Reduction estimates of CO2 emission at the relocation site of typhoon victims: an alternate to climate resiliency

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/11/2018
Views (317) Download (94)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Reduction estimates of CO2 emission at the relocation site of typhoon victims: an alternate to climate resiliency

Mary Jean D. Salvaña, Alma Negre Abug
J. Bio. Env. Sci.13( 5), 83-90, November 2018.
Certificate: JBES 2018 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The increasing amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that causes global warming is one of the major forces that challenges every country to search for alternative energy sources. The study attempted to quantify the carbon account reduction of using an alternative energy source, Solar Photovoltaic, SPV panel at the relocation site of Sendong Typhoon victims at the elevated part of Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines and to determine how it can provide residents resiliency to global warming. A total of 30 households were purposively selected to answer the survey questionnaire in terms of the family income, the components of solar system installed and its estimated costs as well as the generated electricity in kW/hr., the payback time and the avoided carbon dioxide, CO2 emission. Results showed56.7% of the households were using basic SPV 50-wattage panel that supplies energy for lighting, battery charging and operating mini electric fans, but the energy generated per household varied depending on the SPV panel used. The lower the energy, the longer the payback period, generating an average of 6.12 kW-hr per month. Quantitatively, the CO2 emission that can be avoided is approximately 0.861 metric ton per year for households using the 50-watts. Moreover, an estimate of 2.583 metric ton/year of CO2 emission can be avoided for a-30 household respondents ranging from 50-200 watts usage of SPV panels. In general, the adoption of a household to spend for a panel to be used for energy generation can be an alternative measure for climate resiliency.

VIEWS 16

Agrawal A. 2013. Solar Energy for Domestic Drinking Water: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Chem Tech Research 5(2), 811-814.

Arif M. 2013. Residential Solar Panels and Their Impact on the Reduction of Carbon Emissions. Springer 2013.

Casis RJ. July 2008. The Climate Change Crisis: Global Legal Framework, Policy Initiatives and the Philippine Response, Philippine Climate Change Policy: Mitigation and Adaptation Measures. Experts Dialogue, University of the Philippines Law Center, U.P. Diliman.

Deb A, Bhuiyan MAM, Nasir A. 2013.Prospects of Solar Energy in Bangladesh. Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering 4(5), (Jan. – Feb. 2013), 46-57.

De Vries BJM, Van Vuuren DP, Hoogwijk MM. 2007. Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach. Energy Policy 35, 2590-2610.

Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Electricity Reductions.

ESRI. 2008. Ignoring Rural Realities: The Implications of Carbon Tax for Rural Ireland.

Philippine Atmospheric and Geophysical Sciences Administration (PAG-ASA). 2007.    Meteorological Reports from 1970-2007.

Philippines Atmospheric and Geophysical Sciences Administration (PAG-ASA). 2013. Typhoon “Yolanda”. Philippine Atmospheric Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration website. www.pagasa.gov.ph

Pearce J. 2002. Photovoltaics- A Path Sustainable Futures. Futures 34, 663-674.

NDRRMC. 2014. NDRRMC Update SitRep No. 87 Effects of Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan). Technical Report, National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council.

Sasikumar N, Jayasubramaniam P. 2013. Solar  Energy System in India. Journal of Business and Management 7(1), (Jan. – Feb. 2013), p 61-68.

Schaeffer J. 2013. Solar Living Source Book 12th Edition: Your Complete Guide to Renewable Energy Technologies and Sustainable Living, New Society Publishers, BC V0R 1X0 Canada.