Qualities of monogerm male-sterile sugar beet lines

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/04/2016
Views (931)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Qualities of monogerm male-sterile sugar beet lines

Georgi Kikindonov
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 8(4), 81-86, April 2016.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The majority of the commercial varieties of sugar beet in Europe are hybrids, based on monogerm diploid male-sterile females and multigerm diploid and tetraploid pollinators. The aim of the present study is by testing the basic biological qualities of recently created male-sterile sugar beet lines (male sterility, monogermity, seeds germination), and the combination of productivity and technological qualities, to make an assessment of their breeding value. The diploid lines have high male sterility, combined with high laboratory seeds germination and practically full monogermity. The tetraploid lines show significantly lower levels of male sterility and germination. The diploid monogerm lines MS 0819, MS 0922 and MS 0926 combine good biological characteristics with high own productivity and technological indices. The tetraploid lines tested have better technological qualities, and the best combination of good biological and economic qualities is manifested by MS 142. The high heterosis effect levels registered for the white sugar yield from the triploid hybrids of the tested lines with multigerm pollinators are indication for the very good combining ability of the monogerm lines and a proof for their high breeding value.

Akeson KR. 1980. Sugar beet fruit germination and emergence under moisture and temperature stress. Crop Science 20, 134-139. Antonov I. 1997. Basic trends in the breeding of n monogerm male sterile lines of sugar beet. Plant science 34 (7-8), 24-27.

Antonov I, Zakhariev A. 1994. State and problems of the sugar beet breeding in Bulgaria. Plant Science 31(3-4), 97-101.

Biancardi E, McGrath JM, Panella LW, Lewellen RT, Stevanato P. 2010. Sugar Beet. In: Bradshow JE (Ed.) Root and Tuber Crops. Handbook of Plant Breeding, New York, Springer 7, 173-219.

Bosemark NO. 2006. Genetics and Breeding In: Draycott AP. (Ed.) Sugar Beet, Oxford UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 50-88.

Jansen R, Stibbe C. 2007. Impact of plant breeding on the profitability of sugar beet production. International Sugar Journal 109, 227-233.

Kawakatsu M, Tanaka M. 1999. Investigation of Qualities of Sugar Beet Seed 5. Effects of multigerm pollen parent on the qualities of monogerm hybrid seed. Proceedings of Japanese Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 41, 103-109.

Kikindonov Tz, Kikindonov G, 2004. Individual selection of new male-sterile lines of sugar beet. Field Crops Studies 1 (2), 255-259.

Lidanski T. 1988. Statistical Methods in Biology and Agriculture. Zemizdat, Sofia 231-275.

Rostel HJ. 1981. Ergebnisse und problem der hybridzuchtung bei Zuckerruben unter beruck-sightigung der genomdosis. Ber.Acad.Wiss. DDR, Berlin 191, 79-84.

Steinrucken G. 2005. Prospects in sugar beet breeding. In: Genetics and Breeding of Sugar Beet, Einfield, Science Publishers Inc. 234.

Uchkunov I, Uchkunova K. 2012. Productivity of monogerm hybrids of sugar beet with the use of multigerm pollinators. Plant Science 49 (5), 29-32.

Uchkunova K. 2006. Use of multigerm pollinators with valuable combinative qualities in creation of monogerm sugar beet hybrids. Field Crops Studies 3 (1), 70-72.

Related Articles

Phenotypic and molecular screening for resistance in elite cassava clones against cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) in Kenya

Geofrey S. Ombiro, George N. Mose, Elijah M. Ateka, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(6), 1-8, December 2025.

Influence of biochar derived from agricultural waste on soil properties and productivity of carrots (Daucus carota)

Jr. Cipriano M. Ticman*, Princess Joy B. Ticman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(5), 46-52, November 2025.

Understanding the determinants of pepper production (Capsicum annuum L.) in Niger: Insights into local agricultural dynamics

Halimatou Ousseini Maiga, Oumarou Souleymane, Illiassou Mossi Maiga, Adam Toudou, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(5), 37-45, November 2025.

Gamma radiation-induced variation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) mutants for yield and agronomic traits

Amanullah Maree, Munaiza Baloch, Shah Nawaz Mari, Mahboob Ali Sial, Khalil Ahmed Laghari, Jay Kumar Sootaher, Muhammad Jamshaid, Attaullah, Saba Muneer, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(5), 23-36, November 2025.

Farmers perception of the genetic diversity of peppers (Capsicum annuum) in Niger: Between tradition and innovation

Halimatou Ousseini Maiga, Oumarou Souleymane, Illiassou Mossi Maiga, Adam Toudou, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(5), 12-22, November 2025.

Development and reproductive performance of Amblyseius eharai (Acari: Phytoseiidae) fed on different stages of Tyrophagus sp. as a potential factitious prey for mass rearing

Ho L. Quyen, Nguyen T. Thuy, Le T. A. Hong, Bach N. Minh, Le P. Chien, Phan V. Dan, Nguyen D. H. Vu, Tran G. Thinh, Tran C. Tu, Trinh V. Nga, Nguyen T. P. Thao, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(5), 1-11, November 2025.

Effects of tillage and fertilizers on soil and yield characteristics of brri dhan97 rice

Md Khayrul Islam Bashar, Zahidul Islam, Md Ekhlasur Rahman, Md Kayes Mahmud, Md Abul Bashar, Md Zulfiqar, Md Tariqul Islam, Md Musa Mondal, Amit Kumar, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(4), 11-20, October 2025.

Population parameters and exploitation levels of Synodontis membranaceus, a commercially valuable species in the Bagoué River in northern Ivory Coast

Kouyaté Kassoum, Cissé Mamadou, Ahoutou Konan Eric, N’douba Valentin, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(4), 1-10, October 2025.