Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Responses of morphological characteristic and grain yield of maize cultivars to water stress at reproductive stage

Research Paper | May 1, 2013

| Download 8

Hossien Khoshvaghti, Mohammad Eskandari-Kordlar, Ramin Lotfi

Key Words:

J. Bio. Env. Sci.3( 5), 20-24, May 2013


JBES 2013 [Generate Certificate]


In order to evaluate some morphological and grain yield of maize cultivars (S704, BC678 and H500) under water stress at grain filling stage (no stress and stress), a factorial experiment (using RCB design) with three replicates was conducted in 2012 at Research Farm of Faculty of Agriculture, Payame Noor (PNU) university, East Azerbaijan, Iran. Results indicated plant height, cob leaf area, tassel weight and thereby grain yield per ha were decreased under water limitation at grain filling stage. As water stress occurred in reproductive stage leaf number per plant, stem diameter and cob diameter were not significant. As, stem diameter during water stress was not declined, this indicates that remobilization of assimilate was not occurred in this condition. S704 was superior cultivar in plant height, stem diameter, cob leaf area, tassel weight and consequence grain yield. No significant interaction between irrigation and cultivar indicated that S704 was superior cultivar in both well and limit water conditions. It is, therefore, essential to provide sufficient water during grain filling stage in order to prevent yield loss in maize cultivars.


Copyright © 2013
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Responses of morphological characteristic and grain yield of maize cultivars to water stress at reproductive stage

Alizadeh A. 2010. Relationship between water, soil and plant. Publication by Emam Reza University. 615.P.

Blum A. 2005. Mitigation of drought stress by crop management. http://www.plantstress.com/articles/droughtm7drought_m.htm.

Brouwer et Heibloem. 1986. Irrigation water management: irrigation water needs. Training manual nº3, FAO, Rome.

Chung SY, Vercellotti JR, Sanders TH. 1997. Increase of glycolytic enzymes in peanuts during peanut maturation and curing: evidence of anaerobic metabolism. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45, 4516–4521.

Doorenbos J, Kassam AH. 1979. Yield responds to water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper n. 33. FAO, Rome, Italy. 193, p.

Fatih MK, Ustun S, Yasemin K, Talip T. 2008. Determination water-yield relationship, water use efficiency, crop and pan coefficients for silage maize in a semiarid region. Irrigation science 12, 14-21.

Istanbulluoglu A, Kocaman I, Konukcu F. 2002. Water use production relationship of maize under Tekirdage conditions in Turkey. Pakistan journal of Biological Science 5, 287-291.

Janamatti VS, Sashidhar VR, Prasad IG, Sastry KSK. 1986. Effect of cycles of moisture stress on flowering pattern, flower production, gynophore length and their relationship to pod yield in bunch types of groundnut. Narendra Deva Journal of Agricultural Research 1, 136–142.

Martin D, Brocklin J, Van Wilmes G. 1989. Operating rules for deficit irrigation management. American Journal of Society of Agriculture 22, 1207-1215

Meisner CA, Karnok KJ. 1992. Peanut root response to drought stress. Agronomy Journal 84, 159-165.

Narandra K, Tyagi-Dinesh K, Sharma-Surendra K, Luthra K. 2002. Determination of evapotranspiration for maize and berseem clover. Irrigation Science 21, 173-181.

Plaut Z, Butow BJ, Blumenthal CS, Wrigley CW. 2004. Transport of dry matter in to developing wheat kernels. Field Crops Research 86, 185-198.

Rashid A, Saleem Q, Nazir A, Kazem HS. 2003. Yield potential and stability of nine wheat varieties under water stress conditions. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 5, 7-9.

Reddy TY, Reddy VR, Anbumozhi V. 2003. Physiological responses of groundnut to drought stress and its amelioration: a critical review. Plant growth regulation 41, 75-88.