Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Role of PowerPoint Presentation as Instructional Tool for Enhancing Senior Secondary School Students Performance in Biology

Research Paper | February 1, 2022

| Download 39

Iroriteraye-Adjekpovu Janice Imizuokena

Key Words:

Int. J. Biosci.20( 2), 95-103, February 2022

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/20.2.95-103


IJB 2022 [Generate Certificate]


This study enthralled the role of PowerPoint presentation as an instructional tool for enhancing students’ performance in biology at the secondary level within Ethiope East Local Government Area (EELGA), Delta State. To achieve this, questionnaires on Biology Achievement Test (BAT) were administered to secondary school (SSII) students subjected to the projected presentation via PowerPoint and lecture methods in two (2) secondary schools randomly selected within EELGA of Delta State. The data collected were analyzed using the student t-test and mean score. The result indicated a significant difference (p>0.05) in student performance in biology between students taught using projected presentation via PowerPoint with a mean-score of 59.3 compared to those taught without projected presentation via PowerPoint with a mean score of 57.5. Biology performance among male and female students taught using projected presentation via PowerPoint was significantly (p>0.05) higher compared to their counterparts taught using the lecture method. The study also recorded a significant difference (p>0.05) between the performance of male and female students in biology. The study recommends that teachers should encourage PowerPoint presentations for teaching and also encourage group interactions. Government and ministries should make available resources for schools to enable adequate use of instructional resources.


Copyright © 2022
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Role of PowerPoint Presentation as Instructional Tool for Enhancing Senior Secondary School Students Performance in Biology

Adalikwu SA, Iorkpilgh IT. 2013. The influence of instructional materials on academic performance of senior secondary school students in chemistry in Cross River State. Global Journal of Educational Research 12, 39-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v12i1.6

Ajai JT, Imoko II. 2015. Gender differences in mathematics achievement and retention scores: A case of problem-based learning method. International Journal of Research in Education and Science 1(1), 45- 50.

Allan MJ. 2003. The use and abuse of PowerPoint in teaching and learning in the life sciences: a personal overview., Bioscience Education 2(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.2003.020000.04

Amosun PA. 2011. Performance and attitude of male and female students in physical geography in urban and rural schools of Ogun State, Nigeria. African Journal for the Study of Educational Issues 4(4), 95-198.

Aninweze CA. 2014. Effects of two instructional delivery approaches on senior secondary schools’ students’ achievement and retention in biology. M.Ed Thesis submitted to the Department of Science Education Faculty of Education University of Nigeria, Nsukka, p 143.

Apperson JM, Laws EL, Scepansky JA. 2006. The impact of presentation graphics on students’ experience in the classroom. Computers and Education 47, 116–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.09.003

Asogwa UD, Echemazu R. 2011. Effect of power point presentation on secondary school students’ achievement in Christian religious. International Journal of Educational Research 11(1), 22-30.

Awofala AOA, Nneji LM. 2011. Effect of framing and team assisted individualized instructional strategies on students’ achievement in mathematics. African Journal for the Study of Educational Issues 4(4), 75-89.

Aydogdu C. 2006. The effect of computer-assisted chemical chemistry teaching on student success. Ataturk University Bayburt Faculty of Education Magazine 1(1), 80-90.

Bartscha AR, Cobern KM. 2003. Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers and Education 41(1), 77–86.

Beets SD, Lobingier PG. 2001. Pedagogical techniques: Student performance and preferences. Journal of Education for Business 76, 231–235.

Beniamino C. 2019. Gender norms and social norms: differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science. Sociology of Health and Illness 42(2), 407-422.

Dania PO. 2014. Effect of gender on student’s academic achievement in secondary school social studies. Journal of Education and Practice 5(21), 78-84.

Gambari AI, Yusuf HT, Balogun SA. 2014. Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentation on students’ cognitive achievement in technical drawing. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology 3(4), 1-12.

Gunel M, Hand B, Gunduz S. 2006. Comparing student understanding of quantum physics when embedding multimodal representations into two different writing formats: presentation format versus summary report format. Science Education 90, 1092-1112.

Hasan G, Mustafa K, Mehmet E, Ali A, Sakip K. 2010. The effect of PowerPoint presentations prepared and presented by prospective teachers on biology achievement and attitudes toward biology. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2, 3043–3047.

Lari FA. 2014. The impact of using PowerPoint presentations on students’ learning and motivation in secondary schools. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 98, 1672 – 1677.

Naki E. 2011. The effect of PowerPoint and traditional lectures on students’ achievement in physics. Journal of Turkish Science Education 8(3), 176-189.

Okwara OL, Anyagh PI, Ikyaan GS. 2017. Effect of projected instructional media on senior secondary school student’s achievement in biology. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education 10(2), 137-147.

Olikeze FC. 1999. Effect of computer-assisted instruction on secondary school student’s cognitive achievement and interest in biology. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation. Nsukka: University of Nigeria.

Russell JC, Joel HA. 2006. PowerPoint presentation technology and the dynamics of teaching. Innovations in High Education 31, 147–160.

Savoy A, Proctor RW, Salvendy G. 2009. Information retention from PowerPoint and traditional lectures. Computers and Education 52, 858-867.

Susskind J. 2005. PowerPoint’s power in the classroom: Enhancing students’ self-efficacy and attitudes. Computers and Education 45, 203 – 215.

Szabo A, Hastings N. 2000. Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: Should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers and Education 35, 175–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00030-0