Screening of several sorghum genotypes on acid soil tolerance

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/11/2014
Views (525)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Screening of several sorghum genotypes on acid soil tolerance

Tri Lestari, Didy Sopandie, Trikoesoemaningtyas, SinthoWahyuning Ardie
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 5(5), 170-176, November 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Genotypes with contrasting tolerance level to acid soil is very important as genetic source in breeding activity. This study was aimed to obtain sorghum genotypes that tolerant and sensitive to acid soil. This study was conducted in Bagoang Village, Jasinga, Bogor District, from March to August 2012. A randomized completely block design was used as experimental design. Seven sorghum genotypes that were used in this study included 4 sorghum lines of [ICRISAT] collection (150-21-A, 5-193-C, 10-90-A, 150-20-A), 1 local sorghum (WHP), and 2 national varieties (Numbu, UPCA). Numbu is a known as an acid soil tolerant variety and was used as positive control. Our results showed that WHP genotype had significantly higher plant height and panicle length, and similar number of leaves, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, and yield that of Numbu. In contrast, 150-20-A genotypes had significantly lower plant height, number of leaves, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, and shorter panicle than that of WHP genotype. It can be concluded that from agronomy caracter of the seven sorghum genotypes used in this study, WHP and Numbu could be classified as acid soil tolerant genotypes while 150-21-A and UPCA genotypes were sensitive to acid soil. Biplot analysis showed genotypes x caracter, shoot fresh weigh caracter and root fresh weight caracter were classified determinant caracter different response to acid soil stress.

Agustina K, Sopandie D, Trikoesoemaningtyas Wirnas D. 2010. Roots physiological response of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench.) to aluminum toxicity and phosphorous deficiencies in rhizotron. J.Agron. Indonesia 38(2), 88-94.

Caniato FF, Guimaraes CT, Schaffert RE, Alves VMC, Kochian LV, Borem A, Klein PE, Magalhaes JV. 2007. Genetic diversity for aluminum tolerance in sorghum. Theoretical and Applied Genetic 114, 863-876.

Dicko MH, Gruppen H, Traore AS, Voragen AGJ, Van Berkel WJH. 2006. Sorghum grain as human food in Africa, relevance of content of starch and amylase activities. African Journal of Biotechnology 5(5), 384-395. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB

Kim HK, Oosterom EV, Dingkuhn M, Luquet D, Hammer G. 2010. Regulation of tillering in sorghum: environmental effects. Annals of Botany 106, 57–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq079

Kim HK, Luquet D, Oosterom EV, Dingkuhn M, Hammer G. 2010. Regulation of tillering in sorghum: genotypic effects. Annals of Botany 106, 69–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq080

Kochian LV, Hoekenga OA. 2004. How do crop plant tolerance acid soils? Mechanism of aluminium tolerance and phosphorus efficiency. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol 55, 459-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141655

Kochian LV, Piñeros MA, Hoekenga OA. 2005. The physiology, genetics and molecular biology of plant aluminum resistance and toxicity. Plant and soil 274, 175-195.

Marschner H. 2012. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 3rd edn. London: Academic Press Harcourt Brace and Company Publishers. 889 p.

Mulyani A, Rachman A, Dariah. 2010. Acid dry land in Indonesia, the potential and availability for agricultural development. (in Indonesia) http://balittanah.litbang.deptan.go.id

Natawijaya A. 2012. Genetic analysis and early generation selection to identifity high yielding segregants in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) PhD thesis, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor.

Sungkono Trikoesoemaningtyas, Wirnas D, Sopandie D, Human S, Yudiarto MA. 2009. Estimation of Genetic Paramaters and Selection of Sorghum Mutant Lines Under Acid Soil Stress Condition. J.Agron. Indonesia 37(3), 220-225

Taiz L, Zeiger E. 2002. Plant Physiology. Third Edition. Sinauer Associates, Publishing Company, Inc. Sunderland, Massachusetts. 690 p.

Wang X, Tang C, Guppy CN, Sale WPG. 2008. Phosphorus acquisition characteristics of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) under P deficient conditions. Plant Soil 312, 117-128. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9589-1

Zheng SJ. 2010. Crop Production on Acidic Soils: Overcoming Alumunium Toxicity and Phosphorus Deficiency. Annals of Botany 106, 183-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq134

Related Articles

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.

Pruning and population density as smart solution to sustainable tomato production

Reychel I. Wamel, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Victoriano V. Casco, Lucila V. Rocha, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 99-112, May 2025.

Enhancing growth and yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) through fertilizer supplementation strategies

Catherine N. Payadon, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 83-98, May 2025.

Propagation techniques and organic fertilizer supplementation on growth and tuber yield of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius)

Frimalyn P. De Vera, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 66-82, May 2025.

Bio-efficacy of different neem formulations against onion armyworm (Spodoptera exigua)

Roan Joy P. Tubera, Artemio A. Martin, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 55-65, May 2025.