Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | August 1, 2019

| Download 2

Response of rice cultivars and insecticides against Rice stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulus) in Pakistan (Swat)

Anwar Hussain, Afzaal Muhammad, Umer Hayat, Bashir Ahmad, Murtaza Ali, Kholod Khalid Mohammed Boathor, Saif Ullah

Key Words:

J. Bio. Env. Sci.15(2), 88-94, August 2019


JBES 2019 [Generate Certificate]


Rice is amongst the most vital food crops that provide an essential food for approximately half of the world’s population. Rice crops are disposed to both biotic and abiotic stresses. Biotic stresses contain insect pests, fungus and herbicide toxicity. This study was conducted at Agricultural Research Institute (North) Mingora Swat, Khyber Pakhtun Khwa (Pakistan) in 2014 to determine the toxicity of Karate (Lambda Cyhlothrin 2.5g/l), Lorsban (Chlorpyrifos 500g/l), Talstar (Bifentnthrin 100g/l), Lannate (Methomyl 225g/l). Curacron (Profenofos 500g/l) were applied to rice varieties (Oryza sativa), Basmati-385, JP-5, Fakhr-e-Malakand, Swat-1 and Dilrosh against rice stem borer, (Scirpophaga incertulas) and their effect on yield per hectare. In this study, the most resistant rice cultivar and effective insecticide against rice stem borer were investigated. Talstar Super resulted in to highest ranked in their efficacy against rice stem borer; as (3.7%) dead hearts while (7.5%) white hearts was recorded, which is significantly (P < 0.05) lower than control. Talstar with (52.71%) infestation was the most effective insecticide against rice stem borer followed by karate with (44.04%), Lorsbon (42.24%) and Lannate (41.70%). The lowest biological efficacy was recorded for Curacon (10.17%) significantly lower (P < 0.05) than the other tested varieties. The result also displayed the resistance of Swat-1, Basmiti-385 and Dilrosh to rice stem borer. This study made clear the Basmati-385 was the most susceptible variety against rice stem borer with lowest yield, JP-5 with (1688.3kg/ha) ranked first.


Copyright © 2019
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Response of rice cultivars and insecticides against Rice stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulus) in Pakistan (Swat)

Ahmad N, Khan M, TofiquE M. 2011. Insect pests management of BT cotton through the manipulation of different eco-friendly techniques. Nucleus (Islamabad) 48, 249-254.

Bashir K, Husnain T, Fatima T, Latif Z, Mehdi SA, Riazuddin S. 2004. Field evaluation and risk assessment of transgenic indica basmati rice. Molecular Breeding 13, 301-312.

Bux M, Khan M, Ahmad N, Tofique M, Ismail M. 2013. Field comparison of different rice (Oryza sativa L) genotypes for their resistance against rice stem borers (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera). Pak. J. Agri 29, 137-145.

Inayatullah C, Rehman A, Ashraf M. 1986. Management of insect pests of paddy in Pakistan. Progressive Farming (Pakistan) 6, 54-62.

Iram S, Ahmad I, Ashraf M. 2003. A study on fungi and soil born diseases associated with rice-wheat cropping system of Punjab province of Pakistan. Pak J. Biol. Sci 6, 1-6.

Jahn GC, Almazan LP, Pacia JB. 2005. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the intrinsic rate of increase of Hysteroneura setariae (Thomas) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environmental Entomology 34, 938-943.

Jahn GC, Litsinger JA, Chen Y, Barrion AT. 2006. 15 Integrated Pest Management of Rice: Ecological Concepts.

Jiang Y, Duan H, LI J, Yuan L, Wang Z, Gong C, Pei Q. 2005. Current situation and control countermeasures of eventful rice diseases and pests in Shanghai suburbs. Shanghai Nongye Xuebao 21, 78-81.

Khan L, Khaliq A. 1989. Field evaluation of some granular insecticides for the control of rice stem borers [Scirpophaga incertulas, S. innotata, Chilo polychrysa and Sesamia inferens]. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research (Pakistan).

Khan RA, Khan JA, Jamil F, Hamed M. 2005. Resistance of different basmati rice varieties to stem borers under different control tactics of IPM and evaluation of yield. Pakistan Journal of Botany 37, 319.