home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Productivity of grafted tomato using different sources of eggplant rootstock

Paper Details

Research Paper 12/02/2023
Views (1718) Download (386)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Productivity of grafted tomato using different sources of eggplant rootstock

M. Ticman JR. Cipriano, Joy B. Ticman Princess
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.22( 2), 15-20, February 2023.
Certificate: IJAAR 2023 [Generate Certificate]
Key: EggplantGraftedProductivityRootstockScionTomatoYield

Abstract

A study of the growth and productivity of tomato using different rootstock of eggplant was conducted at the experimental area of the College of Agriculture, Isabela state University, Echague Isabela. The study was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design. The treatments were as follows: T1– Control (Non-grafted), T2- Grafted onto a Rootstock of wild eggplant, T3– Grafted onto a Rootstock of Hybrid Eggplant (Casino F1), and T4– Grafted onto a Rootstock of Open Pollinated Variety (OPV) Eggplant (Aurora Green). The height of the plants at 20, 40, 60, and 80 days after transplanting were not influenced by the different eggplant rootstocks. The grafted plants regardless of rootstock obtained the highest number of branches and marketable fruits per plant. Significantly bigger fruit diameter, heavier marketable fruits per plant and per sampling area. The non- grafted plants obtained the lowest values in all the parameters gathered. The computed yield of tomato per 1,00 square meters using different sources of eggplant showed that the rootstock of wild eggplant obtained the heaviest fruit yield with 10.82 tons as well as the highest return on investment with 432.43 present.

VIEWS 757
Cover PDF

Aganon CP, Mateo LG, Cacho D, Bala A, Aganon TM. 2002. Enhancing off-season production through grafted tomato technology. Philippine Journal of Crop Science 27(2), 3-9.

Black LL, Wu DL, Wang JF, Kalb T, Abbass D, Chen JH. 2003. Grafting tomatoes for production in the hot-wet season. Asian Vegetable Research & Development Center. AVRDC Publication 3, 551.

Bletsos F, Thanassoulopoulos C, Roupakias D. 2003. Effect of grafting on growth, yield, and Verticillium wilt of eggplant. Hort Science 38(2), 183-186.

Hartman HT, Kester DE. 1975. Plant Propagation Principles and Practices. 3 rd Prentice-Hall. Inc. New Jersey pp. 211, 270.

Kubota, Chieri, Michael A McClure, Nancy Kokalis-Burelle, Michael G Bausher, Erin N Rosskopf. 2008. “Vegetable grafting: History, use, and current technology status in North America.” HortScience 43(6), 1664-1669.

Makam SN, Peer WA, Blakeslee JJ, Murphy AS. 2005. Cultural conditions contributing to vine decline syndrome in watermelon. Hort Science 40(3), 597-601.

Paplomatas EJ, Elena K, Tsagkarakou A, Perdikaris A. 2000. Control of Verticillium wilt of tomato and cucurbits through grafting of commercial varieties on resistant rootstocks. In II Balkan Symposium on Vegetables and Potatoes 579, 445-449).

Passam HC, Karapanos IC, Bebeli PJ, Savvas D. 2007. A review of recent research on tomato nutrition, breeding and post-harvest technology with reference to fruit quality. The European Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 1(1), 1-21.

Submit Manuscript