Role of VA Mycorrhiza in the Development of Agroforestry Model and other Floristic Vegetation in the Degraded land

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2015
Views (329) Download (16)

Role of VA Mycorrhiza in the Development of Agroforestry Model and other Floristic Vegetation in the Degraded land

Agarwal Rashmi, Bhavana Dixit
J. Bio. Env. Sci.7( 4), 1-8, October 2015.
Certificate: JBES 2015 [Generate Certificate]


Chhattisgarh region of India has adequate forest area, unfortunately the forests, owing to the adverse biotic factors are by and large under stocked and degraded resulting in the intense demand for food, fuel, fodder and small timber together with increased erosion of environment. To address these problems, a study was carried out to rehabilitate the degraded land through different agro forestry models in Northern Chhattisgarh region. The main agro forestry models developed in different sites were agrisilvicutural system, agrisilvi-pastoral-system, silvi-pastoral system and multistory models with multipurpose tree species. The species under trial were Bamboo sp., Embelica officinalis, Dalbergia sissoo, Gmelina arborea, Pongamia pinnata, Albizia procera, Albizia lebbeck, Terminalia arjuna, Acacia catechu, Acacia nilotica, Azadirachta indica and Leucaena leucocephala, atdifferent degraded sites on farmers land, community land and government land at different spacing with different combinations. Mycorrhiza was used as biofertilizer treatment and control was also maintained for each treatment. The split plot design was selected because the fertility of land varied. Observations regarding height, collar diameter, VAM infection per cent, SVI and survival per cent were recorded. The physiochemical parameters of the soil and growth parameters of the species were recorded periodically and analyzed statistically. Gmelina arborea based agro-forestry model was found better in performance as compared to other developed models.Study reveals that degraded land could be restored and improved through development of appropriate agroforestry models, thus, enhancing the livelihood and environmental security.


Abdul-baki AA, Anderson SD. 1973. Vigour Determination in Soybean by Multiple Criteria. Crop Science 3, 630-633.

Arnold JEM. 1983. Economic Considerations in Agroforestry Projects. Agroforestry Systems 1, 299-311.

Curtis JT, Mc Intosh RP. 1950. The interrelations of certain analytical and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31, 245-271.

Deb Roy R. 1990. Forage and Top Feed Production Potential Under Silvipastoral System. Paper in National Seminar on Forest Productivity. F.R.I., Dehradun.

Dwivedi AP. 199. Agroforestry: Principals and Practices. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. PVT. LTD.New Delhi, 308.

Gerdemann JW, Nicolson TH. 1963. Spores of mycorrhizal Endogone species extracted from soil by wet sieving and decanting. – Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 46, 235-244.

Hoekstra DA. 1985. The Use of Economics in Diagonosis and Design of Agroforestry Systems. ICRAF, Nairobi, Working paper No. 29.

Menge JA, Davis RM, Johnson ELV, Zentmyer GA. 1978. Mycorrhizal Fungi Increase Growth and Reduce Transplant Injury in Avocades. Callf. Agric., 32, 6-7.

Mosse B. 1981. VAM Research for Tropical Agriculture. Ins. Trop.Agri. and Human Resources, University of Hawalli.

Phillips JH, Hayman DS. 1970. Improved Procedures for Clearing Roots and Staining Parasitic and VAM Fungi for Rapid Assessment of Infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 55, 158-161.

Rashmi Agarwal, Ojha BM. 2004. Rehabilitation of Degraded Land by Biotechnological Approach in Chhattisgarh Region- A Step Towards Afforestation of Desert. Journal of Arid land Studies 14S, 73-76.

Rashmi  Agarwal,  Ojha  BM,  Bhavana  Dixit. 2011. Management of Degraded Land Through Gmelina arborea Linn. Based Agroforestry Practices Integrated with Biotechnological Approach 29, 1-2, IJTA, 113-117.

Reena J, Bagyaraj DJ. 1990. Response of Acacia nilotica and Colliandra callothyrus to Different VA Mycorrhizal Fungi. In: Arid Soil Res. Rehat. 4, 261-268.

Rose JP. 1971. Effect of Phosphate Fertilization on Yield on Mycirrhizal and Non Mycorrhizal Soybean. Phytopath, 61, 1400-1403.

Shankarnarayana KA,  Harsh LN,  Katiuu  S. 1987. Agroforestry in the Arid Zones of India. Agroforestry Systems 5, 67-88.

Sharma P, Niranjan R, Banwarilal Rao VA. 1990. Interaction between Rhizobium (Cow pea miscellany) and Mycorrhizal Fungi and their Stimulatory Effect on Acacia nilotica. In. Current Trends in Mycorrhizal Research, (Eds, B.L. Jalali and H. Chand). HAU, Hissar.

Sieverding E, Toro S. 1988. Influence of Soil and Water Regime on VAM. In. Performance of Different VAM Fungal Species with Casava. J. Agro. Crop. Sci. 16, 322-332.

Tarent RF. 1983. N Fixation in North America Forestry, Res. and Application: In Bio N Fixation in Forest Ecosystem Foundation and Application. (Eds, J. C. Gordan and C. T. Whheler), Mortinus N. Nijhott, Dr.,W. Jink, Hauge Netherland, 261-27.

Varma A. 1995. Ecophysiology and application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in arid soils. In: Varma, A. & Hock, B. (Eds) Mycorrhiza- Structure , Function, Molecular Biology and biotechnology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 561-592.

Verma RK, Jamaluddin. 1994. Effect of VAM Fungi on Growth and Survival of Acacia nilotica Seedlings Under Different Moisture Regime. Indian Forester 121(6), 533-539.

Verma RK, Jamaluddin, Gupta BN. 1994. Effect of Inoculation of VAM Fungi and Rhizobium on Growth on Growth and Biomass Production in Acacia nilotica in Nursery. Indian Forester 120(12), 1089-1094.