Responses of morphological characteristic and grain yield of maize cultivars to water stress at reproductive stage

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2013
Views (606)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Responses of morphological characteristic and grain yield of maize cultivars to water stress at reproductive stage

Hossien Khoshvaghti, Mohammad Eskandari-Kordlar, Ramin Lotfi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 3(5), 20-24, May 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

In order to evaluate some morphological and grain yield of maize cultivars (S704, BC678 and H500) under water stress at grain filling stage (no stress and stress), a factorial experiment (using RCB design) with three replicates was conducted in 2012 at Research Farm of Faculty of Agriculture, Payame Noor (PNU) university, East Azerbaijan, Iran. Results indicated plant height, cob leaf area, tassel weight and thereby grain yield per ha were decreased under water limitation at grain filling stage. As water stress occurred in reproductive stage leaf number per plant, stem diameter and cob diameter were not significant. As, stem diameter during water stress was not declined, this indicates that remobilization of assimilate was not occurred in this condition. S704 was superior cultivar in plant height, stem diameter, cob leaf area, tassel weight and consequence grain yield. No significant interaction between irrigation and cultivar indicated that S704 was superior cultivar in both well and limit water conditions. It is, therefore, essential to provide sufficient water during grain filling stage in order to prevent yield loss in maize cultivars.

Alizadeh A. 2010. Relationship between water, soil and plant. Publication by Emam Reza University. 615.P.

Blum A. 2005. Mitigation of drought stress by crop management. http://www.plantstress.com/articles/droughtm7drought_m.htm.

Brouwer et Heibloem. 1986. Irrigation water management: irrigation water needs. Training manual nº3, FAO, Rome.

Chung SY, Vercellotti JR, Sanders TH. 1997. Increase of glycolytic enzymes in peanuts during peanut maturation and curing: evidence of anaerobic metabolism. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45, 4516–4521.

Doorenbos J, Kassam AH. 1979. Yield responds to water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper n. 33. FAO, Rome, Italy. 193, p.

Fatih MK, Ustun S, Yasemin K, Talip T. 2008. Determination water-yield relationship, water use efficiency, crop and pan coefficients for silage maize in a semiarid region. Irrigation science 12, 14-21.

Istanbulluoglu A, Kocaman I, Konukcu F. 2002. Water use production relationship of maize under Tekirdage conditions in Turkey. Pakistan journal of Biological Science 5, 287-291.

Janamatti VS, Sashidhar VR, Prasad IG, Sastry KSK. 1986. Effect of cycles of moisture stress on flowering pattern, flower production, gynophore length and their relationship to pod yield in bunch types of groundnut. Narendra Deva Journal of Agricultural Research 1, 136–142.

Martin D, Brocklin J, Van Wilmes G. 1989. Operating rules for deficit irrigation management. American Journal of Society of Agriculture 22, 1207-1215

Meisner CA, Karnok KJ. 1992. Peanut root response to drought stress. Agronomy Journal 84, 159-165.

Narandra K, Tyagi-Dinesh K, Sharma-Surendra K, Luthra K. 2002. Determination of evapotranspiration for maize and berseem clover. Irrigation Science 21, 173-181.

Plaut Z, Butow BJ, Blumenthal CS, Wrigley CW. 2004. Transport of dry matter in to developing wheat kernels. Field Crops Research 86, 185-198.

Rashid A, Saleem Q, Nazir A, Kazem HS. 2003. Yield potential and stability of nine wheat varieties under water stress conditions. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 5, 7-9.

Reddy TY, Reddy VR, Anbumozhi V. 2003. Physiological responses of groundnut to drought stress and its amelioration: a critical review. Plant growth regulation 41, 75-88.

Related Articles

Prevalence of Anaplasma marginale and Ehrlichia ruminantium in wild grasscutter’ specific ticks in southern Côte d’Ivoire

Zahouli Faustin Zouh Bi, Alassane Toure, Yatanan Casimir Ble, Yahaya Karamoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 21-27, October 2025.

Impact of social media campaigns on farmers awareness of environmental conservation practices

Preeti Raina, Rahul Kumar Darji, Rahul Mittal, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 1-8, October 2025.

Phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activity of ethanolic leaves extract of Psidium guajava

G. Saranya, K. Durgadevi, V. Ramamurthy, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 57-63, September 2025.

Physicochemical and phytochemical analysis of Glycyrrhiza glabra root extract

J. Ramalakshmi, P. Vinodhiniand, V. Ramamurthy, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 50-56, September 2025.

The effects of climate change on built structures in Benin-city, Edo state, Nigeria

A. E. Ilenre, Y. H. Tashok, E. N. Uhumuavbi, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 39-49, September 2025.

A review of the ecological impacts of water pollution on lakes: From diatom assemblages to migratory bird population declines

Arunpandiyan Murugesan, Roshy Ann Mathews, S. Rajakumar, Prashanthi Devi Marimuthu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 23-38, September 2025.

Agroforestry in woody-encroached Sub-Saharan savannas: Transforming ecological challenges into sustainable opportunities

Yao Anicet Gervais Kouamé, Pabo Quévin Oula, Kouamé Fulgence Koffi, Ollo Sib, Adama Bakayoko, Karidia Traoré, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 10-22, September 2025.