Socio-economic component, coastal resource use and perception, and participation of the coastal communities/fishing households in San Jose, Gonzaga, Cagayan

Paper Details

Research Paper 06/12/2022
Views (435) Download (45)

Socio-economic component, coastal resource use and perception, and participation of the coastal communities/fishing households in San Jose, Gonzaga, Cagayan

Gerlie B. Hardy
Int. J. Biosci.21( 6), 267-273, December 2022.
Certificate: IJB 2022 [Generate Certificate]


The study generally identified and analyzed the socio-economic status, coastal resource use, and perception and community participation of coastal communities of the community of San Jose in Gonzaga, Cagayan. The research conducted interviews based on questionnaires and used a descriptive survey as the research design. Thirty-seven respondents were interviewed and most of them are members of San Jose Fisher folk Association. It revealed that most have low levels of education, with fishing as the main source of income for the residents. This dominance of fishing is a major economic factor contributing to the income of the community. The fishing activities are not only limited to marine waters but also to estuary areas where mangroves thrive. Meanwhile, due to climate change and resource-dependent communities, today, benefits derived from coastal environments are limited since there were some changes observed in fishing ground location, the volume of catch, size of fish, coral reef, mangroves, and beaches. Generally, it implies that a full understanding of socio-economic characteristics, coastal resource use, and perception of the coastal community of Barangay San Jose play important roles in the coastal resource restoration and management plans. Also, these help to understand the underlying causes of degradation and interventions needed in the community.


Cinner J. 2000. “Socioeconomic influences on coastal resource use in Mahahual, Mexico (Master’s thesis, University  of Rhode Island).

Eaton E, Burton H, Steer MD, Belle EMS. 2009. “A Socio-economic study of mangrove perceptions and Management in the bay of Antsiranana: Ambalisakely, Abalibabe, Andohazompona, Ampasirikely and Antsisikala,” Frontier Madagascar Environmental Research Report Society for Environmental Exploration, UK.

Haritha M, Nisha KAS, Sekhar PR. 2017. “A study on mangrove ecology and socio-economic status of fishing communities in coringa region of East Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh, India,” International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies, IV 1, pp. 01-04,

Lavieren HV, Spalding M, Alongi D, Kainuma M, Godt MC, Adeel Z. 2012. “Securing the Future of Mangroves, A Policy Brief. United Nations University. Institute for Water, Environmental and Health, Hamilton, Canada pp. 1-53.

Lewis RR. 2009. “Methods and criteria for successful mangrove forest restoration. Coastal Wetlands: An Integrated Ecosystem Approach,” Elsevier pp. 787-800,

Martinuzzi S, Gould WA, Lugo AE, Medina E. 2009. “Conversion and Recovery of Puerto Rican mangroves: years of change,” Forest Ecology and Management, CCLVII(1), pp.75-84,

Pacris FA, Jr Bayani GU, Baloloy MV. 2020. Bio-physical and chemical assessment of Mangrove waters in  Gonzaga, Cagayan, International Journal of Biosciences XVI(6), pp. 241-248.

Pasion EQ, Tumaliuan BT. 2015. “State of the Mangroves in Cagayan,” Mangrove Proceedings pp. 55-58.

Tietze U. 2004. “Technical and socio-economic characteristics of small-scale coastal fishing communities, and opportunities for poverty alleviation and empowerment,” FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1111. Rome, Italy.

Zakaria M., Rajpar M. 2015. “Assessing the fauna diversity of Marudu Bay mangrove forest, Sabah, Malaysia, for future Conservation,” Diversity, VII 2, pp. 137-148,