Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | February 1, 2016

| Download 2

Resistance to powdery mildew and Cercospora leaf spot of multigerm dihaploid sugar beet lines and its inheritance in their hybrids

Georgi Kikindonov, Tzvetan Kikindonov, Stanimir Enchev

Key Words:

Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.8(2), 19-24, February 2016


IJAAR 2016 [Generate Certificate]


The induced haploidy through in vitro gynogenesis in sugar beet is effective method for the selection of valuable gene recombinations determining the expression of efficient traits of that crop. Ten years test results for the resistance to powdery mildew and Cercospora leaf spot of stabilized multigerm dihaploid sugar beet lines and their hybrid combinations are being reported. The performance of the tested material proves, that the multigerm dihaploid pollinators are differentiated recombinant lines with favorable combinations of genetic material, including genes responsible for the high resistance to the agents of powdery mildew and Cercospora leaf spot fungal diseases. The higher resistance of the dihaploid multigerm pollinators dominates in their diploid hybrid combinations. The heritage factors for higher resistance to both diseases of the maternal component dominate in the tested triploid hybrids. There are good prospects of using these pollinators in the hybrid breeding schemes.


Copyright © 2016
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Resistance to powdery mildew and Cercospora leaf spot of multigerm dihaploid sugar beet lines and its inheritance in their hybrids

Antonov I, Zakhariev A. 1994. State and problems of sugar beet breeding in Bulgaria. Plant Science 31(3-4), 97-101.

Francis S. 2002. Sugar beet powdery mildew (Erysiphe betae). Plant Molecular Pathology 3 (3), 119-124.

Genchev G, Marinova G, Yovcheva V, Ognyanova A. 1975. Biometrical methods in plant growing, genetics and breeding. Zemizdat, Sofia 321-333.

Keane S. 1991. Foliar diseases of sugar beet. Biatas 45(4), 8-9.

Krexner R. 1983. Rezistenzprufung gegen Blattkrankheiten der Rube. Pflanzenarzt 36 (1), 4-7.

Lidanski Т. 1988. Statistical Methods in Biology and Agriculture. Zemizdat, Sofia 150-157.

Nakov B, Karov S, Popov A, Neshev G. 1994. Plant Pathology. Academica Press, Plovdiv 71.

Ruppel EG. 1995. Cercospora leaf spot. In: Whitney ED, Duffus JE Eds. Compendium of Beet Diseases and Insects, American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN 8-15.

Slavova Y. 1993. Effective method for sugar beet haploids obtained from unpollinated ovules. Journal of Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment 7 (2), 34-35.

Smith GA, Campbell LG. 1996. Association between resistance to cercospora and yield in commercial sugar beet varieties. Plant Breeding 115, 28-32.

Smith GA, Gaskill JO. 1970. Inheritance of resistance to Cercospora leaf spot in sugarbeet. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 16, 172-180.

Varbanov V. 1977. Short term prognosis and signalization of the cercosporose in sugar beet. Plant Protection 6, 27-31.

Varbanov V. 1978. Morphology of the powdery mildew in sugar beet. Plant Science 15 (3), 156-163.

Zakhariev A, Kikindonov G. 1997. Possibilities of haploidy application in sugar beet breeding. Plant Science 34 (7-8), 28-30.


Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background