 2025.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2025; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The Philippine dairy sector heavily rely on importing milk and dairy animals; thus, the government continuously strengthen the sector by establishing new dairy farms and by importing dairy animals. The Province of Isabela, Philippines, agriculture-based community has invested in dairy production. In order to evaluate the current production status of the dairy farms, the current production performance of the five (5) selected dairy cattle farms was conducted. To preserve confidentiality, codes are assigned to each farm. Structured surveys were conducted with dairy cattle farmers to collect quantitative data on milk yield, cattle health, nutrition, and management practices. The results of the study revealed that 100% of the farms belonged to commercial-scale of production. The total inventory was dairy cattle is recorded at 933 heads of livestock, on breeding, 80% of the farms utilized artificial insemination following continuous breeding. On feeds and feeding, 60% of the farms relied on natural vegetations as sources of grasses. Aside from this, 80% of the farms utilized improved species of grasses, 30% fed the animals with shrubs and 20% of the farm utilized recommended legumes.  It is noted that only 20% of the studied areas fed the animals with concentrates; while other farms also provided UMMB (30%) and molasses (30%), and vitamin-mineral administration (40%). Forage processing or silage production is also practiced. It is noted that 60% produced corn silage; while 80% utilized Napier grass. On production system, 60% follow confinement production management. All farms reported pneumonia as major caused of mortality. Lastly, all farms kept records on farm production but the data was not analyzed. Because of these inadequate production practices, a significant difference was observed on milk yield of the animals raised in different farms, with the highest yield recorded from Farm 01 at 7.50 L; while the least was noted from Farm 04 at 4.79 L. Based on the results presented, the management is the farm is inadequate which needs immediate interventions to improve the overall status of the dairy animals.

Abera D. 2017. Management of dystocia cases in the cattle: A review. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility 8, 1-9.

Bargo F, Muller L, Delahoy J, Cassidy T. 2002. Performance of high producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2948-2963.

Biesheuvel MM, VAn Schaik G, Meertens NM, Peperkamp NH, Van Engelen E, Van Garderen E. 2021. Emergence of fatal Mannheimia haemolytica infections in cattle in the Netherlands. Veterinary Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2020.105576

Brennan ML, Christley RN. 2013. Cattle producers perceptions of biosecurity. BMC Veterinary Research 9, 71-79.

Brito LF, Douhard F, Oliveira HR, Arnal M, Schinckel AP, Baes CF, Miglior F. 2021. Review: Genetic selection of high-yielding dairy cattle toward sustainable farming systems in a rapidly changing world. Animal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100292

Britt JH, Cushman RA, Dechow CD, Dobson H, Humblot P, Hutjens MF, Jones GA, Ruegg PS, Sheldon IM, Stevenson JS. 2018. Invited review: Learning from the future- A vision for dairy farms and cows in 2067. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-14025

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States. 2013. Milk and Dairy Products in Human Nutrition. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/5067e4f2-53f8-5c9a-b709- c5db17d55c20/

FAO. 2015. The impact of natural hazards and disasters on agriculture and food security and nutrition security 1-54.

Geleta T. 2013. Effect of supplementing grazing Arsi-Bale sheep with molasses-urea feed block on weight gain and economic return under farmers management condition. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology 7(10), 125-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/jcab11.030

Guzman E, Taylor G. 2015. Immunology of bovine respiratory syncytial virus in calves. Molecular Immunology, 48-56.

Jeyabalan V. 2010. Individual cow recording and analysis system for small scale dairy farmers in Malaysia. International Journal of Computer Applications, 33-38.

Rasmussen P, Barkema HW, Osei PP, Taylor J, Shaw, AP, Conrady B, Rushton J, Torgerson PR. 2024. Global losses due to dairy cattle diseases: A comorbidity-adjusted economic analysis. Journal of Dairy Science, 6945-6970. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-24626

Upadhyay N, Tiwari MR, Pandey LN, Karki TB, Acharya R, Gairhe S, Acharya Y. 2020. Economic analysis of urea molasses mineral block (UMMB) feeding to lactating cattle in Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020: 210-218. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20203272776

Lucy MC.  2007. Fertility in high-producing dairy cows: reasons for decline and corrective strategies for sustainable improvement. Society of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement, 237-254. PMID: 17491151. http://dx.doi.org/10.5661/rdr-vi-237.

Mesgaran D, Amini J, Paktinat M. 2013. In vitro usage of various non-organic compounds to subdue acidogenic value and enhance the fermentation of alfalfa hay-based diets by mixed rumen microbiota. International Journal of Livestock Production, 165-171.

Related Articles

Implications of aberrant glycosylation on age-related disease progression

Tahmid Ahmad Patwary, Mukramur Rahman, Md. Nafis Fuad Prottoy, Sayad Md. Didarul Alam, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 176-188, August 2025.

Design and development of solar powered water sprayer: A green technology innovation

Lorenzo V. Sugod, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 159-175, August 2025.

Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and social awareness regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection in the kyrgyz population in the post-pandemic period

Mirza Masroor Ali Beg, Haider Ali, Yahya Nur Ahmed, Yavuz Gunduz, Hafsa Develi, Tilekeeva UM, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 151-158, August 2025.

Tumor suppressing ability of myrtenal in DMBA-induced rat mammary cancer: A biochemical and histopathological evaluation

Manoharan Pethanasamy, Shanmugam M. Sivasankaran, Saravanan Surya, Raju Kowsalya, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 141-150, August 2025.

Assessing tree diversity in cashew plantations: Environmental and agronomic determinants in buffer zones of Mont Sangbé National Park, western Côte d’Ivoire

Kouamé Christophe Koffi, Kouakou Hilaire Bohoussou, Serge Cherry Piba, Naomie Ouffoue, Sylvestre Gagbe, Alex Beda, Adama Tondossama, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 122-133, August 2025.

Anthelmintic potential of powdered papaya seed Carica papaya in varying levels against Ascaridia galli in broiler chicken

Roniemay P. Sayson, Mylene G. Millapez, Zandro O. Perez, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 114-121, August 2025.

Valorization of fish scale waste for the synthesis of functional gelatin-based biopolymers

N. Natarajan Arun Nagendran, B. Balakrishnan Rajalakshmi, C. Chellapandi Balachandran, Jayabalan Viji, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 102-113, August 2025.