Provisioning Services of Forest Ecosystem: A Case Study of Southern Achanakmar Tiger Reserve, Central India

Paper Details

Research Paper 03/10/2022
Views (1035) Download (124)

Provisioning Services of Forest Ecosystem: A Case Study of Southern Achanakmar Tiger Reserve, Central India

Damini Sharma, Gunjan Patil, Preety Shah
Int. J. Biosci.21( 4), 1-10, October 2022.
Certificate: IJB 2022 [Generate Certificate]


The research was carried out in one of the protected areas, the Southern Achanakmar Tiger Reserve in India’s Chhattisgarh state aims to estimate the provisioning services of the forest inhabitants in buffer and fringe communities. A self-administered structured questionnaire was used as a tool, and a multistage random sampling method was adopted for the survey. The outcomes of the study found that the total economic value of NTFPs (non-timber forest produces) and fuel wood have more value than the benefits derived from agriculture in both buffer and fringe areas. Additionally, the economic value of the NTFPs collection per household per day ranges from 0.26-1.34 USD for 5-7 notable species near the village area and the average computed fuel wood per household per day was assessed as 5.34 (mean) ± 1.43(SD) kg. The study reveals the consumption pattern, economic importance of the forest, and the favorable conditions that encourage people to establish near the area.


Acharya RP, Maraseni T, Cockfield G. 2019. The global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation : An analysis of publications. Ecosystem Services 39, 1-11.

Agrawal A, Chhatre A. 2011.  Against mono-consequentialism: multiple outcomes and their drivers in social-ecological systems. Global Environmental Change 21(1), 1–3.

Aslaksen I, Nybø S, Framstad E, Garnåsjordet PA, Skarpaas O. 2015. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: the Nature Index for Norwa. Ecosystem Services 12, 108–116.

Bhatt BP, Todaria NP. 1992. Fuelwood characteristics of some Indian mountain species. Forest Ecology and Management 4367, 3-366.

Brockerhoff EG, Barbaro L, Castagneyrol B, Forrester DI, Gardiner B,  Gonz´alez- Olabarria JR, Lyver PO, Meurisse N, Oxbrough A, Taki H. 2017. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodiversity and Conservation 26, 3005–3035.

Census of India. 1971. District Census Handbook Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Series 10.

Census of India. 2011. District Census Handbook Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Series 23.

Chandra K, Boaz A. 2018. Fauna of Achanakmar Tiger Reserve, Chhattisgarh. Report Published by the State Forest Research and Training Institute, Forest Department Chhattisgarh & Zoological Survey of India, p 1-486. Accessed January 2018.

Daily G, Alexander S, Ehrlich P, Goulder L, Lubchenco J, Matson PA, Mooney H, Postel S, Schneider SH, Tilman D. 1997. Ecosystem Services: Benefits Supplied to Human Societies by Natural Ecosystems. Ecology 1, 1-18.

De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management, and decision making, Ecological Complexity 7(3), 260-272.

Dranove D. 2012. Practical Regression: Building your Model- What Variable to Include in: University. N. (Ed.). Kellogg Case Publishing, USA. file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/KTN%20Regression%20Basics.pdf

Equations. 2010. Land Rights Violations at Achanakmar Wildlife Sanctuary, Chhattisgarh. Fact Finding Report by Baiga Mahapanchayat, Nadi Ghati Morcha and EQUATIONS. Accessed 31 December 2010.

India State of Forest Report. 2019. Forest Survey of India. Ministry of  Environment Forest and Climate Change 1 Ed.16. Welcome To Forest Survey of India (

Ganguli JL, Ganguli RN, Shukla BC. 2015. Pest Scenario of Agro-Forestry Trees in Plantations of Chhattisgarh. Paper presented in Workshop on research needs for Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve, Tropical Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur.

Haines-Yong R, Potschin M. 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) Version 4: Response to Consultation (Report to the European Environment Agency). Centre for Environmental Management, University of Nottingham, 2012, [online January 2013]

Jain RK. 1993. Fuelwood characteristics of some tropical trees of India. Biomass and Bioenergy 4(6), 461-464.

Joppa LN, Loarie SR. Pimm SL. 2008. On the protection of “protected areas”. PNAS 105(18), 6673-6678.

Joshi KC, Negi MS, Tiple. 2010. Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve. Biosphere Reserve Information Series (BRIS) 2, 1-158.

Kibria ASMG, Costan za R, Groves C, Behie AM. 2018. The interactions between livelihood capitals and access of local communities to the forest provisioning services of the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh. Ecosystem Services 32, 41-49.

Mohapatra SD. 2012. Impact of Resource Dependence By Local Communities on Similipal Tiger Reserve. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Pondicherry University, Pondicherry, India.

Ninan KN, Kontoleon A. 2016. Valuing forest ecosystem services and disservices – A case study of a protected area in India. Ecosystem Services 20, 1–14.

Palta A, Aggarwal A. 2016. Value addition of traditional recipes of Chhattisgarh: The rice bowl of India. International Journal of Home Science 2(1), 65-68.

Redfearn DD, Bidwell TG. 2017. Stocking Rate: The Key to Successful Livestock Production. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, [online February 2017].

Sarkar PK, Sinha A, Das A, Dhakar MK, Shinde R, Chakrabarti A, Yadav VK, Bhatt BP. 2021. Kusum (Schleichera oleosa (Lour.) Oken): A potential multipurpose tree species, its future perspective and the way forward. Acta Ecologica Sinica (in press).

Sharma D, Chandrakar K, Verma DK, Yadav KC. 2014. A Study on Consumption Trends of Fuel Wood & their Impact on Forest in Kanker Forest Division of Chhattisgarh State (India). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 4(1), 1-3.

Strand J, Soares-Filho B, Costa MH, Oliveira U, Ribeiro SC, Pires GF, Oliveira A, Rajão R,  May P, Hoff R, Siamäki J, Motta RSD, Toman M. 2018. Spatially explicit valuation of the Brazilian Amazon Forest’s Ecosystem Services. Nature Sustainability 1, 657–664.