Role of maize residues in transmission of maize chlorotic mottle virus and effect on yield
Paper Details
Role of maize residues in transmission of maize chlorotic mottle virus and effect on yield
Abstract
Maize chlorotic mottle virus (MCMV) is the only established member of the genus Machlomovirus and it is imperative in the development of maize lethal necrosis (MLN) disease. Infection of maize plants with MCMV can cause loss of 10 to 59% in grain yield, while up to 100% in co-infection with cereal infecting potyviruses. The study was carried out to determine the role of MLN disease infected maize residues in transmission of MCMV in the soil and effect on yield. Sowing of commercial hybrid varieties, H614 and WE1101 was done at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 days after incorporation of MLN infected maize residues in the soil. Data collected consisted of virus titre, number of plants with disease symptoms and severity score, plant height and grain yield. Area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) was calculated using the MLN severity data. The highest MCMV titre of 0.2 was detected in H614 sown in freshly incorporated MLN infected residues. Highest disease incidence at 31.9 and 100% was noted in the field and screen house respectively. Maximum disease severity at 21.3 was record in H614 plant sown immediately after incorporating the residues. The highest reduction in plant height at and grain yield at 3.6% and 44.8% respectively was attained in plants established in media incorporated with freshly MLN infected residues. The study confirmed that MCMV was transmitted through MLN infected maize residues in the soil with notable reduction in grain yield. Farmers should be encouraged to practice proper disposal of MLN diseased infected materials practice crop rotation with noncereal crops
Adams IP, Miano DW, Kinyua ZM, Kimani E, Phiri, N, Reeder R, Harju V, Glover R, Hany U, Souza-Richards R, Nath PD, Nixon T, Fox A, Barnes, A, Smith J, Skelton A, Thwaites R, Mumford R, Boonham N. 2012. Use of next-generation sequencing for the identification and characterization of Maize chlorotic mottle virus and Sugarcane mosaic virus causing maize lethal necrosis in Kenya. Plant Pathology 62, 741-749. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j/1365-3059.2012.02690.x
Allen WR. 1981. Dissemination of Tobacco mosaic virus from soil to plant leaves under glasshouse conditions. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 3, 163-168. DOI: 10.1080/07060668109501937
Ammara U, Al-Sadi AM, Al-Shihiand A, Amin I. 2017. Real-time qPCR assay for the TYLCV titer in relation to symptoms-based disease severity scales. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 19, 145-151. DOI: 10.17957/IJAB/15.025
Andika IB, Kondo H, Sun L. 2016. Interplays between soil-borne plant viruses and RNA silencing-mediated antiviral defense in roots. Frontier Microbiology 7, 1458. 1. Published online 2016 Sep 15. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01458
Asare-Bediako E, Vera EA, Aaron A. 2018. Phenotypic and serological evaluation of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) genotypes for resistance to viral infection under field conditions. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 10, 169-177.
Bockelman DL, Claflin LE, Uyemoto JK. 1982. Host range and seed transmission studies of Maize chlorotic mottle virus in grasses and corn. Plant Disease 66, 216-218.
Berazneva J, 2013. Economic value of crop residues in African smallholder agriculture. Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association’s 2013 AAEA and CAES Joint Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, August 4-6.
Cabanas S, Atnable S, Higash CHV, Bressan A. 2013. Dissecting the mode of Maize chlorotic mottle virus transmission (Tombusviridae: Machlomovirus) by Frankliniella williamsi (Thysinoptera:Thripidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 106, 16- 24.
Castillo J, Hebert TT. 1974. A new disease of maize in Peru. Fitopatologia 9, 79-84.
Insert “Deng TC. Chou C-M, Chen C-T, Tsai C-H, Lin, F-C. 2014. First report of Maize chlorotic mottle virus on sweet corn in Taiwan. Plant Disease, 98:1,748.1- 1, 748.1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-14-0568-PDN
Clark MF, Adams AN. 1977. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology 34, 475-483. Doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-34-3-475.
Fillhart RC, Bachand GD, Castello JD. 1998. Detection of infectious Tobamoviruses in forest soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64, 1430-1435.
Goldberg KB, Brakke MK. 1987. Concentration of Maize chlorotic mottle virus increased in mixed infections with Maize dwarf mosaic virus, strain-B. Phytopathology 77, 162-167.
Gowda M, Das B, Makumbi D, Babu R, Semagn K, Mahuki G, Olsen M, Bright J, Beyene Y. Prasanna B. 2015. Genome-wide association and genomic prediction of resistance to maize lethal necrosis disease in tropical maize germplasm. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128, 1957-1968. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-015-2559-0
Hilker FM, Allen LJS, Bokil VA, Briggs CJ, Feng Z, Garrett KA, Gross LJ, Hamelin FM, Jeger MJ, Manore CA, Power AG, Baugh MG, Rua MA, Cunniffe NK. 2017. Modeling virus co-infection to inform management of maize lethal necrosis in Kenya. Phytopathology 107, 1095-1108. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHTO-03-17-0080-FI
Hiruki C, Teakle DS. 1987. Soil-borne viruses of plants. in: Harris K.F. (eds) Current topics in vector research. Current Topics in Vector Research vol 3. Pgs 177-215. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0000761.pub3
Hull R. 1990. Mechanical inoculation of plants. Current Protocols in Microbiology 13, 16B.6.1-16B.6.4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471729259. mc16b06s13
Jensen SG, Wysong S, Ball EM, Higley PM. 1991. Seed transmission of Maize chlorotic mottle virus. Plant disease 75, 497-498. DOI: 10.1094/PD-75-0497.
Jensen SG. 1985. Laboratory transmission of Maize chlorotic mottle virus by three species of corn developed at South Dakota State. Plant Disease 69, 864-868.
Jiang XQ, Meinke LJ, Wright RJ, Wilkinson DR, Campell JE. 1992. Maize chlorotic mottle virus in Hawaiian-grown maize: vector relations, host range and associated viruses. Crop Protection 11, 248-254. DOI: 10.1016/0261-2194(92)90045-7
Jones MW, Pennings BW, Jamann TM, Glaubitz JC, Romay C, Buckler ES, Redinbaugh MG. 2018. Diverse chromosomal locations of quantitative trait loci for tolerance to Maize chlorotic mottle virus in five maize populations. Phytopathology 106, 748-756.
Katan J. 2017. Diseases caused by soil borne pathogens. Biology, management and challenge. Journal of Plant Pathology 99, 305-315. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4454/jpp.v99i2.3862
Koh SH, Li H, Sivasithamparam K, Admiraal R, Jones MGK, Wylie, SJ. 2017. Low root‐to‐root transmission of a Tobamovirus, Yellow tailflower mild mottle virus, and resilience of its virions. Plant Pathology 67, 651-659.
Mahuku G, Lockhart BE, Wanjala B, Jones MW, Kimunye JN, Stewart LR, Cassone BJ, Sevgan S, Nyasani O, Kusia E, Kumar PL, Niblett CL, Kiggundu A, Asea G, Pappu HR, Wangai A, Prasanna BM, Redinbaugh MG. 2015. Maize lethal necrosis (MLN), an emerging threat to maize based food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. Phytopathology 105, 956-965.
Mekureyaw MF. 2017. Maize lethal necrosis disease: an emerging problem of maize production in Eastern Africa. Journal of Plant Physiology and Plant Pathology 5, 4. DOI: 10.4172/2329-955X.1000170
Montenegro MT, Castilio LJ. 1996. .Survival of Maize chlorotic mottle virus in crop residues and seed. Fitopatologia 31, 107-113.
Mwathi JW, Nigam D, Maina S, Stomeo F, Wangai A, Njuguna JN, Holton TA, Wanjala BW, Wamalwa M, Tanui L, Djikeng A. Garcia-Ruiz H. 2018. Metagenomic analysis of viruses associated with maize lethal necrosis in Kenya. Virology Journal 15, 90. https://doi.org/10.1186.
Niblett CL, Claflin, LE. 1978. Corn lethal necrosis a new virus disease of corn in Kansas. Plant Disease Reporter 62, 15-19.
Nyakundi RK. 2017. Reaction of different maize genotypes to infection by maize lethal necrosis disease transmission of viruses causing the disease from soil and plant debris. MSC thesis. University of Nairobi, Kenya. 60- 90
Ranum P, Pena-Rosas JP, Garcia-Casal MN. 2014. Global production, utilization and consumption. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1312, 105-112. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12396.
Roberts AG. 2014. Plant Viruses: Soil‐borne. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0000761.pub3
Simko I, Piepho HP. 2012. The area under the disease progress stairs: Calculation, advantage and application. Analytical and Theoretical Plant Pathology 102, 381-389.
Uyemoto JK, Bockelman DL, Claflin LE. 1980. Severe outbreak of corn lethal necrosis disease in Kansas. Plant Diseases 64, 99-100.
Uyemoto JK. 1983. Biology and control of Maize mottle chlorotic virus. Plant disease 67, 7-10.
Veena DR, Priy, HR, Khatib, RM, Joythi, D. 2014. Soilborne diseases in crop plants and their management. Journal of Agriculture and Allied Sciences 3, 12-18.
Viswanathan R, Balamuralikrishnan M. 2005. Impact of mosaic infection on growth and yield of sugarcane. Sugar Tech 7, 61-65.
Wang Q, Zhang C, Wang C, Qian Y, Li Z, Hong J, Zhou X. 2017. Further characterization of Maize chlorotic mottle virus and is synergistic interaction with Sugarcane mosaic virus in maize. Science Report, 739960.
Wangai AW, Redinbaugh MG, Kinyua ZM, Miano DW, Lely PK, Kasina M, Mahuku D, Sheets K, Jeffers D. 2012. First report of Maize chlorotic mottle virus and maize lethal necrosis in Kenya. Plant Disease 96, 1582.
Yang L, Wang XY, Han L, Spiertz H, Liao SH, Wei MG, Xie GH. 2015. A qualitative assessment of crop residue feedstocks for biofuel in North and Northeast China. GCB Bioenergy 7, 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12109
Teresa Nyambura Kinyungu, James Wanjohi Muthomi, Sevgan Subramanian, Douglas Watuku Miano, Florence M’mogi Olubayo, Michael Angwenyi Maobe (2019), Role of maize residues in transmission of maize chlorotic mottle virus and effect on yield; IJB, V14, N4, April, P337-348
https://innspub.net/role-of-maize-residues-in-transmission-of-maize-chlorotic-mottle-virus-and-effect-on-yield/
Copyright © 2019
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0