Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | December 1, 2018

VIEWS 1
| Download 1

Removed by Author Request

Farheen Bhatti, Shaheen Asad, Muhammad Asif

Key Words:


J. Bio. Env. Sci.13(6), 89-98, December 2018

Certification:

JBES 2018 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Weediness potential of AVP1 GM sugarcane

VIEWS 1

Copyright © 2018
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Removed by Author Request

Bonnett G, Berding N, Morgan T, Fitzgerald P. 2007. Implementation of genetically modified sugarcane-the need for a better understanding of sexual reproduction. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 29, 258-266.

Bonnett G, Nowak E, Olivares-Villegas J, Berding N, Morgan T, Aitken KS. 2008. Identifying the risks of transgene escape from sugarcane crops to related species, with particular reference to Saccharum spontaneum in Australia. Tropical Plant Biology 1, 58-71.

Bonnett G, Olivares-Villegas J, Berding N, Morgan T. 2011. Sugarcane sexual reproduction in a commercial environment: research to underpin regulatory decisions for genetically modified sugarcane. International Sugar Journal 113, 214.

Castro-Nava S, Huerta AJ, Plácido-de la Cruz JM, Mireles-Rodríguez E. 2016. Leaf growth and canopy development of three sugarcane genotypes under high temperature rainfed conditions in Northeastern Mexico. International Journal of Agronomy 2016, 1-7.

Cheavegatti-Gianotto A, de Abreu HMC, Arruda P, Bespalhok Filho JC, Burnquist WL, Creste S, di Ciero L, Ferro JA, de Oliveira Figueira AV, de Sousa Filgueiras T. 2011. Sugarcane (Saccharum X officinarum): a reference study for the regulation of genetically modified cultivars in Brazil. Tropical Plant Biology 4, 62-89.

da Silva VSG, de Oliveira MW, Oliveira TBA, Mantovanelli BC, da Silva AC, icero, Soares ANR, Clemente PRA. 2017. Leaf area of sugarcane varieties and their correlation with biomass productivity in three cycles. African Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 459-466.

Davison J, Ammann K. 2017. New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology. GM Crops & Food 8, 13-34.

Eastick R. 2002. Evaluation of the potential weediness of transgenic cotton in northern Australia: CSIRO Plant Industry.

Eastick RJ, Hearnden MN. 2006. Potential for weediness of Bt cotton in northern Australia. Weed Science 54, 1142-1151.

Hanin M, Ebel C, Ngom M, Laplaze L, Masmoudi K. 2016. New insights on plant salt tolerance mechanisms and their potential use for breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science 7.

Hermann E, Câmara G. 1999. Um método simples para estimar a área foliar de cana-de-açúcar. Revista da STAB 17, 32-34.

ISAAA. 2017. Brazil approves GM sugarcane for commercial use. . Crop Biotech Updates. www.isaaa.org

James C. 2013. ISAAA Brief 46-2013: Executive Summary. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2013. www.isaaa.org

James C. 2016. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief No. 49. ISAAA: Ithaca (NY). www.isaaa.org

Khan IA, Raza G, Ismail M, Raza S, Seema N, Yasmine S. 2015. Assessment of contender sugarcane clones for morphological traits and biotic tolerance under agro-climatic conditions of tando jam. Pakistan Journal of Botany 47, 43-48.

Leidi EO, Barragán V, Rubio L, ElHamdaoui A, Ruiz MT, Cubero B, Fernández JA, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, Quintero FJ. 2010. The AtNHX1 exchanger mediates potassium compartmentation in vacuoles of transgenic tomato. The Plant Journal 61, 495-506.

Marwat KB, Hashim S, Ali H. 2010. Weed management: a case study from north-west Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42, 341-353.

Mitchell H. 2011. Regulation of genetically modified (GM) Sugar cane in Australia. Proc Aust Soc SugarcaneTechnol 33, 1-8.

Office of the Gene Technology Regulator – Australia (OGTR). 2014. Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plan for Commercial Release of Cotton Genetically Modified for Insect Resistance and Herbicide Tolerance (Bollgard®III and Bollgard®III x Roundup Ready Flex®).

Office of the gene technology regulator (OGTR). 2004. Field Trials to Evaluate Genetically Modified Sugarcane Lines Expressing Sucrose Isomerase. The University of Queensland. Application for licence for dealings involving an intentional release into the environment, DIR 051/2004.

Olivares-Villegas J, Berding N, Morgan T, Bennett G. 2010. A Research Framework for Informing the Regulated Deployment of Genetically Modified Sugarcane: Identifying Potential Risks from Sexual Reproduction of Sugarcane in Commercial Fields. ISSCT XXVII Conference Veracruz, Mexico. in press.

Orroño DI, Vesprini F. 2018. Directives and requirements for genetically modified (GM) crop regulation in Argentina. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 18, 301-308.

Pierre J, Rae A, Bonnett G. 2014. Abiotic limits for germination of sugarcane seed in relation to environmental spread. Tropical plant biology 7, 100-110.

Pierre JS, Perroux J, Whan A, Rae AL, Bonnett GD. 2015. Poor fertility, short longevity, and low abundance in the soil seed bank limit volunteer sugarcane from seed. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 3, 83.

Raybould A. 2010. The bucket and the searchlight: formulating and testing risk hypotheses about the weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic crops. Environmental Biosafety Research 9, 123-133.

Raybould A, Quemada H, Romeis J. 2014. Introduction to ISBGMO12: biosafety research past, present and future. Transgenic Research 23, 911-914.

Raza G, Ali K, Ashraf MY, Mansoor S, Javid M, Asad S. 2016. Overexpression of an H+-PPase gene from Arabidopsis in sugarcane improvesdrought tolerance, plant growth, and photosynthetic responses. Turkish Journal of Biology 40, 109-119.

Sarafian V, Kim Y, Poole RJ, Rea PA. 1992. Molecular cloning and sequence of cDNA encoding the pyrophosphate-energized vacuolar membrane proton pump of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 89, 1775-1779.

USDA. 2014. Weed Risk Assessments for Zea mays L. subsp. mays (Poaceae) – Maize and Genetically Engineered HerbicideResistant Maize. United States Department of Agriculture. (Last accessed August 8, 2014.).

Zafar M, Tanveer A, Cheema ZA, Ashraf M. 2010. Weed-crop competition effects on growth and yield of sugarcane planted using two methods. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42, 815-823.

SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT

Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background