Risk assessment of arsenic in groundwater of Jacobabad City

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2020
Views (858)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Risk assessment of arsenic in groundwater of Jacobabad City

Amjad Hussain Soomro, Mushtaque Ali Jakhrani, Shahid Ali Jakhrani, Farkhanda Zaman Dayo, Hafeezullah Mazari, Safeullah Bullo, Sanaullah Ansari, Ashfaque Ahmed Jkhrani, Amjad Ali Maitlo
Int. J. Biosci. 16(1), 394-400, January 2020.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2020; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Water is vital constituent for survival of existence on earth, which contains minerals, essential for humans as well as for earth and aquatic life. Water is being polluted due to industrialization, with varying polluting agents, arsenic (As) contamination is one of them. A comprehensive study was carried out for the determination of Arsenic in groundwater of Jacobabad city using microwave-assisted digestion followed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) coupled with mercury Hydride generation system (MHS-15). For that purpose, a total of 98 ground water samples were collected from 07 union councils (UCs) of the Jacobabad city on global position (GPS) method. Results revealed that maximum concentration of As was found (22.0)μg/L in UC-6, (15)μg/L in UC-1 and in UC-3, (13)μg/L in UC-4 and in UC-7, while (12)μg/L in UC-5 and in UC-2 respectively. The minimum and maximum mean concentration of Arsenic was found (3.4)μg/L and(14.6)μg/L, respectively. Out of 98 ground water samples of Jacobabad city, 16 samples were found above the permissible limits of WHO (~16.3% of total samples). Hence, water can be used for drinking purpose with carefulness.

Acharyya SK. 1999. Arsenic poisoning in the Ganges delta. Nature 401, pg, 545-545.

Ahsan T, Zehra K, Munshi. 2009. Chronic Arsenic poisoning. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 59, 105-107.

Carbonell AA, Signes Pastor AJ. 2009. Presence of arsenic in Barrachina, agricultural products from arsenic-endemic areas and strategies to reduce arsenic intake in rural villages. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 53(5), 531-541.

Chakraborti D, Chowdhury PA, Mondal. 2009. Arsenic Burden from Cooked Rice in the Populations of Arsenic Affected and Non affected Areas and Kolkata City in West-Bengal, India. Environmental Science & Technology 43(9), 3349-3355.

Hughes MF. 2002. Arsenic toxicity and potential mechanisms of action. Toxicology Letters 133, 1-16.

Kitchin KT. 2001. Recent advances in arsenic carcinogenesis: modes of action, animal model systems, and methylated arsenic metabolites. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 172, 249-261.

National Drinking Water Quality Standards. 2010. Ministry of Environment. Government of Pakistan.

Nickson R. 1998. Arsenic poisoning of Bangladesh groundwater’. Nature 395, 338-338.

Otles S, Cagindi O. 2010. Health importance of arsenic in drinking water and food. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 32, 1573-2983.

Polya DA, Mondal D. 2008. Rice is a major exposure route for arsenic in Chakdaha block, Nadia district, West Bengal India: A probabilistic risk assessment. Applied Geochemistry 23(11), 2987- 2998.

Rahman A. 1996. Groundwater as source of contamination for water supply in rapidly growing megacities of Asia, Case of Karachi, Pakitstan. Water Science and Technology 34(7-8), 285-292.

Roychowdhury T, Tokunaga H, Ando M. 2003. Survey of arsenic and other heavy metals in food composites and drinking water and estimation of dietary intake by the villagers from an arsenic affected area of West Bengal, India. Sci. Total Environ 308(1-3), 15-35.

Shrestha RR, Shrestha MP, Upadhyay NP, Pradhan R. 2003. Groundwater arsenic contamination, its health impact and mitigation program in Nepal. Journal of Environmental Science and Health 38(1), 185-200.

Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG. 2002. A review of the source, behavior and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Applied Geochemistry 17, 517-568.

Smith AH, Ercumen A, Yuan Y, Steinmaus CM. 2009. Increased lung cancer risks are similar whether arsenic is ingested or inhaled. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 19(4), 343-348.

Related Articles

Optimizing soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) performance through rhizobial inoculation and planting density in Kétou, Benin

Mahougnon Charlotte Carmelle Zoundji*, Ibouraïman Balogoun, Pascal Gbenou, Tobi Moriaque Akplo, Carlosse Djeho, Félix Kouélo Alladassi, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 99-107, June 2026.

Genetic admixture and the philosophy of diplomacy in central Asia: Evidence from intercultural dialogue, governance and genomic data

Shafee Ur Rehman, Waqar Ahmed Khan, Iqra Jamil, Muhammad Abdullah, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 89-98, June 2026.

Synthesizing and integrating environmental awareness and bio-intensive gardening under the Gulayan sa Paaralan (SIBUG) extension project

Violeta F. Collado*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, Marilyn D. Respicio, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 82-88, June 2026.

Diversity of insects related to maize (Zea mays) production in Ferkéssédougou region, Côte d’Ivoire

Fondio Drissa, Dao Hassane, Soro Lacina*, Sib Ollo, Kouadio Roger Hosphade Kouassi, Soro Senan, Yeboue N’guessan Lucie, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 75-81, June 2026.

Diuretic activity assessment of an aqueous extract of Zanthoxylum gilletii (Rutaceae) stem bark in rats

Akoua Jeanne Kanga*, Essoi Kouametchi Hermann, Françoise Assamala Fossou, Kacou Jules Marius Djetouan, Kouao Augustin Amonkan, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 68-74, June 2026.

Phytochemical investigation and in vitro evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Aglaonema hookerianum stems

K. M. Monirul Islam, Simin Shabnam Lopa, Joya Rani, Md. Aslam Sheikh, Md. Golam Sadik*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 60-67, June 2026.

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.